journal article·2023-09Open access

Structural Basis for the Enzymatic Activity of the HACE1 HECT‐Type E3 Ligase Through N‐Terminal Helix Dimerization

Sunil Singh, Satoru Machida, Nikhil Kumar Tulsian, Yeu Khai Choong, Joel Ng, Srihari Shankar, Yaochen Liu, Krisha Vashdev Chandiramani, Jian Shi, J Sivaraman

Advanced Science· Volume 10· Issue 27

Abstract

Abstract HACE1 is an ankyrin repeat (AKR) containing HECT‐type E3 ubiquitin ligase that interacts with and ubiquitinates multiple substrates. While HACE1 is a well‐known tumor suppressor, its structure and mode of ubiquitination are not understood. The authors present the cryo‐EM structures of human HACE1 along with in vitro functional studies that provide insights into how the enzymatic activity of HACE1 is regulated. HACE1 comprises of an N‐terminal AKR domain, a middle (MID) domain, and a C‐terminal HECT domain. Its unique G‐shaped architecture interacts as a homodimer, with monomers arranged in an antiparallel manner. In this dimeric arrangement, HACE1 ubiquitination activity is hampered, as the N‐terminal helix of one monomer restricts access to the C‐terminal domain of the other. The in vitro ubiquitination assays, hydrogen‐deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX–MS) analysis, mutagenesis, and in silico modeling suggest that the HACE1 MID domain plays a crucial role along with the AKRs in RAC1 substrate recognition.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis · Cancer-related gene regulation · Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biological Sciences National University of Singapore 14 Science Drive 4 Singapore 117558 Singapore

Department of Biochemistry National University of Singapore 28 Medical Drive Singapore 117546 Singapore

Funding

Ministry of Education

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060310-17032810.1146/annurev-biochem-060310-170328 ↗
2. 10.1038/nrm292110.1038/nrm2921 ↗
3. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010605.09350310.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010605.093503 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.10780910.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107809 ↗
5. 10.1038/373081a010.1038/373081a0 ↗
6. 10.1038/nrm269010.1038/nrm2690 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.02.00510.1016/j.molcel.2016.02.005 ↗
8. 10.1515/hsz-2017-018410.1515/hsz-2017-0184 ↗
9. 10.1042/BCJ2020002710.1042/BCJ20200027 ↗
10. 10.1074/jbc.RA119.01032710.1074/jbc.RA119.010327 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.06.03210.1016/j.molcel.2021.06.032 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41589-021-00831-510.1038/s41589-021-00831-5 ↗
13. 10.1002/ctm2.77010.1002/ctm2.770 ↗
14. 10.1242/jcs.13294410.1242/jcs.132944 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.05.01510.1016/j.ccr.2014.05.015 ↗
16. 10.1002/1873-3468.1403110.1002/1873-3468.14031 ↗
17. 10.1038/ncomms150910.1038/ncomms1509 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.01510.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.015 ↗
19. 10.1038/onc.2014.46810.1038/onc.2014.468 ↗
20. 10.1093/hmg/ddh21510.1093/hmg/ddh215 ↗
21. 10.1073/pnas.131442111110.1073/pnas.1314421111 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.07210.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.072 ↗
23. 10.1186/1471-2148-10-5610.1186/1471-2148-10-56 ↗
24. 10.1002/ctm2.92210.1002/ctm2.922 ↗
25. 10.18632/oncoscience.41810.18632/oncoscience.418 ↗
26. 10.3390/ijms2202060910.3390/ijms22020609 ↗
27. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu03110.1093/bioinformatics/btu031 ↗
28. 10.1093/nar/gkq36610.1093/nar/gkq366 ↗
29. 10.1038/nsmb.256610.1038/nsmb.2566 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.01010.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.010 ↗
31. 10.1126/science.286.5443.132110.1126/science.286.5443.1321 ↗
32. 10.1038/srep4477910.1038/srep44779 ↗
33. 10.1093/nar/gky101510.1093/nar/gky1015 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41418-018-0090-y10.1038/s41418-018-0090-y ↗
35. 10.2174/138945012066619022718465410.2174/1389450120666190227184654 ↗
36. 10.1093/nar/gkab42210.1093/nar/gkab422 ↗
37. 10.1038/nprot.2016.16910.1038/nprot.2016.169 ↗
38. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06209.x10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06209.x ↗
39. 10.1093/nar/gkt33210.1093/nar/gkt332 ↗
40. 10.1002/jcc.2029110.1002/jcc.20291 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.00110.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 ↗
42. 10.7554/eLife.2103610.7554/eLife.21036 ↗
43. 10.1021/acschembio.1c0043310.1021/acschembio.1c00433 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41598-018-19471-210.1038/s41598-018-19471-2 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.09.02410.1016/j.molcel.2011.09.024 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.str.2012.07.01410.1016/j.str.2012.07.014 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.05010.1016/j.cell.2007.06.050 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41467-019-11224-710.1038/s41467-019-11224-7 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.03.02010.1016/j.molcel.2017.03.020 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.00610.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006 ↗
51. 10.1038/nmeth.416910.1038/nmeth.4169 ↗
52. D.Asarnow E.Palovcak Y.Cheng asarnow/pyem: UCSF pyem v0.5 (v0.5). Zenodo. 2019 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3576630.
53. 10.1107/S205979831700785910.1107/S2059798317007859 ↗
54. 10.1107/S205979831800731310.1107/S2059798318007313 ↗
55. 10.1002/pro.394310.1002/pro.3943 ↗
56. Adams P. D. · Biol · 2010 · 66 · 213
57. 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-210.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 ↗
58. 10.1126/science.abj875410.1126/science.abj8754 ↗
59. 10.1107/S205979831800242510.1107/S2059798318002425 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.str.2007.11.01610.1016/j.str.2007.11.016 ↗
61. 10.1107/S205979831800655110.1107/S2059798318006551 ↗
62. 10.1002/pro.379010.1002/pro.3790 ↗
63. 10.1021/ac800886210.1021/ac8008862 ↗
64. 10.1002/pro.421010.1002/pro.4210 ↗
65. 10.7554/eLife.6364610.7554/eLife.63646 ↗
66. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa67710.1093/bioinformatics/btaa677 ↗
67. 10.1002/0471140864.ps0713s6010.1002/0471140864.ps0713s60 ↗