journal article·2021-07Open access

Separating Physically Distinct Mechanisms in Complex Infrared Plasmonic Nanostructures via Machine Learning Enhanced Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy

Sergei V. Kalinin, Kevin M. Roccapriore, Shin Hum Cho, Delia J. Milliron, Rama Vasudevan, Maxim Ziatdinov, Jordan A. Hachtel

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 9· Issue 13

Abstract

Abstract Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) enables direct exploration of plasmonic phenomena at the nanometer level. To isolate individual plasmon modes, linear unmixing methods can be used to separate different physical mechanisms, but in larger and more complex systems the interpretability of the components becomes uncertain. Here, infrared plasmonic resonances in self‐assembled heterogeneous monolayer films of doped‐semiconductor nanoparticles are examined beyond linear unmixing techniques, and both supervised and unsupervised machine‐learning‐based analyses of hyperspectral EELS datasets are demonstrated. In the supervised approach, a human operator labels a small number of pixels in the hyperspectral dataset corresponding to features of interest which are then propagated across the entire dataset. In the unsupervised approach, non‐linear autoencoders are used to create a highly‐reduced latent‐space representation of the dataset, within which insight into the relevant physics can be gleaned from straightforward distance metrics that do not depend on operator input and bias. The advantage of these approaches is that the labeling separates physical mechanisms without altering the data, enabling robust analyses of the influence of heterogeneities in mesoscale complex systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Machine Learning in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN 37831 USA

McKetta Department of Chemical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA

Samsung Electronics Samsung Semiconductor R&D Hwaseong Gyeonggi‐do 18448 Republic of Korea

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy · Office of Science · Basic Energy Sciences · Welch Foundation

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2012.5110.1038/nnano.2012.51 ↗
2. 10.1038/nmat262910.1038/nmat2629 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat216210.1038/nmat2162 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.293073510.1063/1.2930735 ↗
5. 10.1021/nn900922z10.1021/nn900922z ↗
6. 10.1021/nl200634w10.1021/nl200634w ↗
7. 10.1039/c3cs60478k10.1039/c3cs60478k ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.17740110.1103/PhysRevLett.123.177401 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.04.01610.1016/j.ultramic.2006.04.016 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.14441310.1103/PhysRevB.79.144413 ↗
11. 10.1017/S143192760606063610.1017/S1431927606060636 ↗
12. Kotula P. G. · Scanning · 2006 · 28 · 63
13. 10.1140/epjb/e2003-00210-810.1140/epjb/e2003-00210-8 ↗
14. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.1998.3250876.x10.1046/j.1365-2818.1998.3250876.x ↗
15. 10.1016/S1076-5670(00)80020-810.1016/S1076-5670(00)80020-8 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.05.00610.1016/j.ultramic.2012.05.006 ↗
17. 10.1109/TSP.2013.224512710.1109/TSP.2013.2245127 ↗
18. 10.1186/s40679-018-0055-810.1186/s40679-018-0055-8 ↗
19. Wilson A. G. · Proceedings of Machine Learning Research · 2016 · 51 · 370
20. Gardner J. R. · Proceedings of Machine Learning Research · 2018 · 84 · 1407
21. S. V.Kalinin A. R.Lupini R. K.Vasudevan M. A.Ziatdinov arXiv:2005.10507 2020.
22. 10.1109/TGRS.2019.290875610.1109/TGRS.2019.2908756 ↗
23. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/8/08571410.1088/0957-4484/20/8/085714 ↗
24. 10.1021/nn502029b10.1021/nn502029b ↗
25. M.Tschannen O.Bachem M. J.Lucic arXiv:1812.050692018.
26. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0090610.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00906 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.513905010.1063/1.5139050 ↗
28. 10.1039/c3cs60341e10.1039/c3cs60341e ↗
29. 10.1038/ncomms1158310.1038/ncomms11583 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.11305210.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113052 ↗
31. Lee D. D. · 2001 · 556
32. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/40/40570810.1088/0957-4484/20/40/405708 ↗
33. Chollet F. · 2015
34. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0007910.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00079 ↗
35. X.Bao J.Lucas S.Sachdeva R.Grosse arXiv:2007.067312020.
36. Yu G. · IEEE Trans. Signal Process. · 2012 · 21 · 2481
37. 10.1021/nl304375710.1021/nl3043757 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.15720310.1103/PhysRevLett.103.157203 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.06410710.1103/PhysRevB.81.064107 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.02420310.1103/PhysRevB.84.024203 ↗
41. Kingma D. P. · 2014 · 3581
42. 10.1109/TIP.2017.277283610.1109/TIP.2017.2772836 ↗
43. D.Dai L.Van Gool arXiv:1602.00955 2016.
44. I. Z.Yalniz H. J.Jégou K.Chen M.Paluri D.Mahajan arXiv:1905.00546 2019.
45. 10.1093/jmicro/dfs08910.1093/jmicro/dfs089 ↗