MuToN Quantifies Binding Affinity Changes upon Protein Mutations by Geometric Deep Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Assessing changes in protein–protein binding affinity due to mutations helps understanding a wide range of crucial biological processes within cells. Despite significant efforts to create accurate computational models, predicting how mutations affect affinity remains challenging due to the complexity of the biological mechanisms involved. In the present work, a geometric deep learning framework called MuToN is introduced for quantifying protein binding affinity change upon residue mutations. The method, designed with geometric attention networks, is mechanism‐aware. It captures changes in the protein binding interfaces of mutated complexes and assesses the allosteric effects of amino acids. Experimental results highlight MuToN's superiority compared to existing methods. Additionally, MuToN's flexibility and effectiveness are illustrated by its precise predictions of binding affinity changes between SARS‐CoV‐2 variants and the ACE2 complex.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Protein Structure and Dynamics · Machine Learning in Bioinformatics · RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering School of Control Science and Engineering Shandong University, Jinan Shandong 250061 China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmeth.302710.1038/nmeth.3027 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41592-018-0138-410.1038/s41592-018-0138-4 ↗
3. 10.1186/s13059-019-1845-610.1186/s13059-019-1845-6 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmeth0410-24810.1038/nmeth0410-248 ↗
5. 10.1186/1471-2164-16-S8-S110.1186/1471-2164-16-S8-S1 ↗
6. 10.1038/ng.381010.1038/ng.3810 ↗
7. 10.1038/ng.289210.1038/ng.2892 ↗
8. 10.1093/nar/gkg50910.1093/nar/gkg509 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41586-021-04043-810.1038/s41586-021-04043-8 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.adg749210.1126/science.adg7492 ↗
11. 10.1038/nbt.376910.1038/nbt.3769 ↗
12. 10.1093/molbev/msy14110.1093/molbev/msy141 ↗
13. 10.1093/bib/bbab55510.1093/bib/bbab555 ↗
14. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100854310.1371/journal.pcbi.1008543 ↗
15. 10.1093/nar/gkz38310.1093/nar/gkz383 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.10093910.1016/j.isci.2020.100939 ↗
17. 10.3390/ijms2107256310.3390/ijms21072563 ↗
18. 10.1038/s42256-020-0149-610.1038/s42256-020-0149-6 ↗
19. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100928410.1371/journal.pcbi.1009284 ↗
20. 10.1109/MSP.2017.269341810.1109/MSP.2017.2693418 ↗
21. 10.1038/s42256-021-00418-810.1038/s42256-021-00418-8 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-210.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41592-022-01490-710.1038/s41592-022-01490-7 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467-023-37701-810.1038/s41467-023-37701-8 ↗
25. 10.1093/nar/gkad28810.1093/nar/gkad288 ↗
26. 10.1038/s42256-023-00715-410.1038/s42256-023-00715-4 ↗
27. F.Sverrisson J.Feydy B. E.Correia M. M.Bronstein inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition IEEE Piscataway NJ2021 pp.15272–15281.
28. O.‐E.Ganea X.Huang C.Bunne Y.Bian R.Barzilay T. S.Jaakkola A.Krause Independent se (3)‐equivariant models for end‐to‐end rigid protein docking[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.07786 2021.
29. H.Stärk O.Ganea L.Pattanaik R.Barzilay T.Jaakkola inProceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning PMLR New York2022 pp.20503–20521.
30. F.Sverrisson J.Feydy J.Southern M. M.Bronstein B. E.Correia inInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) Machine Learning for Drug Discovery 2022.
31. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx35010.1093/bioinformatics/btx350 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41592-019-0666-610.1038/s41592-019-0666-6 ↗
33. 10.1093/nar/28.1.23510.1093/nar/28.1.235 ↗
34. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz43710.1093/bioinformatics/btz437 ↗
35. R.Dassault Systèmes BIOVIA Dassault Systèmes: San Diego2016.
36. 10.1093/nar/gki38710.1093/nar/gki387 ↗
37. 10.1038/nature1300110.1038/nature13001 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.sbi.2020.01.01110.1016/j.sbi.2020.01.011 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.03410.1016/j.cell.2013.03.034 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.02810.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.028 ↗
41. 10.1073/pnas.94.5.165710.1073/pnas.94.5.1657 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41467-021-26401-w10.1038/s41467-021-26401-w ↗
43. 10.1038/s41586-023-06617-010.1038/s41586-023-06617-0 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.01210.1016/j.cell.2020.08.012 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41467-020-18694-010.1038/s41467-020-18694-0 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41586-022-04586-410.1038/s41586-022-04586-4 ↗
47. Notin P. · Proc. Mach. Learn. · 2022 · 162
48. 10.1093/molbev/msz17910.1093/molbev/msz179 ↗
49. Rao R. M. · Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2021 · 139 · 8844
50. Meier J. · Adv. Neural Inf. Proc. Syst. · 2021 · 34
51. 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.11.02210.1016/j.jmb.2016.11.022 ↗
52. 10.7554/eLife.7065810.7554/eLife.70658 ↗
53. 10.1126/science.abo789610.1126/science.abo7896 ↗
54. 10.1093/nar/gkg54310.1093/nar/gkg543 ↗
55. 10.1126/science.ade257410.1126/science.ade2574 ↗
56. Vaswani A. · Adv. neural Inf. Proc. Syst. · 2017 · 30
57. 10.1073/pnas.201623911810.1073/pnas.2016239118 ↗