Achieving γ‐Phase CsPbI3 by Reducing Underlayer Surface Roughness
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Cesium lead iodide (CsPbI3) exhibits great potential in developing photovoltaic cells due to suitable optical bandgap and thermal stability. However, the photoactive γ‐phase normally exists at high‐temperatures ≈180 °C, and it is challenging to obtain γ‐phase CsPbI3 at room temperature. Here, it discovers that γ‐phase CsPbI3 is achievable by reducing the underlayer surface roughness to a certain level. This method is universal as demonstrated on the surface of poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS), poly[bis(4‐phenyl)(2,4,6‐trimethylphenyl)amine] (PTAA), polystyrene (PS), and silicon substrates. Moreover, it is found that lower surface roughness resulted in smaller crystallite size in the CsPbI3 film, which is an important reason for achieving γ‐phase because the decrease in crystallite size will increase grain surface energy to suppress tilting of PbI6 octahedra and lattice distortion. This study offers a universal approach to obtain γ‐phase CsPbI3 for the development of high‐performance all‐inorganic perovskite solar cells and other optoelectronic devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Materials Science and Engineering Hunan University Changsha Hunan 410082 China
Hunan Key Laboratory of Super‐microstructure and Ultrafast Process School of Physics Central South University Changsha Hunan 410083 China
School of Aerospace Engineering Beijing Institute of Technology Beijing 100081 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20200541010.1002/adma.202005410 ↗
2. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.8010.1038/nphoton.2013.80 ↗
3. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.34210.1038/nphoton.2013.342 ↗
4. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.10210.1038/nenergy.2017.102 ↗
5. 10.1038/srep2168710.1038/srep21687 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0117610.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01176 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20190319110.1002/aenm.201903191 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20220645110.1002/adma.202206451 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41467-020-20745-510.1038/s41467-020-20745-5 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-022-35255-910.1038/s41467-022-35255-9 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.06.01310.1016/j.joule.2018.06.013 ↗
12. 10.1039/D1TA01252E10.1039/D1TA01252E ↗
13. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.11.02010.1016/j.joule.2020.11.020 ↗
14. 10.1002/cssc.20170165310.1002/cssc.201701653 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.aav868010.1126/science.aav8680 ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20190108110.1002/anie.201901081 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0026710.1021/acsnano.8b00267 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0180810.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01808 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467-018-03169-010.1038/s41467-018-03169-0 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0227210.1021/acsenergylett.9b02272 ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20190055510.1002/aenm.201900555 ↗
22. 10.1038/s43246-021-00134-110.1038/s43246-021-00134-1 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jssc.2023.12408710.1016/j.jssc.2023.124087 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20221022310.1002/adma.202210223 ↗
25. 10.1039/D0TA02210A10.1039/D0TA02210A ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-020-18380-110.1038/s41467-020-18380-1 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.03410.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.034 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0121910.1021/acsenergylett.2c01219 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41467-018-06915-610.1038/s41467-018-06915-6 ↗
30. 10.1002/adfm.20221441410.1002/adfm.202214414 ↗
31. 10.1002/aenm.20190375110.1002/aenm.201903751 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0173910.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01739 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0078910.1021/acsnano.3c00789 ↗
34. 10.1039/C9TC06465F10.1039/C9TC06465F ↗
35. 10.1126/science.aag270010.1126/science.aag2700 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0082010.1021/acsenergylett.8b00820 ↗
37. 10.1002/smll.20200524610.1002/smll.202005246 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c0206010.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02060 ↗