Efficient Exciton–Plasmon Conversion in Ag Nanowire/Monolayer MoS2 Hybrids: Direct Imaging and Quantitative Estimation of Plasmon Coupling and Propagation
Source abstract
Abstract
Plasmon coupling and propagation between metallic nanowires (NWs) and atomically thin transition-metal dichalcogenide semiconductors are demonstrated using Ag NW/MoS2 hybrids. The high exciton–plasmon coupling efficiency with large throughput of MoS2 excitons allows quantitative assessment of plasmon waveguide performance. Monolayer MoS2 allows real-space visualization of the propagating plasmons along the NW via direct plasmon–exciton coupling. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Perovskite Materials and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Integrated Nanostructure Physics (CINAP) Institute for Basic Science (IBS) Sungkyunkwan University Suwon 440‐746 Korea
Department of Energy Science Sungkyunkwan University Suwon 440‐746 Korea
Department of Physics Sungkyunkwan University Suwon 440‐746 Korea
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.210.1038/nphoton.2014.2 ↗
2. 10.1038/nature0623010.1038/nature06230 ↗
3. 10.1002/lpor.20120007610.1002/lpor.201200076 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.13680210.1103/PhysRevLett.99.136802 ↗
5. 10.1002/lpor.20120006710.1002/lpor.201200067 ↗
6. 10.1038/nmat350510.1038/nmat3505 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.486274510.1063/1.4862745 ↗
8. Mak K. F. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105
9. 10.1038/nnano.2014.15010.1038/nnano.2014.150 ↗
10. 10.1038/nnano.2014.22210.1038/nnano.2014.222 ↗
11. Gruber C. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100
12. 10.1364/OE.21.00788210.1364/OE.21.007882 ↗
13. 10.1021/nl202825s10.1021/nl202825s ↗
14. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.11210.1038/nphoton.2012.112 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.123554710.1126/science.1235547 ↗
16. 10.1021/nn403159y10.1021/nn403159y ↗
17. 10.1364/OPTICA.1.00014910.1364/OPTICA.1.000149 ↗
18. 10.1038/nnano.2013.20710.1038/nnano.2013.207 ↗
19. 10.1021/nl903868w10.1021/nl903868w ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.25740310.1103/PhysRevLett.95.257403 ↗
21. 10.1038/ncomms712810.1038/ncomms7128 ↗
22. 10.1021/nn504196n10.1021/nn504196n ↗