Scaling Laws for Perovskite Nanolasers With Photonic and Hybrid Plasmonic Modes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Surface plasmons exhibit an extraordinary capability to reduce the structural size and improve light−matter interaction. However, for small‐sized plasmonic cavities, the optical diffraction limit makes the near‐field difficult to observe, complicating the analysis of exact lasing characteristics. In this study, a 4f measurement system is used to extract the mode parity from the interference pattern and reconstruct the near‐field of the hybrid plasmonic perovskite nanolasers. In conjunction with other measurements, a series of rigorous methods for determining the exact resonance mode and obtaining the precise lasing characteristics of perovskite nanolasers are described. By applying these methods, the scaling laws for wire‐type hybrid plasmonic perovskite lasers are successfully determined and an appropriate size is selected for achieving outstanding lasing performance with low threshold power consumption and a high group index. These methods can be applied to nanowire plasmon‐based lasers to advance the development of plasmonic devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies · Strong Light-Matter Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Photonics and Institute of Electro‐Optical Engineering College of Electrical and Computer Engineering National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hsinchu 30010 Taiwan
State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering Southeast University Nanjing 210096 P. R. China
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41565-019-0535-610.1038/s41565-019-0535-6 ↗
2. 10.3390/bios902005710.3390/bios9020057 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0422410.1021/acsnano.9b04224 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.bios.2008.08.01210.1016/j.bios.2008.08.012 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.01.12010.1016/j.snb.2018.01.120 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b0052510.1021/acsphotonics.8b00525 ↗
7. 10.1109/TNANO.2021.306645210.1109/TNANO.2021.3066452 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0053710.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00537 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0389010.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03890 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41377-020-0319-710.1038/s41377-020-0319-7 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467-017-01662-610.1038/s41467-017-01662-6 ↗
12. 10.1021/nl503176w10.1021/nl503176w ↗
13. 10.1063/1.512794610.1063/1.5127946 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0171310.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01713 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0164310.1021/acsnano.5b01643 ↗
16. 10.1002/lpor.20200025010.1002/lpor.202000250 ↗
17. 10.1002/adom.20180067410.1002/adom.201800674 ↗
18. 10.1039/C8NR09634A10.1039/C8NR09634A ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0246210.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02462 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b0025610.1021/acs.cgd.8b00256 ↗
21. 10.1038/nphoton.2008.13110.1038/nphoton.2008.131 ↗
22. 10.1038/nature0836410.1038/nature08364 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0395610.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03956 ↗
24. 10.1002/adom.20210029910.1002/adom.202100299 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRev.69.3710.1103/PhysRev.69.37 ↗
26. 10.1515/nanoph-2012-001710.1515/nanoph-2012-0017 ↗
27. 10.1038/srep3981310.1038/srep39813 ↗
28. 10.1364/OPN.14.11.00003010.1364/OPN.14.11.000030 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.0c2073310.1021/acsami.0c20733 ↗