Outdoor Stability of 518 cm 2 Active Area Screen‐Printed Mesoscopic Carbon‐Based Perovskite Solar Modules Over 12 Months
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Mesoscopic carbon‐based perovskite solar cells (C‐PSCs) composed of screen‐printed TiO 2 , ZrO 2 , and carbon layers offer a pathway to stable, scalable, low‐cost photovoltaics via commercially mature fabrication methods. While their potential lifespan has been demonstrated under standardized conditions, few studies examine the behavior of large‐area modules exposed to real‐world environments. Here, 12 months of outdoor weathering data are presented for 518 cm 2 active area MAPbI 3 modules with over 80% geometric fill factor, fabricated using low‐cost mechanical scribing. Modules exhibited power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) up to 9.4% under 1 sun, with PCE increasing at lower light intensities. Following outdoor continuous intermittent power point tracking for over 12 months, an encapsulated module retained 68% of its initial PCE. Performance remained stable during cooler months, only falling when temperatures rose during summer months. Similar temperature‐dependent trends are observed in repeated trials. Weathering trials identified key degradation pathways linked to fabrication—namely, non‐uniform heating during perovskite annealing, encapsulation, and infiltration‐related failures. Controlling heat exposure and conformity during module manufacture and operation is therefore critical to extending lifetime. These results highlight the importance of real‐condition assessments in optimizing the scale‐up of novel perovskite technologies, providing key insights into the steps required to achieve commercially viable lifetimes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
SPECIFIC Faculty of Science and Engineering Swansea University Bay Campus, Crymlyn Burrows Swansea SA1 8EN UK
Funding
Royal Society · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/accountsmr.3c0006810.1021/accountsmr.3c00068 ↗
2. NREL.Interactive Best Research‐Cell Efficiency Chart | Photovoltaic Research | NREL 2025 https://www.nrel.gov/pv/interactive‐cell‐efficiency.
3. Wu T. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2024 · 14 · 1
4. 10.1126/science.adk908910.1126/science.adk9089 ↗
5. 10.3390/en1402038610.3390/en14020386 ↗
6. 10.1017/S143192762200168410.1017/S1431927622001684 ↗
7. 10.3390/ma1611391710.3390/ma16113917 ↗
8. 10.1039/C7TA05674E10.1039/C7TA05674E ↗
9. 10.1002/ente.20180090510.1002/ente.201800905 ↗
10. 10.1021/nl202311v10.1021/nl202311v ↗
11. 10.1081/AL-12002362710.1081/AL-120023627 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.03.00110.1016/j.jmapro.2016.03.001 ↗
13. 10.1002/admt.20180015610.1002/admt.201800156 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.01510.1016/j.joule.2019.08.015 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.aat823510.1126/science.aat8235 ↗
16. Qi J. · Adv. Mater. · 2025 · 2506114 · 1
17. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0221310.1021/acsaem.0c02213 ↗
18. Bashir A. · Sol Energy · 2018 · 182 · 22510.1016/j.solener.2019.02.056 ↗
19. 10.3390/en1307158910.3390/en13071589 ↗
20. 10.1039/D4MA00136B10.1039/D4MA00136B ↗
21. jane P. S. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2024 · 3410.1002/adfm.202401959 ↗
22. 10.1038/ncomms1568410.1038/ncomms15684 ↗
23. Cheacharoen R. · Sustain Energy Fuels [Internet] · 2018 · 2 · 239810.1039/C8SE00250A ↗
24. 10.1039/C7EE02564E10.1039/C7EE02564E ↗
25. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.910.1038/nenergy.2017.9 ↗
26. Chakar J. · Sol. RRL · 2024 · 2400093 · 1
27. 10.1002/ente.20150004510.1002/ente.201500045 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.2c0246310.1021/acsami.2c02463 ↗
29. 10.1080/14686996.2017.140677710.1080/14686996.2017.1406777 ↗
30. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.273222310.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2732223 ↗
31. Mouhamad Y. · Sol Energy [Internet] · 2019 · 187 · 12910.1016/j.solener.2019.05.047 ↗
32. Shi L. · Science · 2020 · 368 · 1328
33. 10.1039/C6EE02016J10.1039/C6EE02016J ↗
34. Xiao Y. · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 1 · 5453
35. Hashmi S. G. · Adv. Mater. Technol. · 2017 · 2 · 410.1002/admt.201600183 ↗
36. 10.1002/adfm.20190088510.1002/adfm.201900885 ↗
37. Worsley C. A. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2024 · 12 · 9401
38. Ling C. · Small Methods · 2022 · 6 · 1
39. Li J. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2025 · 1510.1002/aenm.202403844 ↗
40. Gupta R. K. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2024 · 1510.1002/aenm.202403844 ↗
41. 10.1039/D0TC03390A10.1039/D0TC03390A ↗
42. Cheng Y. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2024 · 14 · 1
43. Cheng Y. · Adv. Mater. · 2025 · 37 · 1
44. 10.1038/s41560-019-0529-510.1038/s41560-019-0529-5 ↗
45. Tsuji R. · Materials (Basel) · 2024 · 17 · 010.3390/ma17123002 ↗
46. 10.3390/coatings1010100810.3390/coatings10101008 ↗
47. Potts S. J. · J Coatings Technol Res · 2020 · 17 · 44710.1007/s11998-019-00291-6 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsaem.3c0305610.1021/acsaem.3c03056 ↗