journal article·2025-10

Excitation and Momentum Resolved Multi‐Polaritonic Emission Mapping in Organic‐Inorganic Microcavity

Jhuma Dutta, Nitin Yadav, Ben Johns, Jino George

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 13· Issue 29
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Hybridization of an organic Frenkel exciton (layer‐by‐layer TDBC) and an inorganic Wannier‐Mott exciton (WS 2 monolayer) results in the formation of a multi‐polaritonic system. Such a hybrid platform offers an excellent way of engineering the emission through the coupled states. This article demonstrates the mapping of dispersion characteristics of multi‐polaritonic emission using excitation and momentum resolved, Fourier‐plane micro‐spectroscopy. Further, the contribution of photon fractions is correlated to the emission of the polaritonic branches. For example, an increase in the photon fraction of the middle polaritonic state is observed at certain momenta in the Fourier space, thereby amplifying the emission population density. The competition between the middle and lower polaritonic states is tested at various cavity detuning conditions and found to be in accordance with the modeling. This work has potential implications and helps to design future‐generation optoelectronic and photonic devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Strong Light-Matter Interactions · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies · Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Molecular Strong Coupling Lab Department of Chemical Sciences Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Mohali SAS Nagar Punjab 140306 India

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11664-021-09338-010.1007/s11664-021-09338-0 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.abd033610.1126/science.abd0336 ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20230605810.1002/adfm.202306058 ↗
4. 10.1002/adom.20130025610.1002/adom.201300256 ↗
5. 10.1039/C8CS00193F10.1039/C8CS00193F ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ssc.2018.09.00110.1016/j.ssc.2018.09.001 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.23521110.1103/PhysRevB.74.235211 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.07640110.1103/PhysRevLett.112.076401 ↗
9. 10.1039/C8CS00159F10.1039/C8CS00159F ↗
10. 10.1016/S0038-1098(96)00433-410.1016/S0038-1098(96)00433-4 ↗
11. 10.1088/0953-8984/10/42/00510.1088/0953-8984/10/42/005 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0069510.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00695 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0659210.1021/acsnano.6b06592 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41377-019-0180-810.1038/s41377-019-0180-8 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c0151110.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01511 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0086710.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00867 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20050023310.1002/adma.200500233 ↗
18. 10.1038/srep0921810.1038/srep09218 ↗
19. 10.1039/C5CS00275C10.1039/C5CS00275C ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.07680210.1103/PhysRevLett.113.076802 ↗
21. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.28210.1038/nphoton.2015.282 ↗
22. 10.1021/jz500443910.1021/jz5004439 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b0145910.1021/acsphotonics.8b01459 ↗
24. 10.1088/2053-1583/1/1/01100210.1088/2053-1583/1/1/011002 ↗
25. 10.1038/nnano.2010.17210.1038/nnano.2010.172 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0147510.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01475 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.726910.1103/PhysRevB.58.7269 ↗
28. 10.1080/00107514.2022.210174910.1080/00107514.2022.2101749 ↗
29. 10.1002/pssr.20200058010.1002/pssr.202000580 ↗
30. 10.1364/OE.27.01661310.1364/OE.27.016613 ↗
31. 10.1038/nmat395010.1038/nmat3950 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0100210.1021/acsphotonics.7b01002 ↗
33. 10.1002/adom.20160033710.1002/adom.201600337 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41563-022-01463-310.1038/s41563-022-01463-3 ↗
35. 10.1038/s41467-021-25656-710.1038/s41467-021-25656-7 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41467-023-36618-610.1038/s41467-023-36618-6 ↗