Precise Ultrasound Neuromodulation in a Deep Brain Region Using Nano Gas Vesicles as Actuators
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Ultrasound is a promising new modality for non‐invasive neuromodulation. Applied transcranially, it can be focused down to the millimeter or centimeter range. The ability to improve the treatment's spatial resolution to a targeted brain region could help to improve its effectiveness, depending upon the application. The present paper details a neurostimulation scheme using gas‐filled nanostructures, gas vesicles (GVs), as actuators for improving the efficacy and precision of ultrasound stimuli. Sonicated primary neurons display dose‐dependent, repeatable Ca2+ responses, closely synced to stimuli, and increased nuclear expression of the activation marker c‐Fos in the presence of GVs. GV‐mediated ultrasound triggered rapid and reversible Ca2+ responses in vivo and could selectively evoke neuronal activation in a deep‐seated brain region. Further investigation indicate that mechanosensitive ion channels are important mediators of this effect. GVs themselves and the treatment scheme are also found not to induce significant cytotoxicity, apoptosis, or membrane poration in treated cells. Altogether, this study demonstrates a simple and effective method to achieve enhanced and better‐targeted neurostimulation with non‐invasive low‐intensity ultrasound.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications · Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging · Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hung Hom Hong Kong SAR 999077 P. R. China
Funding
Hong Kong Polytechnic University · Innovation and Technology Commission - Hong Kong · Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conb.2018.04.01110.1016/j.conb.2018.04.011 ↗
2. 10.1038/nprot.2011.37110.1038/nprot.2011.371 ↗
3. 10.1109/TBME.2018.282120110.1109/TBME.2018.2821201 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.05810.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.058 ↗
5. 10.3171/2016.11.JNS1697610.3171/2016.11.JNS16976 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.10.00110.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.10.001 ↗
7. 10.7554/eLife.4054110.7554/eLife.40541 ↗
8. 10.1002/hbm.2398110.1002/hbm.23981 ↗
9. 10.1038/srep3402610.1038/srep34026 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41598-018-28320-110.1038/s41598-018-28320-1 ↗
11. Ai L. · 2016 · 1758
12. Lee W. · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 34026
13. 10.1038/nn.362010.1038/nn.3620 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.brs.2014.08.00810.1016/j.brs.2014.08.008 ↗
15. 10.1002/advs.20190258310.1002/advs.201902583 ↗
16. 10.1002/ana.2493310.1002/ana.24933 ↗
17. 10.1002/mds.2780910.1002/mds.27809 ↗
18. 10.1002/mds.2780510.1002/mds.27805 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30403-910.1016/S1474-4422(17)30403-9 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.04.00810.1016/j.yebeh.2015.04.008 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.mehy.2015.01.03010.1016/j.mehy.2015.01.030 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-019-12426-910.1038/s41467-019-12426-9 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.02.01210.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.02.012 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.isci.2019.10.03710.1016/j.isci.2019.10.037 ↗
25. 10.1038/nrn338310.1038/nrn3383 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.03310.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.033 ↗
27. 10.1126/science.aaq114410.1126/science.aaq1144 ↗
28. 10.1126/science.126182110.1126/science.1261821 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0056210.1021/acsnano.0c00562 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0420010.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04200 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.08.00410.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.08.004 ↗
32. 10.1007/BF0042490810.1007/BF00424908 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.03410.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.034 ↗
34. Honary S. · Trop. J. Pharm. Res. · 2013 · 12 · 265
35. 10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.10211610.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102116 ↗
36. 10.1128/mr.58.1.94-144.199410.1128/mr.58.1.94-144.1994 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0088610.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00886 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.10803310.1016/j.celrep.2020.108033 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.10039310.1016/j.xpro.2021.100393 ↗
40. Chaudhuri A. · Acta Neurobiol. Exp. · 2000 · 60 · 40310.55782/ane-2000-1359 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.09.03110.1016/j.jconrel.2009.09.031 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.02.07210.1016/j.bpj.2009.02.072 ↗
43. 10.1073/pnas.101161410710.1073/pnas.1011614107 ↗
44. 10.1073/pnas.171390511510.1073/pnas.1713905115 ↗
45. 10.1385/CBB:45:2:16710.1385/CBB:45:2:167 ↗
46. 10.1073/pnas.87.7.246610.1073/pnas.87.7.2466 ↗
47. S.Yoo D. R.Mittelstein R.Hurt J.Lacroix M. G.Shapiro bioRxiv 2020.05.19.1011962020.
48. 10.1038/s41598-021-85535-510.1038/s41598-021-85535-5 ↗
49. 10.1038/s41598-019-43775-610.1038/s41598-019-43775-6 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0316210.1021/acsnano.5b03162 ↗
51. 10.1038/s41467-020-14706-110.1038/s41467-020-14706-1 ↗
52. 10.1073/pnas.191438711610.1073/pnas.1914387116 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.02.01010.1016/j.jconrel.2021.02.010 ↗
54. 10.1038/nnano.2014.3210.1038/nnano.2014.32 ↗
55. 10.1038/srep2417010.1038/srep24170 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0093510.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00935 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.02110.1016/j.cub.2019.08.021 ↗
58. 10.7554/eLife.2706910.7554/eLife.27069 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.11980310.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119803 ↗
60. 10.2217/nnm.10.13110.2217/nnm.10.131 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.04410.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.044 ↗
62. Dong Q. · BioMed. Res. Int. · 2018 · 2018 · 6501508
63. 10.7150/thno.1598710.7150/thno.15987 ↗
64. 10.7150/thno.2686910.7150/thno.26869 ↗
65. 10.1126/science.aax480410.1126/science.aax4804 ↗
66. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02796.x10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02796.x ↗