Radiative‐Recombination Thermodynamics in Boron‐Doped Diamond
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Boron‐doped diamond is a wide‐bandgap semiconductor with excellent semiconductor properties, which is widely utilized in various applications. Till now, the thermodynamic rules governing the carrier transitions in this material have not been fully understood. In this research, the different luminescence behaviors of boron‐doped diamond under 193 nm pulse laser with high‐ and low‐ power density excitation are analyzed. Under high‐power density excitation (@≈63 kW cm−2), the emission intensity of excitons is nearly ten times higher than that of defect luminescence. Conversely, under low‐power density excitation (@≈1.4 kW cm−2, different emission peaks exhibit similar intensities, indicating a competitive relationship among them. Based on experimental and theoretical analyses, the difference is attributed to the thermodynamic distribution of carriers at varying excitation powers. Specifically, high excitation power brings an independent behavior of each emission peak, and the exciton emission is described by a phonon‐assisted radiation model; different from that, the competition among different emission centers under the condition of low excitation power cannot be neglected, and now the thermodynamic evolution of each emission peak is described by a carrier trapping‐dissociation model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies · Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies School of Materials Sun Yat‐sen University Shenzhen 518107 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.diamond.2022.10963810.1016/j.diamond.2022.109638 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2023.10116410.1016/j.mtphys.2023.101164 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0451910.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04519 ↗
4. 10.1186/s43074-021-00039-910.1186/s43074-021-00039-9 ↗
5. 10.1186/s43074-022-00054-410.1186/s43074-022-00054-4 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.diamond.2013.03.01110.1016/j.diamond.2013.03.011 ↗
7. 10.1016/0022-0248(90)90126-610.1016/0022-0248(90)90126-6 ↗
8. 10.1016/0038-1098(96)00309-210.1016/0038-1098(96)00309-2 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.35886510.1063/1.358865 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2020.11742810.1016/j.jlumin.2020.117428 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.10120810.1016/j.xcrp.2022.101208 ↗
12. 10.2138/rmg.2022.88.1210.2138/rmg.2022.88.12 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRev.133.A169810.1103/PhysRev.133.A1698 ↗
14. 10.1002/pssa.20067141010.1002/pssa.200671410 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.07.01410.1016/j.matlet.2006.07.014 ↗
16. 10.1088/0370-1328/79/6/30710.1088/0370-1328/79/6/307 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.aao556110.1126/science.aao5561 ↗
18. L.Aaron V. P.Daniel M. D.Itzhak Hemo M. D.Jacob Pe'er M. D.Hanan Zauberman Proc. SPIE 1423 Ophthalmic Technologies (1 June 1991);https://doi.org/10.1117/12.43968.10.1117/12.43968 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.11543710.1063/1.115437 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.23520510.1103/PhysRevB.106.235205 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.05740410.1103/PhysRevLett.88.057404 ↗
22. 10.1038/srep0265710.1038/srep02657 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.12520410.1103/PhysRevB.104.125204 ↗
24. 10.1016/B978-044450684-9/50091-X10.1016/B978-044450684-9/50091-X ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.05.06110.1016/j.carbon.2020.05.061 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0925-9635(96)00764-910.1016/S0925-9635(96)00764-9 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.03910.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.039 ↗
28. 10.5741/GEMS.40.1.210.5741/GEMS.40.1.2 ↗