journal article·2024-10Open access

Personalized Vascularized Models of Breast Cancer Desmoplasia Reveal Biomechanical Determinants of Drug Delivery to the Tumor

Giovanni S. Offeddu, Elena Cambria, Sarah E. Shelton, Kristina Haase, Zhengpeng Wan, Luca Possenti, Huu Tuan Nguyen, Mark R. Gillrie, Dean Hickman, Charles G. Knutson, Roger D. Kamm

Advanced Science· Volume 11· Issue 38

Abstract

Abstract Desmoplasia in breast cancer leads to heterogeneity in physical properties of the tissue, resulting in disparities in drug delivery and treatment efficacy among patients, thus contributing to high disease mortality. Personalized in vitro breast cancer models hold great promise for high‐throughput testing of therapeutic strategies to normalize the aberrant microenvironment in a patient‐specific manner. Here, tumoroids assembled from breast cancer cell lines (MCF7, SKBR3, and MDA‐MB‐468) and patient‐derived breast tumor cells (TCs) cultured in microphysiological systems including perfusable microvasculature reproduce key aspects of stromal and vascular dysfunction causing impaired drug delivery. Models containing SKBR3 and MDA‐MB‐468 tumoroids show higher stromal hyaluronic acid (HA) deposition, vascular permeability, interstitial fluid pressure (IFP), and degradation of vascular HA relative to models containing MCF7 tumoroids or models without tumoroids. Interleukin 8 (IL8) secretion is found responsible for vascular dysfunction and loss of vascular HA. Interventions targeting IL8 or stromal HA normalize vascular permeability, perfusion, and IFP, and ultimately enhance drug delivery and TC death in response to perfusion with trastuzumab and cetuximab. Similar responses are observed in patient‐derived models. These microphysiological systems can thus be personalized by using patient‐derived cells and can be applied to discover new molecular therapies for the normalization of the tumor microenvironment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cancer Cells and Metastasis · Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biological Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA 02139 USA

European Molecular Biology Laboratory European Molecular Biology Laboratory Barcelona Barcelona 08003 Spain

LaBS Department of Chemistry Materials and Chemical Engineering Politecnico di Milano Milan 20133 Italy

Data Science Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan 20133 Italy

Department of Medicine Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases University of Calgary Calgary Alberta T2N 2T9 Canada

Amgen Research Amgen Inc. 360 Binney Street Cambridge MA 02142 USA

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung · National Cancer Institute · Fondazione AIRC per la ricerca sul cancro ETS · American-Italian Cancer Foundation · Amgen

References (74)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3389/fmed.2017.0022710.3389/fmed.2017.00227 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.gendis.2018.05.00110.1016/j.gendis.2018.05.001 ↗
3. 10.1186/bcr28710.1186/bcr287 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41467-020-18794-x10.1038/s41467-020-18794-x ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matbio.2020.05.00410.1016/j.matbio.2020.05.004 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41568-023-00656-510.1038/s41568-023-00656-5 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.03.04010.1016/j.physbeh.2017.03.040 ↗
8. 10.3389/fmolb.2019.0016010.3389/fmolb.2019.00160 ↗
9. 10.1038/nrc145610.1038/nrc1456 ↗
10. 10.1038/d41587-019-00019-210.1038/d41587-019-00019-2 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.03.01310.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.03.013 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.01710.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.017 ↗
13. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-083310.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0833 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.04510.1016/j.cell.2015.02.045 ↗
15. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.69421810.3389/fbioe.2021.694218 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41378-021-00277-810.1038/s41378-021-00277-8 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.trecan.2015.12.00310.1016/j.trecan.2015.12.003 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cobme.2019.12.01110.1016/j.cobme.2019.12.011 ↗
19. 10.1039/C8LC00322J10.1039/C8LC00322J ↗
20. 10.1146/annurev-fluid-072220-01384510.1146/annurev-fluid-072220-013845 ↗
21. 10.1002/adhm.20190141010.1002/adhm.201901410 ↗
22. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.66050210.3389/fbioe.2021.660502 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20200244410.1002/adfm.202002444 ↗
24. 10.7150/jca.1845710.7150/jca.18457 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.addr.2015.12.01710.1016/j.addr.2015.12.017 ↗
26. Sheng Y. · Mol. Cell. Biochem. · 2021 · 2
27. 10.3390/cancers704090210.3390/cancers7040902 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.09210.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.092 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.07.02610.1016/j.yexcr.2005.07.026 ↗
30. 10.1007/BF0004636410.1007/BF00046364 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.06.00210.1016/j.ctrv.2011.06.002 ↗
32. Applegate L. A. · Eur. Biopharm. Rev. · 2010 · 28
33. 10.1002/smll.20190239310.1002/smll.201902393 ↗
34. 10.1006/mvre.1999.217710.1006/mvre.1999.2177 ↗
35. 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.04010.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.040 ↗
36. Netti P. A. · Cancer Res. · 2000 · 60 · 2497
37. M.Soltani M.Sefidgar H.Bazmara C.Marcus R. M.Subramaniam A.Rahmim in2015 IEEE Nuclear Science Symp. and Medical Imaging Conf. NSS/MIC IEEE Piscataway NJ 2016 https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2015.7582238.10.1109/NSSMIC.2015.7582238 ↗
38. 10.1093/jnen/61.8.72510.1093/jnen/61.8.725 ↗
39. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.15195910.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.151959 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.07.02210.1016/j.ajpath.2019.07.022 ↗
41. 10.1038/onc.2012.54210.1038/onc.2012.542 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.06.01010.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.06.010 ↗
43. 10.1152/ajpheart.00894.200810.1152/ajpheart.00894.2008 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.05.02210.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.05.022 ↗
45. 10.1038/s42003-021-01774-210.1038/s42003-021-01774-2 ↗
46. 10.1007/s00395-008-0749-510.1007/s00395-008-0749-5 ↗
47. 10.1089/jir.2014.002610.1089/jir.2014.0026 ↗
48. 10.4049/jimmunol.170.6.336910.4049/jimmunol.170.6.3369 ↗
49. 10.1074/jbc.M70077320010.1074/jbc.M700773200 ↗
50. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-452110.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4521 ↗
51. 10.1002/advs.20200191710.1002/advs.202001917 ↗
52. 10.1186/s13045-018-0605-510.1186/s13045-018-0605-5 ↗
53. 10.1074/jbc.M111.27859810.1074/jbc.M111.278598 ↗
54. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64757-810.1016/S0002-9440(10)64757-8 ↗
55. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-369610.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3696 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.05.01010.1016/j.ijcard.2022.05.010 ↗
57. 10.1007/s13239-020-00485-910.1007/s13239-020-00485-9 ↗
58. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-081210.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0812 ↗
59. 10.1089/jir.2013.002310.1089/jir.2013.0023 ↗
60. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0786510.1021/acsnano.8b07865 ↗
61. 10.3892/ijo.2015.281610.3892/ijo.2015.2816 ↗
62. 10.1073/pnas.111761010910.1073/pnas.1117610109 ↗
63. 10.3389/fcell.2018.0004810.3389/fcell.2018.00048 ↗
64. 10.1038/modpathol.2011.410.1038/modpathol.2011.4 ↗
65. 10.1002/jmri.2350710.1002/jmri.23507 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.breast.2012.07.00810.1016/j.breast.2012.07.008 ↗
67. Bujor I. S. · In Vivo (Brooklyn). · 2018 · 32 · 79
68. 10.1002/path.608210.1002/path.6082 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.12103210.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121032 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.11033010.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110330 ↗
71. 10.1002/advs.20190087810.1002/advs.201900878 ↗
72. K.Haase F.Piatti M.Marcano Y.Shin R.Visone A.Redaelli M.Rasponi R. D.Kamm bioRxiv 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121248.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121248 ↗
73. Scallan J. · 2010
74. 10.1038/s41596-021-00635-w10.1038/s41596-021-00635-w ↗