Local Charge Transport at the Interface of Semiconductor and Charge Transport Mediator
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Charge transport mediators are commonly used in photoelectronic devices to promote selective charge transport and mitigate carrier losses. However, related investigations are mainly carried out by the trial‐and‐error method, and a deeper understanding of its local charge transport behavior is still lacking. Herein, a comprehensive study is performed on a BiVO4/Ti3C2 photoanode to reveal its local charge transport properties by combing microprobe technologies and numerical computations. For the first time, a nano‐Schottky junction is directly shown at the BiVO4/Ti3C2 interface and the band bending is quantified with promoted hole transport and prolonged photocarrier's lifetime. These mechanistic insights leverage a path to further optimize performance through interface engineering and achieve a photocurrent of 5.38 mA cm−2 at 1.23 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode. This work provides deeper insight into the function of charge transport mediators in view of interface contact rather than material nature and demonstrates a strategy to improve photoelectrochemical performance through Fermi‐level engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Physical Science and Technology Lanzhou University Lanzhou 730000 China
Coreless Technologies, Inc Santa Cruz CA 95060 USA
Chemical Science Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley CA 94720 USA
Funding
Lanzhou University · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0953-8984/27/28/28320310.1088/0953-8984/27/28/283203 ↗
2. 10.1039/c3cp50540e10.1039/c3cp50540e ↗
3. 10.1038/3510460710.1038/35104607 ↗
4. 10.1557/JMR.2010.002010.1557/JMR.2010.0020 ↗
5. 10.1039/D0EE02397C10.1039/D0EE02397C ↗
6. 10.1088/1361-6463/aa673810.1088/1361-6463/aa6738 ↗
7. 10.1039/C2EE22618A10.1039/C2EE22618A ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.17640110.1103/PhysRevLett.126.176401 ↗
9. 10.1021/jacs.7b1066210.1021/jacs.7b10662 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.05910.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.059 ↗
11. 10.1039/C7NR05285E10.1039/C7NR05285E ↗
12. 10.1039/C9CC07108C10.1039/C9CC07108C ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20200213610.1002/anie.202002136 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.08610.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.086 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.12.14610.1016/j.cej.2018.12.146 ↗
16. 10.1021/jp308591k10.1021/jp308591k ↗
17. 10.1038/s41563-019-0488-z10.1038/s41563-019-0488-z ↗
18. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.05.00210.1016/j.materresbull.2015.05.002 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0509310.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05093 ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20200770610.1002/anie.202007706 ↗
21. 10.1021/jacs.7b0447010.1021/jacs.7b04470 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0279910.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02799 ↗
23. 10.1002/anie.20150413510.1002/anie.201504135 ↗
24. 10.1002/advs.20200114810.1002/advs.202001148 ↗
25. 10.1002/anie.20191284410.1002/anie.201912844 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-018-04856-810.1038/s41467-018-04856-8 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11985510.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119855 ↗
28. 10.1039/C8EE00125A10.1039/C8EE00125A ↗
29. 10.18321/ectj19410.18321/ectj194 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0029710.1021/acsaem.9b00297 ↗
31. 10.1021/jp206798d10.1021/jp206798d ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0244410.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02444 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.495909010.1063/1.4959090 ↗
34. 10.1002/adfm.20200399810.1002/adfm.202003998 ↗
35. 10.1038/ncomms1390710.1038/ncomms13907 ↗
36. 10.1039/C9CC05485E10.1039/C9CC05485E ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0664510.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06645 ↗
38. 10.1021/cm502507410.1021/cm5025074 ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20180248610.1002/adma.201802486 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0071710.1021/acsphotonics.6b00717 ↗
41. 10.1002/adfm.20200085210.1002/adfm.202000852 ↗
42. 10.1039/C9NR07242J10.1039/C9NR07242J ↗