journal article·2021-07

Organic Doping at Ultralow Concentrations

Raj Kishen Radha Krishnan, Shiyi Liu, Drona Dahal, Pushpa Raj Paudel, Björn Lüssem

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 9· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Organic doping is widely used for defining the majority charge carriers of organic thin films, tuning the Fermi level, and improving and stabilizing the performance of organic light‐emitting diodes and organic solar cells. However, in contrast to inorganic semiconductors, the doping concentrations commonly used are quite high (in the wt% range). Such high concentrations not only limit the scope of doping in organic field‐effect transistors (OFETs), but also limit the doping process itself resulting in a low doping efficiency. Here, the mechanism of doping at ultralow doping concentrations is studied. Doped C60 metal‐oxide‐semiconductor (MOS) junctions are used to study doping at the 100 ppm level. With the help of a small‐signal drift‐diffusion model, it is possible to disentangle effects of traps at the gate dielectric/organic semiconductor interface from effects of doping and to determine the doping efficiency and activation energy of the doping process. Doped C60 OFETs with an ultralow operation voltage of 800 mV and an excellent on/off ratio of up to 107 are realized. The devices have low subthreshold swing in the range of 80 mV dec−1 and a large transconductance of up to 8 mS mm−1.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics Kent State University Kent OH 44242 USA

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Jain A. · 2018 · 19
2. 10.1021/cr050156n10.1021/cr050156n ↗
3. 10.1038/nature0800310.1038/nature08003 ↗
4. 10.1002/advs.20190341910.1002/advs.201903419 ↗
5. 10.1002/solr.20170015810.1002/solr.201700158 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20180183010.1002/adma.201801830 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0032910.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00329 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.0c1253410.1021/acsami.0c12534 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20160107510.1002/adma.201601075 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.04.02910.1016/j.orgel.2018.04.029 ↗
11. 10.1002/smll.20180519610.1002/smll.201805196 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2019.11628910.1016/j.synthmet.2019.116289 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.217821310.1063/1.2178213 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.6b1114910.1021/acsami.6b11149 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.orgel.2011.09.02710.1016/j.orgel.2011.09.027 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.19520510.1103/PhysRevB.88.195205 ↗
17. 10.1002/adfm.20140454910.1002/adfm.201404549 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20180123610.1002/adma.201801236 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467-019-12526-610.1038/s41467-019-12526-6 ↗
20. 10.1039/c3tc32431a10.1039/c3tc32431a ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.17660110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.176601 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.477255110.1063/1.4772551 ↗
23. 10.1007/978-3-540-93804-010.1007/978-3-540-93804-0 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467-018-03302-z10.1038/s41467-018-03302-z ↗
25. 10.1021/ja211382x10.1021/ja211382x ↗
26. S.Liu Ph.D. Thesis Kent State University2019.
27. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2019.03.00210.1016/j.synthmet.2019.03.002 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.473930310.1063/1.4739303 ↗
29. 10.1002/aelm.20190010910.1002/aelm.201900109 ↗
30. 10.1038/ncomms377510.1038/ncomms3775 ↗
31. 10.1038/nature0553310.1038/nature05533 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20110426910.1002/adma.201104269 ↗