journal article·2017-01Open access

Ultrafast Laser‐Induced Metasurfaces for Geometric Phase Manipulation

Rokas Drevinskas, Martynas Beresna, Jingyu Zhang, Andrey G. Kazanskii, Peter G. Kazansky

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 5· Issue 1

Abstract

Direct-write femtosecond laser nanostructuring of 300 nanometer thick a-Si:H films results in space-variant functional metasurfaces with form birefringence of up to Δn ≈ –0.5. Engineering the orientation of local optical axis allows implementing continuous phase profiles of nearly any optical element including arrays of polarization microconverters and microlenses, polarization gratings, and computer-generated holograms with continuous phase gradients of ≈1 rad µm−1. The recent advances in flat optics have challenged the limitations of conventional optics by implementing ultrathin planar elements that instead of relying on optical path differences manipulate light waves via optical resonators with spatially varying phase response.1 In principle, the phase profiles of nearly any optical components including lenses, gratings, vortex phase plates, as well as elements capable of bending light in unusual ways could be designed on the basis of plasmonic metamaterials2, 3 or dielectric gradient metasurfaces,4-7 referred to as geometric phase (Pancharatnam–Berry phase8-10) optical elements (GPOEs). The main advantage of such tailored surfaces is that the large phase shifts can be realized by nanostructured thin films within thicknesses smaller than the wavelength of light, and thus can be easily integrated into multifunctional optoelectronic systems.11-13 Designs of dielectric GPOEs have attracted great interest for being a promising alternative to control light waves. The most common approach for implementing such optical elements is to exploit nanostructured materials which exhibit form birefringence.14 This means that the desired phase pattern of the wave interacting with an inhomogeneous birefringent element is directly encoded in the optical axis orientation and is equal to twice the rotation angle of the locally imprinted wave plate. Although numerous lithography techniques enabling the manufacturing of high efficiency and low scattering optical elements with complex phase gradients have been reported,15-17 the technological flexibility remains a problem; it is still dictated by the material properties, and/or requires a long time to process. Here we propose a direct-write ultrafast laser nanostructuring as an alternative method capable of fabricating GPOEs in various media. One of the most fascinating aspects of this technique is the ability to induce tunable structures6 with subwavelength periodicities that originate from birefringence.18 The key advantage of using femtosecond pulses for direct laser writing, as opposed to longer pulses, is that they can rapidly deposit energy in solids with high precision. The light is absorbed and the optical excitation ends before the surrounding lattice is perturbed, which results in highly localized nanostructuring without collateral material damage.19, 20 First observation of laser-induced periodic surface structures dates back to the 1960s, when Birnbaum reported ripple formation on the surface of semiconductors.21 Since then, this phenomenon was observed on virtually any type of media including metal, semiconductor, dielectric solids, and thin films.22-29 Processing conditions occurred to be broad with wavelengths ranging from the mid-infrared to visible spectrum and from continuous wave operation to femtosecond laser systems. A vast number of applications, including coloration,30 control of surface chemical and mechanical properties,31, 32 have been proposed. More than a decade ago, Bricchi and Kazansky demonstrated that femtosecond laser pulses focused inside silica glass can lead to self-assembled nanogratings, which exhibit birefringence comparable to quartz crystals.33 Later, the tailored surface nanogratings were introduced showing the threefold birefringence increase.34 Thus, a functional birefringent layer should be at least several tens of micrometers thick. For most applications such a thickness is appropriate. However, this limits the design and integration of miniaturized elements. To realize the laser-induced nanogratings as functional metasurfaces, the intermediate case between volume and surface periodic structuring has to be implemented when the modification of high-index thin films along its depth would significantly enhance the resulting anisotropy. Here we demonstrate that the interaction of femtosecond laser pulses with hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) thin films induces self-assembled periodic lamellae structures oriented perpendicular to the incident beam polarization. These films with the induced subwavelength modulation of refractive index behave as a uniaxial birefringent material with the slow axis oriented parallel to the imprinted nanogratings. Thus, the form birefringence of two orders of magnitude higher than in silica glass can be achieved.18, 33-35 As a result, large retardation is realized within hundreds of times thinner layers (Figure 1a) that can be deposited on various substrates with different textures. We leverage the realization of laser-induced periodic thin-film structures as a highly birefringent metasurface to design controllable and high precision GPOEs. Here we report on demonstration of various geometric phase designs including arrays of polarization microconverters and microlenses, polarization gratings (PGs) and computer-generated holograms with phase gradients reaching up to ≈1 rad µm−1. In order to identify the maximum birefringence of the laser-induced periodic thin-film structures, 80 µm long lines separated by an interline distance of 30 µm were imprinted under different writing conditions. First, the pulse density was varied from 1.25 × 105 to 5 × 106 pulses mm−1 with various writing speeds to ensure the constant laser repetition rate of 100 kHz. Second, the writing speed was varied from 0.05 to 0.4 mm s−1 with various laser repetition rates to ensure a constant pulse density of 5 × 105 pulses mm−1. From here, the resulting retardance as a function of pulse energy varying from 0.005 to 0.2 µJ was obtained (Figure 1b). At the pulse energies slightly above the ablation threshold (>0.05 µJ), the film is modified along its depth organizing into periodic structure that is qualitatively dependent on the pulse density (Figure 1b, top graph), while the significant dependence on the laser repetition rate or writing speed is not observed (Figure 1b, bottom graph). At pulse densities higher than 105 pulses mm−1, we detect the formation of birefringent subwavelength periodicity nanogratings oriented perpendicular to the laser beam polarization. The maximum retardation of R546 nm ≈ 0.55π is achieved at 5 × 105 pulses mm−1 with the related writing speed of 0.2 mm s−1 and repetition rate of 100 kHz. The retardance drops drastically with the further density increase (>106 pulses mm−1), as the nanogratings are replaced by nonbirefringent wavelength-size ripples oriented parallel to the laser beam polarization. Optical performance of the fabricated wave plates is strongly dependent on the linear absorption and scattering of the nanostructured material, which can be significantly improved by reducing the intrinsic losses. This can be achieved by increasing the laser pulse energy as it triggers the oxidation processes and ultimately enhances the transmission reaching a threefold value at the pulse energy of 0.2 µJ, while the birefringence remains of the same order (Figure 1c). Alternatively, this problem could be partially overcome by achieving highly regular nanostructures with a reduced scattering, and/or by implementing other high-index materials with a transparency window in the visible spectrum. Thus, the realization of nanostructuring in lossless materials could challenge not only the nanolithography techniques that are strictly limited to the fabrication of silicon-based or plasmonic metasurfaces but also the conventional optics. The dispersion analysis performed in the spectral region from 450 to 680 nm revealed a chromatic behavior of the wave plates. In the case of pulse energy of 0.125 µJ and interline distance of 3 µm the retardation value varies from 0.29π to 0.47π (Figure 1d). Less than 5% variation in retardance is observed in the spectral region from 532 to 546 nm wavelength. The transmission coefficient at 532 nm, where the phase retardation is about 0.45π, is roughly of ≈0.1. The transmission as high as 50% can be achieved at longer wavelengths (≈700 nm) where the lower scattering is ensured, as well as the amorphous silicon band gap is approached (≈1.7 eV37). Although the losses are high compared to other nanolithography techniques,15, 16 the performance is sufficient for the majority of applications such as polarization sensitive beam shaping, information and imaging technologies, quantum optics. The Pancharatnam–Berry phase is a geometric phase achieved by space-variant polarization manipulations.14 In the next step, we designed GPOEs by controlling the azimuth of the slow axis, A(x, y), of locally imprinted nanogratings. As a result, the circularly polarized light transmitted through the GPOEs experiences the relative phase change equal to φ(x, y) = ±2A(x, y), where the sign is defined by the handedness of the input polarization. All GPOEs demonstrated in this work were imprinted using the pulse energy of 0.125 µJ and pulse density of 5 × 105 pulses mm−1 with corresponding 0.2 mm s−1 writing speed and 100 kHz repetition rate. The interline distance was ranged from 3 to 4 µm to balance the homogeneity and magnitude of the laser-induced retardation. In particular, when designing GPOEs by laser direct writing, it is important to ensure the continuity of the generated nanogratings. If the phase gradient is introduced, the local field as well as the induced structures is perturbed by the previously imprinted structure. Thus, the induced retardance value drops with the decrease of the grating period (a) (Figure 2a). The flexibility of the direct-write femtosecond laser nanostructuring technique allows recording of nearly any wavefront as a GPOE. The phase profile of an incident plane wave can be manipulated radially, azimuthally or both simultaneously resulting in complex designs. Here, we demonstrate GPOEs with azimuthal phase variation serving as polarization and phase converters that generate optical vortices with radial and azimuthal polarizations. Initial experiments were carried out with a radially symmetric 1 mm diameter GPOE (Figure 3a–d). The topological charge of the element was set to c = –1, indicating that the resulting orbital angular momentum has opposite sign compared to the input spin momentum.39 The average value of the induced retardance was ≈0.5π at 532 nm wavelength, which corresponds to the quarter-wave plate value. The generated radially (azimuthally) polarized vortex with the orbital angular momentum l = –1 (l = 1) is considered as a superposition of two circularly polarized beams, one possessing the orbital angular momentum l = –2 (l = 2) and the other having a plane front.40 The circularly polarized vortex with topological charge 2 can be separated by filtering with a quarter-wave plate and linear polarizer. To verify the radial/azimuthal polarization optical vortex, the converter was inserted into the path of a left/right handed circularly polarized frequency-doubled neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) cw laser beam. For comparison the optical test system was modeled using the algorithm based on Jones matrix formalism and Fourier propagation.40 The propeller-shaped interference pattern, which is typical for double charged vortex beams, obtained after filtering with a linear polarizer confirms successful realization of the imprinted radially symmetric GPOE (Figure 3e–j). In the next step, we imprinted a 2 mm × 2 mm array of 100 micrometer diameter converters (Figure 4). Same as in Figure 3, an intricate swirling interference pattern was observed in the far-field indicating the presence of the orbital angular momentum with l = ±2, where the handedness of the input circular polarization defines both the orientation of the generated whirlpool beams and the resulting polarization state (Figure 4b,c). This shows that the technique enables imprinting of elements with high resolution and can be exploited to develop miniaturized optics for optical manipulation of microobjects on lab-on-a-chip platform,41 or directly imprint wave-plate arrays for polarization sensitive detectors.42 The final example of GPOE showing the simultaneous radial and azimuthal phase manipulation is a computer-generated geometric phase Fourier hologram (CGH) that converts the initial Gaussian beam into the target intensity distribution. Using the adapted weighted Gerchberg–Saxton algorithm,44 the eight-bit grayscale CGH element with 0.1 megapixel and pixel spacing of 3 µm was designed to encode the “Light” logo (Figure 6). During the continuous writing process, the maximum relative continuous phase change of π between the two adjacent pixels was achieved. By using the Fourier transforming properties of a positive lens, the target image was reconstructed within the spectral range of 450–950 nm (Figure 6c–h). As it was mentioned before (Equation 3), to attain the high efficiency of an imprinted GPOE, the half-wave retardation must be ensured. However, even if the retardance is below this value, the nondiffracted beam can be completely removed by the means of polarization filtering (Figure 6a). In addition, the geometric phase is independent of wavelength. Therefore, the phase profile for different wavelengths transmitted through the same GPOE will be the same. In this case, the broadband sources can be implemented with a filtering efficiency, η = I1st/(I1st + I0th), as high as ≈100% (Figure 6d–h). It also should be mentioned that the same accumulated phase due to the different wave vectors causes each wavelength to diffract at different angles. In summary, we have demonstrated potential implementations of laser-induced periodic thin-film structures as the geometric phase manipulating elements including polarization gratings, Fourier holograms, microlenses, and optical vortex microconverters. The direct-write ultrafast laser nanostructuring is a high precision, flexible, and time efficient technique. Through nonlinear light–matter interaction, the subwavelength resolution is ensured providing the possibility of reaching phase gradients higher than 1 rad µm−1. As a result, the applicability to any material that supports laser-induced periodic structures including high-index semiconductors and lossless dielectrics deposited on any substrate with different textures could revolutionize the fields of integrated flat optics and provide new methods of manufacturing. The overall fabrication process of the millimeter-sized elements being on the time scale of minutes could facilitate innovative solutions in fields such as security marking, data storage, solar cells, sensors, and detectors. The experiments were carried out with the 300 nm thick a-Si:H films deposited on a silica glass substrate by the plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition upon the decomposition of the mixture of silane (SiH4) and argon (Ar) at substrate temperature of 250 °C. The ratio between the gases in the reaction chamber was 25% SiH4 and 75% Ar. The film was processed with the mode-locked ytterbium-doped potassium gadolinium tungstate (Yb:KGW) ultrafast laser system (Pharos, Light Conversion Ltd.) operating at a wavelength of 1030 nm with the pulse duration fixed at 360 fs. The laser beam was focused to a 4 µm spot on the film via a 0.13 numerical aperture (NA) objective lens. Surface imaging of laser-induced periodic thin-film structures was performed with a scanning electron microscope Zeiss Evo50 and optical transmission microscope Olympus BX51. The imprinted elements were optically characterized and/or visualized with the VIS/NIR microspectrometer (CRAIC Technologies, Olympus BX51) and the quantitative birefringence measurement system (CRi Abrio, Olympus BX51) operating at 546 nm wavelength. Nd:YAG cw laser (Spectra-Physics) frequency-doubled to 532 nm and supercontinuum fiber laser (Fianium) emitting a broad optical spectrum in the range of 450–950 nm were used to characterize the Gaussian beam propagation through the imprinted GPOEs. The authors thank C. Pannell and A. Patel for valuable discussions. The study was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (grant EP/M029042/1), and the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia (grant no. 14.Z50.31.0009). The data for this work is accessible through the University of Southampton Institutional Research Repository (dx.doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/389785).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Photonic Crystals and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Optoelectronics Research Centre University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ UK

Physics Department M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University Moscow 119991 Russia

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat383910.1038/nmat3839 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.121468610.1126/science.1214686 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.121071310.1126/science.1210713 ↗
4. 10.1364/OL.27.00114110.1364/OL.27.001141 ↗
5. 10.1364/OE.22.01269110.1364/OE.22.012691 ↗
6. 10.1364/OME.1.00078310.1364/OME.1.000783 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.125321310.1126/science.1253213 ↗
8. 10.1007/BF0304605010.1007/BF03046050 ↗
9. 10.1098/rspa.1984.002310.1098/rspa.1984.0023 ↗
10. 10.1038/360307a010.1038/360307a0 ↗
11. 10.1109/JPROC.2009.201721810.1109/JPROC.2009.2017218 ↗
12. 10.1364/AO.50.00228310.1364/AO.50.002283 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.488241810.1063/1.4882418 ↗
14. 10.1364/OL.26.00142410.1364/OL.26.001424 ↗
15. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.24710.1038/nphoton.2014.247 ↗
16. 10.1038/nnano.2015.210.1038/nnano.2015.2 ↗
17. 10.1364/OPTICA.2.00095810.1364/OPTICA.2.000958 ↗
18. Yariv A. · 1984
19. 10.1038/nmat76710.1038/nmat767 ↗
20. 10.1038/nphoton.2008.4710.1038/nphoton.2008.47 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.170307110.1063/1.1703071 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.165476110.1063/1.1654761 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.26.536610.1103/PhysRevB.26.5366 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.195510.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1955 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.27.781710.1103/PhysRevB.27.7817 ↗
26. 10.2351/1.471265810.2351/1.4712658 ↗
27. 10.1088/1464-4258/9/6/S1110.1088/1464-4258/9/6/S11 ↗
28. 10.1364/OE.16.01626510.1364/OE.16.016265 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.23541310.1103/PhysRevB.83.235413 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.283490210.1063/1.2834902 ↗
31. 10.1021/la053374k10.1021/la053374k ↗
32. 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.09910.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.099 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.218558710.1063/1.2185587 ↗
34. 10.1364/OE.23.00142810.1364/OE.23.001428 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.491953810.1063/1.4919538 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.11521110.1063/1.115211 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0927-0248(02)00448-810.1016/S0927-0248(02)00448-8 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0030-4018(02)01598-510.1016/S0030-4018(02)01598-5 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.488241810.1063/1.4882418 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.359071610.1063/1.3590716 ↗
41. 10.1364/OPEX.12.00114410.1364/OPEX.12.001144 ↗
42. 10.1364/OL.38.00409610.1364/OL.38.004096 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.153930010.1063/1.1539300 ↗
44. 10.1364/OE.15.00191310.1364/OE.15.001913 ↗