Methylammonium Lead Tribromide Single Crystal Detectors towards Robust Gamma‐Ray Photon Sensing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In recent years, hybrid perovskite single crystalline solid‐state detectors have shown promise in γ‐ray spectroscopy. Here, the γ‐ray photon induced electrical pulses are investigated, which are produced by perovskite solid‐state detectors made with the commonly used methylammonium lead tribromide crystals with chlorine incorporation. Under low electric field detector operation, slow pulses generated by γ‐rays with average rise times of 65 µs are observed, which decreases to 20 µs when a higher electrical field of 500 V cm−1 is applied. However, the baseline becomes noisy quickly, which prevents collection of clean pulses for spectra construction. Further, by systematically measuring the temperature dependence and current–voltage characteristics, such instability is attributed to the local ion migration under electrical field creating a fluctuating dark noise, which presents a major challenge in perovskite γ‐ray detector technologies. It is demonstrated that cycling the bias between positive and negative polarity can stabilize the detector, allowing for longer periods of pulse accumulation for generating energy resolved spectra with resolutions of ≈35% at 59.6 keV and ≈25% at 662 keV at room temperature. The study indicates that the main limiting factors of perovskite‐based γ‐ray detectors are slow rise times and bias instability. These challenges must be properly addressed to achieve reproducible, high‐resolution γ‐ray detection.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies (CINT) Materials Physics and Applications Division Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos NM 87545 USA
Safeguards Science and Technology (NEN‐1) Nuclear Engineering and Nonproliferation Division Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos NM 87545 USA
Physics and Chemistry of Materials Group (T‐1) Theoretical Division Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos NM 87545 USA
Funding
Los Alamos National Laboratory
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Best Research‐Cell Efficiencies https://www.nrel.gov/pv/assets/pdfs/pv‐efficiency‐chart.20181221.pdf(accessed: August2019).
2. Jena A. K. · Chem. Rev. · 2019 · 119 · 303610.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00539 ↗
3. Nie W. · Science · 2015 · 347 · 52210.1126/science.aaa0472 ↗
4. Tsai H. · Nature · 2016 · 536 · 31210.1038/nature18306 ↗
5. Tan Z.‐K. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2014 · 9 · 68710.1038/nnano.2014.149 ↗
6. Tsai H. · Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 30 · 170421710.1002/adma.201704217 ↗
7. Zhao Y. · InfoMat · 2019 · 1 · 16410.1002/inf2.12010 ↗
8. Dou L. · Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 540410.1038/ncomms6404 ↗
9. Huang C. · Laser Photonics Rev. · 2019 · 13 · 180018910.1002/lpor.201800189 ↗
10. Noh J. H. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 176410.1021/nl400349b ↗
11. Filip M. R. · Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 575710.1038/ncomms6757 ↗
12. Shi D. · Science · 2015 · 347 · 51910.1126/science.aaa2725 ↗
13. Dong Q. · Science · 2015 · 347 · 96710.1126/science.aaa5760 ↗
14. Xing G. · Science · 2013 · 342 · 34410.1126/science.1243167 ↗
15. Owens A. · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2004 · 531 · 1810.1016/j.nima.2004.05.071 ↗
16. He Y. · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 160910.1038/s41467-018-04073-3 ↗
17. Wei H. · Nat. Photonics · 2016 · 10 · 33310.1038/nphoton.2016.41 ↗
18. He Y. · ACS Photonics · 2018 · 5 · 413210.1021/acsphotonics.8b00873 ↗
19. Dang Y. · CrystEngComm · 2016 · 18 · 447610.1039/C6CE00655H ↗
20. Tisdale J. T. · CrystEngComm · 2018 · 20 · 781810.1039/C8CE01498A ↗
21. Xu Q. · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2017 · 848 · 10610.1016/j.nima.2016.12.062 ↗
22. He Y. · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2019 · 922 · 21710.1016/j.nima.2019.01.008 ↗
23. Yakunin S. · Nat. Photonics · 2015 · 9 · 44410.1038/nphoton.2015.82 ↗
24. Li L. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 752210.1021/acsami.8b18598 ↗
25. Wei H. · Nat. Mater. · 2017 · 16 · 82610.1038/nmat4927 ↗
26. Fang Y. · Nat. Photonics · 2015 · 9 · 67910.1038/nphoton.2015.156 ↗
27. Hintermayr V. A. · Adv. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 947810.1002/adma.201602897 ↗
28. Zhang C. · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 113810.1038/s41467-017-01248-2 ↗
29. Rybin N. · Chem. Mater. · 2020 · 32 · 185410.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04244 ↗
30. Lukosi E. · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2019 · 927 · 40110.1016/j.nima.2019.02.059 ↗
31. Tisdale J. T. · Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 5 · 180047610.1002/admi.201800476 ↗
32. Lee J.‐W. · APL Mater. · 2019 · 7 · 04111110.1063/1.5085643 ↗
33. De Bastiani M. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2016 · 6 · 150145310.1002/aenm.201501453 ↗
34. Domanski K. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2017 · 10 · 60410.1039/C6EE03352K ↗
35. Yakunin S. · Nat. Photonics · 2016 · 10 · 58510.1038/nphoton.2016.139 ↗
36. Medunić Z. · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2003 · 210 · 23710.1016/S0168-583X(03)01016-4 ↗
37. Chen C. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 51 · 04510510.1088/1361-6463/aaa0ed ↗
38. Wang K.‐H. · Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 1364310.1038/s41598-017-13571-1 ↗
39. Liu Y. · AIP Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 09510810.1063/1.5042489 ↗
40. Chen B. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2016 · 7 · 90510.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00215 ↗
41. Dharmadasa I. · J. Mater. Sci. · 2019 · 30 · 12851
42. Weber S. A. L. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2018 · 11 · 240410.1039/C8EE01447G ↗
43. Snaith H. J. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2014 · 5 · 151110.1021/jz500113x ↗
44. Pospisil J. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2019 · 29 · 190088110.1002/adfm.201900881 ↗
45. Nazarenko O. · NPG Asia Mater. · 2017 · 9 · e37310.1038/am.2017.45 ↗
46. Saidaminov M. I. · Nat. Commun. · 2015 · 6 · 758610.1038/ncomms8586 ↗