journal article·2024-07Open access

Degradation‐Based Protein Profiling: A Case Study of Celastrol

Zhihao Ni, Yi Shi, Qianlong Liu, Liguo Wang, Xiuyun Sun, Yu Rao

Advanced Science· Volume 11· Issue 25

Abstract

Abstract Natural products, while valuable for drug discovery, encounter limitations like uncertainty in targets and toxicity. As an important active ingredient in traditional Chinese medicine, celastrol exhibits a wide range of biological activities, yet its mechanism remains unclear. In this study, they introduced an innovative “Degradation‐based protein profiling (DBPP)” strategy, which combined PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTAC) technology with quantitative proteomics and Immunoprecipitation‐Mass Spectrometry (IP‐MS) techniques, to identify multiple targets of natural products using a toolbox of degraders. Taking celastrol as an example, they successfully identified its known targets, including inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase subunit beta (IKKβ), phosphatidylinositol‐4,5‐bisphosphate 3‐kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PI3Kα), and cellular inhibitor of PP2A (CIP2A), as well as potential new targets such as checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1), O‐GlcNAcase (OGA), and DNA excision repair protein ERCC‐6‐like (ERCC6L). Furthermore, the first glycosidase degrader is developed in this work. Finally, by employing a mixed PROTAC toolbox in quantitative proteomics, they also achieved multi‐target identification of celastrol, significantly reducing costs while improving efficiency. Taken together, they believe that the DBPP strategy can complement existing target identification strategies, thereby facilitating the rapid advancement of the pharmaceutical field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways · Natural Compounds in Disease Treatment · Protein Degradation and Inhibitors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

MOE Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences School of Pharmaceutical Sciences MOE Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Phosphorus Chemistry & Chemical Biology Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 China

Changping Laboratory Beijing 102206 China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b0128510.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01285 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10295-015-1723-510.1007/s10295-015-1723-5 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ddtec.2017.03.00310.1016/j.ddtec.2017.03.003 ↗
4. 10.6023/A1504022310.6023/A15040223 ↗
5. 10.1021/acscentsci.7b0013410.1021/acscentsci.7b00134 ↗
6. 10.1038/srep0789610.1038/srep07896 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.11.00310.1016/j.cbpa.2019.11.003 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41392-022-00999-910.1038/s41392-022-00999-9 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.05.01210.1016/j.actbio.2016.05.012 ↗
10. Han L. P. · Int. J. Mol. Med. · 2018 · 42 · 2053
11. 10.1080/10717544.2018.142577810.1080/10717544.2018.1425778 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.02.02210.1016/j.autrev.2012.02.022 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.11.02910.1016/j.intimp.2018.11.029 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.08.03510.1016/j.phrs.2016.08.035 ↗
15. 10.3390/antiox901003710.3390/antiox9010037 ↗
16. 10.3233/JAD-13179910.3233/JAD-131799 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41591-019-0358-x10.1038/s41591-019-0358-x ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.01110.1016/j.cell.2015.05.011 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.yexmp.2015.03.03110.1016/j.yexmp.2015.03.031 ↗
20. 10.1186/1475-2867-13-5010.1186/1475-2867-13-50 ↗
21. 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-042010.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0420 ↗
22. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.31586110.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.315861 ↗
23. 10.1074/jbc.M109.05153210.1074/jbc.M109.051532 ↗
24. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-452910.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4529 ↗
25. 10.1021/acschembio.2c0001110.1021/acschembio.2c00011 ↗
26. 10.1021/acschembio.2c0009910.1021/acschembio.2c00099 ↗
27. 10.3389/fphar.2020.55874110.3389/fphar.2020.558741 ↗
28. 10.3389/fphar.2016.0040210.3389/fphar.2016.00402 ↗
29. 10.1038/nrc311410.1038/nrc3114 ↗
30. 10.1038/nchembio.79710.1038/nchembio.797 ↗
31. 10.1126/science.122227810.1126/science.1222278 ↗
32. 10.1002/med.2175110.1002/med.21751 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.08.01410.1016/j.bcp.2006.08.014 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10495-012-0767-510.1007/s10495-012-0767-5 ↗
35. 10.1002/cam4.271910.1002/cam4.2719 ↗
36. 10.3389/fphar.2020.0002510.3389/fphar.2020.00025 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.03.00810.1016/j.molcel.2017.03.008 ↗
38. 10.4049/jimmunol.160130110.4049/jimmunol.1601301 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.bmc.2019.11517410.1016/j.bmc.2019.115174 ↗
40. 10.3389/fmolb.2022.86676410.3389/fmolb.2022.866764 ↗
41. 10.1126/science.123360610.1126/science.1233606 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.05710.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.057 ↗
43. 10.1155/2019/679395710.1155/2019/6793957 ↗
44. 10.1007/s00018-013-1307-310.1007/s00018-013-1307-3 ↗
45. 10.1007/s11684-023-1027-510.1007/s11684-023-1027-5 ↗
46. 10.1038/nprot.2014.13810.1038/nprot.2014.138 ↗
47. 10.1371/journal.pone.016838710.1371/journal.pone.0168387 ↗
48. 10.1089/omi.2011.011810.1089/omi.2011.0118 ↗
49. 10.1093/nar/gky86910.1093/nar/gky869 ↗
50. 10.1093/nar/gkab108110.1093/nar/gkab1081 ↗