journal article·2025-02Open access

Susceptibility of Mitophagy‐Deficient Tumors to Ferroptosis Induction by Relieving the Suppression of Lipid Peroxidation

Shan Liu, Jing‐Hong Chen, Li‐Chao Li, Zhi‐Peng Ye, Jian‐Nan Liu, Yu‐Hong Chen, Bing‐Xin Hu, Jia‐Hong Tang, Gong‐Kan Feng, Zhi‐Ming Li, Chu‐Xia Deng, Rong Deng, Xiao‐Feng Zhu, Hai‐Liang Zhang

Advanced Science· Volume 12· Issue 6

Abstract

Abstract The identification of ferroptosis‐sensitive cancers is critical for the application of ferroptosis‐inducing therapies in cancer therapy. Here, patient‐derived organoid screening models of colorectal cancer are established to identify tumors that are sensitive to ferroptosis‐inducing therapy. This study discovers that patient‐derived tumors characterized by mitophagy deficiency are hypersensitive to ferroptosis‐inducing therapies. Mechanistically, a novel negative feedback regulatory pathway of lipid peroxidation is identified, which is one of the important intrinsic anti‐ferroptosis mechanisms of cancer cells. Lipid peroxidation‐mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress transcriptionally upregulates Parkin to promote mitophagy through ATF4. Mitophagy limits the generation of lipid peroxidation products and subsequently inhibits ferroptosis by inhibiting the accumulation of mitochondrial ROS. Mitophagy‐deficient tumors lack this anti‐ferroptotic mechanism, unleashing the generation of lipid peroxidation and potent ferroptotic cell death induced by erastin, RSL3, cysteine deprivation, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. More importantly, ferroptosis‐inducing therapy selectively inhibits the growth and distant metastasis of mitophagy‐deficient tumors in vivo. In summary, patient‐derived organoids of colorectal cancer patients for screening ferroptosis‐sensitive tumors are established, providing a paradigm for identifying that patient‐derived tumors are sensitive to ferroptosis‐inducing therapies. This study concludes that mitophagy‐deficient tumors are vulnerable to ferroptosis induction, which may lead to the development of new therapeutic strategies for tumors deficient in mitophagy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis · Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism · Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou 510060 China

Department of Medical Oncology The Seventh Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat‐sen University Shenzhen 518107 China

Department of Medical Oncology Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou 510060 China

Guangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Modification and Degradation School of Basic Medical Sciences Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou 511436 China

Faculty of Health Sciences University of Macau Macau SAR 999078 China

Department of Oncology The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University Yantai 264000 China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.00310.1016/j.cell.2022.06.003 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41556-021-00818-310.1038/s41556-021-00818-3 ↗
3. 10.1126/scitranslmed.adk033010.1126/scitranslmed.adk0330 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41568-022-00459-010.1038/s41568-022-00459-0 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.aao277410.1126/science.aao2774 ↗
6. 10.1002/advs.20210117610.1002/advs.202101176 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2018.06.00510.1016/j.semcancer.2018.06.005 ↗
8. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-359010.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3590 ↗
9. 10.1038/nrc336510.1038/nrc3365 ↗
10. 10.1080/15548627.2020.185060910.1080/15548627.2020.1850609 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10549-012-2080-y10.1007/s10549-012-2080-y ↗
12. 10.1038/onc.2016.30210.1038/onc.2016.302 ↗
13. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-008610.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0086 ↗
14. 10.4161/cc.2421510.4161/cc.24215 ↗
15. 10.1038/onc.2008.19910.1038/onc.2008.199 ↗
16. 10.15252/embr.20154075910.15252/embr.201540759 ↗
17. 10.1002/advs.20190361610.1002/advs.201903616 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41580-020-00324-810.1038/s41580-020-00324-8 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41586-021-03539-710.1038/s41586-021-03539-7 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.04210.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.042 ↗
21. 10.15252/embj.202010470510.15252/embj.2020104705 ↗
22. 10.1007/s00204-024-03681-x10.1007/s00204-024-03681-x ↗
23. 10.1038/s41589-019-0408-110.1038/s41589-019-0408-1 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.04.00210.1016/j.ccell.2019.04.002 ↗
25. 10.1186/s12943-022-01530-y10.1186/s12943-022-01530-y ↗
26. 10.1038/s41422-019-0263-310.1038/s41422-019-0263-3 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41586-019-1170-y10.1038/s41586-019-1170-y ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.02.00310.1016/j.ccell.2022.02.003 ↗
29. 10.7150/ijbs.7622310.7150/ijbs.76223 ↗
30. 10.2337/diabetes.53.2007.S9610.2337/diabetes.53.2007.S96 ↗
31. 10.2478/jtim-2022-002310.2478/jtim-2022-0023 ↗
32. 10.2478/jtim-2023-008710.2478/jtim-2023-0087 ↗
33. 10.2478/jtim-2021-000510.2478/jtim-2021-0005 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.15450210.1016/j.phymed.2022.154502 ↗
35. 10.1186/s11658-024-00536-210.1186/s11658-024-00536-2 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.phymed.2023.15533110.1016/j.phymed.2023.155331 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jep.2023.11737110.1016/j.jep.2023.117371 ↗
38. 10.1002/ptr.817710.1002/ptr.8177 ↗
39. 10.1007/s00204-023-03599-w10.1007/s00204-023-03599-w ↗
40. 10.1038/s41467-020-17395-y10.1038/s41467-020-17395-y ↗
41. 10.1080/15548627.2017.138180410.1080/15548627.2017.1381804 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.livres.2023.12.00110.1016/j.livres.2023.12.001 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.livres.2023.10.00110.1016/j.livres.2023.10.001 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.livres.2023.02.00210.1016/j.livres.2023.02.002 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41580-019-0173-810.1038/s41580-019-0173-8 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81476-210.1016/S0092-8674(00)81476-2 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.07.00310.1016/j.tibs.2004.07.003 ↗