journal article·2021-11Open access

Understanding Differences in the Crystallization Kinetics between One‐Step Slot‐Die Coating and Spin Coating of MAPbI3 Using Multimodal In Situ Optical Spectroscopy

Konstantin Schötz, Christopher Greve, Arjan Langen, Harrie Gorter, Ilker Dogan, Yulia Galagan, Albert J. J. M. van Breemen, Gerwin H. Gelinck, Eva M. Herzig, Fabian Panzer

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 9· Issue 21

Abstract

Abstract To develop a detailed understanding about halide perovskite processing from solution, the crystallization processes are investigated during spin coating and slot‐die coating of MAPbI3 at different evaporation rates by simultaneous in situ photoluminescence, light scattering, and absorption measurements. Based on the time evolution of the optical parameters it is found that for both processing methods initially solvent‐complex‐structures form, followed by perovskite crystallization. The latter proceeds in two stages for spin coating, while for slot‐die coating only one perovskite crystallization phase occurs. For both processing methods, it is found that with increasing evaporation rates, the crystallization kinetics of the solvent‐complex structure and the perovskite crystallization remain constant on a relative time scale, whereas the duration of the second perovskite crystallization in spin coating increases. This second perovskite crystallization appears restricted due to differences in solvent‐complex phase morphologies from which the perovskite forms. The work emphasizes the importance of the exact precursor state properties on the perovskite formation. It further demonstrates that detailed analyses of multimodal optical in situ spectroscopy allows gaining a fundamental understanding of the crystallization processes that take place during solution processing of halide perovskites, independent from the specific processing method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Soft Matter Optoelectronics University of Bayreuth 95440 Bayreuth Germany

Dynamics and Structure Formation ‐ Herzig Group University of Bayreuth 95440 Bayreuth Germany

TNO Holst Centre Eindhoven 5656 AE Netherlands

TNO Biobased and Circular Technologies Auvergnedijk 2 Bergen op Zoom 4612 PZ Netherlands

TNO Partner of Solliance Eindhoven 5656 AE Netherlands

Department of Materials Science and Engineering National Taiwan University Taipei 10617 Taiwan

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. N. R. E. LaboratoryBest Research‐Cell Efficiency Chart www.nrel.gov/pv/assets/pdfs/best‐research‐cell‐efficiencies.20200104.pdf (accessed: April 2021).
2. 10.1126/science.122860410.1126/science.1228604 ↗
3. 10.1038/srep0059110.1038/srep00591 ↗
4. 10.1021/ja809598r10.1021/ja809598r ↗
5. 10.1002/aenm.20200307310.1002/aenm.202003073 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0042810.1021/acsenergylett.8b00428 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.aam662010.1126/science.aam6620 ↗
8. 10.1039/C6EE01623E10.1039/C6EE01623E ↗
9. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.8110.1038/nenergy.2016.81 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.aaa927210.1126/science.aaa9272 ↗
11. 10.1039/C4EE03907F10.1039/C4EE03907F ↗
12. 10.1021/ja505556s10.1021/ja505556s ↗
13. 10.1002/advs.20200335910.1002/advs.202003359 ↗
14. 10.3389/fmats.2021.63522410.3389/fmats.2021.635224 ↗
15. 10.1002/aenm.20200175310.1002/aenm.202001753 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20170640110.1002/adma.201706401 ↗
17. 10.1038/ncomms1568810.1038/ncomms15688 ↗
18. 10.1039/D0TA00048E10.1039/D0TA00048E ↗
19. 10.1002/aenm.20190307410.1002/aenm.201903074 ↗
20. 10.1002/ente.20190034310.1002/ente.201900343 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20180754410.1002/adfm.201807544 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b0624810.1021/acs.jpca.8b06248 ↗
23. 10.1039/C8TA01642A10.1039/C8TA01642A ↗
24. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.09.01410.1016/j.joule.2018.09.014 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c1076510.1021/acs.jpca.0c10765 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20200353410.1002/aenm.202003534 ↗
27. Suchan K. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2020 · 8
28. 10.1038/s41467-021-21803-210.1038/s41467-021-21803-2 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.0c2263010.1021/acsami.0c22630 ↗
30. 10.1002/adfm.20190833710.1002/adfm.201908337 ↗
31. 10.1002/adfm.20200175210.1002/adfm.202001752 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0846810.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08468 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41467-021-22049-810.1038/s41467-021-22049-8 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.09.01110.1016/j.joule.2020.09.011 ↗
35. 10.1126/science.aaa047210.1126/science.aaa0472 ↗
36. 10.1038/nmat401410.1038/nmat4014 ↗
37. Galagan Y. · Oxford Open Mater. Sci. · 2021 · 1
38. 10.1039/C9TA12890E10.1039/C9TA12890E ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b0749510.1021/acs.jpca.8b07495 ↗
40. Chauhan M. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2020 · 8 · 5086
41. Francis H. E. W. · 1937
42. 10.1002/adma.20160411310.1002/adma.201604113 ↗
43. Tian Y. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2015 · 6 · 3455
44. 10.1021/jz501174e10.1021/jz501174e ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0283410.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02834 ↗
46. Blencowe M. · 2013
47. 10.1126/sciadv.170073810.1126/sciadv.1700738 ↗
48. 10.1021/nl504877910.1021/nl5048779 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0757410.1021/acsnano.6b07574 ↗
50. 10.1039/C6CC10245J10.1039/C6CC10245J ↗
51. 10.1039/C9NR04104D10.1039/C9NR04104D ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.979710.1103/PhysRevB.38.9797 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0361310.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03613 ↗
54. Schötz K. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2020 · 8 · 2289
55. 10.1016/j.matt.2021.01.01910.1016/j.matt.2021.01.019 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0364710.1021/acs.jpcc.9b03647 ↗
57. 10.1002/aenm.20190365310.1002/aenm.201903653 ↗
58. 10.1002/solr.20210002910.1002/solr.202100029 ↗
59. 10.1002/smll.20160412510.1002/smll.201604125 ↗
60. 10.1038/s41467-018-04029-710.1038/s41467-018-04029-7 ↗
61. 10.1186/s40580-020-00236-510.1186/s40580-020-00236-5 ↗
62. 10.1007/s10853-016-0329-210.1007/s10853-016-0329-2 ↗