journal article·2024-01Open access

Organic Source‐Gated Phototransistors with > 104 Photo‐To‐Dark Current Ratio in the Visible Range at Zero Gate‐Source Bias

Eva Bestelink, Ute Zschieschang, Leslie Askew, Hagen Klauk, Radu A. Sporea

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 12· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract With growing interest in organic phototransistors, as not only sensors but also neuromorphic computing elements, the vast majority of research investigates structures comprising Ohmic source/drain contacts. Here, it is shown how source‐gated transistors (SGTs), in which a source contact barrier dominates electrical characteristics, can be implemented as phototransistors. Organic photo‐SGTs (OPSGTs) based on vacuum‐processed small‐molecule dinaphtho[2,3‐b:2′,3′‐f]thieno[3,2‐]thiophene (DNTT) demonstrate low saturation voltage, exceptional tolerance to channel length variation, and photo‐to‐dark current ratio (PDCR) peaks over 106 for 819 µW broad spectrum incident light power. At zero gate‐source voltage, the PDCR reaches 104, showing promise for simple sensor circuit implementation in medical and wellbeing applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Advanced Technology Institute School of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering University of Surrey Guildford GU2 7XH UK

Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research 70569 Stuttgart Germany

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20120497910.1002/adma.201204979 ↗
2. 10.1515/9783110710687-00310.1515/9783110710687-003 ↗
3. 10.1002/lpor.20220028310.1002/lpor.202200283 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0168910.1021/acsnano.0c01689 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.apmt.2023.10188510.1016/j.apmt.2023.101885 ↗
6. 10.1109/LSENS.2023.326488110.1109/LSENS.2023.3264881 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.02.00710.1016/j.orgel.2015.02.007 ↗
8. 10.1109/LED.2003.81337910.1109/LED.2003.813379 ↗
9. 10.1109/TED.2013.226454710.1109/TED.2013.2264547 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.481750210.1063/1.4817502 ↗
11. 10.1002/advs.20210147310.1002/advs.202101473 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.04.03810.1016/j.orgel.2016.04.038 ↗
13. 10.1002/aelm.20210110110.1002/aelm.202101101 ↗
14. 10.1002/aelm.20220116310.1002/aelm.202201163 ↗
15. 10.1039/C6RA28821A10.1039/C6RA28821A ↗
16. 10.1002/aisy.20200019910.1002/aisy.202000199 ↗
17. Sporea R. A. · 2017 · 15510.1109/SMICND.2017.8101185 ↗
18. 10.1007/978-3-319-00002-210.1007/978-3-319-00002-2 ↗
19. 10.1109/TED.2010.205615110.1109/TED.2010.2056151 ↗
20. 10.1073/pnas.182075611610.1073/pnas.1820756116 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.05.01610.1016/j.synthmet.2015.05.016 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2017.11.00510.1016/j.mtcomm.2017.11.005 ↗
23. 10.1039/D3TC02474A10.1039/D3TC02474A ↗
24. 10.1073/pnas.221667212010.1073/pnas.2216672120 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.sse.2004.02.00410.1016/j.sse.2004.02.004 ↗
26. 10.1038/srep0429510.1038/srep04295 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.sse.2011.06.01010.1016/j.sse.2011.06.010 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0053210.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00532 ↗
29. 10.1002/smsc.20210011510.1002/smsc.202100115 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.177251810.1063/1.1772518 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.492111410.1063/1.4921114 ↗
32. 10.1109/TED.2021.310627610.1109/TED.2021.3106276 ↗
33. 10.1109/JPROC.2019.293080810.1109/JPROC.2019.2930808 ↗
34. 10.1149/07510.0061ecst10.1149/07510.0061ecst ↗
35. 2012
36. 10.1038/s41467-018-07424-210.1038/s41467-018-07424-2 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.508868110.1063/1.5088681 ↗
38. 10.1002/adfm.20230406410.1002/adfm.202304064 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c0401310.1021/acs.nanolett.2c04013 ↗
40. 10.1088/0268-1242/31/2/02501110.1088/0268-1242/31/2/025011 ↗
41. 10.1038/ncomms1090810.1038/ncomms10908 ↗