Cellulose‐Based Transparent Edible Antibacterial Oxygen‐Barrier Coating for Long‐Term Fruit Preservation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Long‐term preservation of fresh fruit and vegetables without a cold chain is a great challenge to food security because fruits and vegetables are highly vulnerable to poor storage conditions. Fruit spoilage is a complex biochemical process that involves many factors, including microbial reproduction, oxidation, metabolism, and H 2 O evaporation. Only the synergy of the multiple spoilage inhibition methods can achieve long‐term freshness preservation. Herein, a multifunctional cellulose‐based preservation coating with antibacterial, oxygen/water vapor barrier, and antioxidant properties is proposed, which is based on cellulose microgel (CMG) and prepared using multi‐component composites with montmorillonite (MMT), cationic cellulose derivative (Cell‐P + ), and L‐ascorbic acid (Vc). It has good wetting properties on fruits with different surfaces. This method can successfully preserve the long‐term freshness of various fruits. This highly transparent, edible, and washable multifunctional cellulose‐based fruit preservation coating can improve the quality of agricultural products, extend the shelf life of food, and reduce the cost of cold‐chain transportation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences CAS Key Laboratory of Engineering Plastics Institute of Chemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Beijing 100190 China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences · Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. G. R. F.Crises http://www.fao.org/family‐farming/detail/en/c/1410395/(accessed: May2021).
2. 10.1126/sciadv.aba294610.1126/sciadv.aba2946 ↗
3. Olivier J. · 2013
4. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0109410.1021/acsnano.3c01094 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20190829110.1002/adma.201908291 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.aaf297810.1126/science.aaf2978 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0099710.1021/acsnano.1c00997 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tifs.2009.05.00210.1016/j.tifs.2009.05.002 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.01.00610.1016/j.fpsl.2018.01.006 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cofs.2021.09.00310.1016/j.cofs.2021.09.003 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.05010.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.050 ↗
12. 10.1002/jsfa.465310.1002/jsfa.4653 ↗
13. 10.1038/s43016-022-00523-w10.1038/s43016-022-00523-w ↗
14. 10.1042/bj214065710.1042/bj2140657 ↗
15. 10.1080/10408398.2022.213613610.1080/10408398.2022.2136136 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep2526310.1038/srep25263 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.12004810.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120048 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.02210.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.022 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.11358410.1016/j.lwt.2022.113584 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11588410.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115884 ↗
21. 10.1039/c0cs00108b10.1039/c0cs00108b ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20170377910.1002/adma.201703779 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.01610.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.016 ↗
24. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1998.tb05271.x10.1111/j.1365-2672.1998.tb05271.x ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12131710.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121317 ↗
26. 10.1111/1541-4337.1228110.1111/1541-4337.12281 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.15450210.1103/PhysRevLett.104.154502 ↗