Extending the Lasing Wavelength Coverage of Organic Semiconductor Nanofibers by Periodic Organic–Organic Heteroepitaxy
Source abstract
Abstract
Organic–organic heteropitaxy based on alternating and periodic deposition of para-sexiphenyl and alpha-sexithiophene on muscovite mica enables the fabrication of organic semiconductor nanofibers capable of random lasing with multiband emission and operating in the monomolecular recombination regime at room temperature. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Random lasers and scattering media · Photonic Crystals and Applications · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dipartimento di Fisica Università di Cagliari Complesso Universitario di Monserrato I‐09042 Monserrato‐CA Italy
Institute of Semiconductor and Solid State Physics Johannes Kepler University Linz A‐4040 Linz Austria
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr050152i10.1021/cr050152i ↗
2. 10.1002/pi.317310.1002/pi.3173 ↗
3. 10.1364/OE.18.02488110.1364/OE.18.024881 ↗
4. 10.1038/nature0343810.1038/nature03438 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.221194710.1063/1.2211947 ↗
6. 10.1364/OE.14.00921110.1364/OE.14.009211 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.290062810.1063/1.2900628 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.291243310.1063/1.2912433 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20110418210.1002/adma.201104182 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.161664510.1063/1.1616645 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.361916910.1063/1.3619169 ↗
12. 10.1088/0305-4470/38/49/00410.1088/0305-4470/38/49/004 ↗
13. 10.1038/nphys97110.1038/nphys971 ↗
14. 10.1364/OL.35.00262410.1364/OL.35.002624 ↗
15. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.9010.1038/nphoton.2012.90 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.12431410.1063/1.124314 ↗
17. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9<629::AID-ADMA629>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9<629::AID-ADMA629>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
18. 10.1063/1.142407110.1063/1.1424071 ↗
19. 10.1021/ja109729e10.1021/ja109729e ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.11540810.1103/PhysRevB.67.115408 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.216739710.1063/1.2167397 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20080050910.1002/adma.200800509 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20070104110.1002/adma.200701041 ↗
24. 10.1021/nn101888910.1021/nn1018889 ↗
25. 10.1021/nn204723510.1021/nn2047235 ↗
26. 10.1021/jp054324r10.1021/jp054324r ↗
27. 10.1063/1.32169610.1063/1.321696 ↗
28. 10.1038/nmat127910.1038/nmat1279 ↗
29. 10.1021/ja056060s10.1021/ja056060s ↗
30. The nearly monoexponential 6T decay observed for nonresonant pumping at 392 nm was qualitatively interpreted as the convolution between the impulse decay function (obtained upon 6T resonant excitation) and the activation response function related to RET.