Spectroscopic Analysis for the Identification of Loss Mechanisms in Back‐Contact Perovskite Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Back‐contact perovskite solar cells offer a significant potential to reach high efficiency due to reduced parasitic absorption from the top surface. However, the currently reported efficiencies are considerably lower (<10%) than planar perovskite solar cells (>20%). Herein, back‐contact perovskite solar cells are fabricated to study loss mechanisms that cause low device efficiency. This work spatially resolves the short‐circuit current, open‐circuit voltage, photoluminescence quantum yield, carrier lifetime, and external quantum efficiency of the devices. The results indicate that the front surface recombination, increased nonradiative recombination at hole contact layer/perovskite interface, and the extraction barriers are three main mechanisms limiting devices from achieving high efficiencies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
AMOLF Institute Science Park 104 Amsterdam 1098XG The Netherlands
TNO Energy Transition Westerduinweg 3 Petten 1755LE Netherlands
Institute of Physics University of Amsterdam Science Park 904 Amsterdam 1098XH The Netherlands
Molecular Materials and Nanosystems and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems Eindhoven University of Technology 5600 MB Eindhoven Eindhoven The Netherlands
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.06.02410.1016/j.solmat.2017.06.024 ↗
2. NREL. Best Research Cell Efficiency Chart.https://www.nrel.gov/pv/moduleefficiency.html(accessed: October 2022).
3. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.227035110.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2270351 ↗
4. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.235215110.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2352151 ↗
5. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.3210.1038/nenergy.2017.32 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11153410.1016/j.solmat.2021.111534 ↗
7. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.295764210.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2957642 ↗
8. 10.1063/5.003309410.1063/5.0033094 ↗
9. Gottschalg R. · 2000 · 124
10. N.Romeo A.Bosio S.Mazzamuto D.Menossi J. L.Peña A.Salavei I.Rimmaudo V.Allodi A.Romeo in 26th EU PVSEC2011 pp.2460–2462 https://doi.org/10.4229/26thEUPVSEC2011-3DO.9.4.
11. 10.1002/ese3.84310.1002/ese3.843 ↗
12. 10.1063/5.000992410.1063/5.0009924 ↗
13. 10.1021/am503769a10.1021/am503769a ↗
14. 10.1039/C6TC00681G10.1039/C6TC00681G ↗
15. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.03.01010.1016/j.joule.2019.03.010 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.00610.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.006 ↗
17. 10.1039/C8EE03517B10.1039/C8EE03517B ↗
18. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0129810.1021/acsaem.2c01298 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.10036310.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100363 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.197897910.1063/1.1978979 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.274920110.1063/1.2749201 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0046610.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00466 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.124398210.1126/science.1243982 ↗
24. 10.1038/ncomms446110.1038/ncomms4461 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0130810.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01308 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0109210.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01092 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0653410.1021/acsnano.6b06534 ↗
28. 10.1038/nnano.2016.16210.1038/nnano.2016.162 ↗
29. 10.1364/OE.38403910.1364/OE.384039 ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20210005310.1002/aenm.202100053 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41586-021-03285-w10.1038/s41586-021-03285-w ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13144410.1016/j.cej.2021.131444 ↗
33. 10.1039/C5EE03874J10.1039/C5EE03874J ↗
34. 10.1002/adfm.20200155910.1002/adfm.202001559 ↗
35. Hirvonen L. · Front. Phys. · 2020 · 5 · 8
36. Green M. · Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. · 2012 · 6 · 20
37. 10.1038/nnano.2016.16210.1038/nnano.2016.162 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.08530310.1103/PhysRevB.76.085303 ↗
39. 10.1002/aenm.20210356710.1002/aenm.202103567 ↗
40. 10.1038/nature2598910.1038/nature25989 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0084810.1021/acs.chemmater.1c00848 ↗
42. 10.1002/aenm.20200348910.1002/aenm.202003489 ↗