Cycling‐Induced Degradation of Organic–Inorganic Perovskite‐Based Resistive Switching Memory
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract As one key issue of resistive switching (RS) memory, the cycling endurance is poorly understood in hybrid perovskite‐based memory devices. Here, the cycling failure and the corresponding cycling‐induced degradation of CH3NH3PbI3‐based resistive random access memory devices are discussed. The high resistance state clearly decreases with the number of operation cycles, finally triggering irreversible failure in the collapse of switching window. By monitoring the I–V curves for all cycles, a negative set event is observed to be the critical turning point that considerably accelerates the cycling degradation rate. The decrease of |Vset| and |Vreset| indicates a reduction of the migration barrier of iodine vacancies (VI), which accounts for the appearance of a negative set after cycling. The understanding of RS cycling degradation can promote the optimization of device endurance by slowing the defect accumulation rate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Perovskite Materials and Applications · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Advanced Optoelectronic Functional Materials Research Key Laboratory for UV Light‐Emitting Materials and Technology (Northeast Normal University) Ministry of Education 5268 Renmin Street Changchun 130000 China
Department of Architectural Engineering Qingdao Huanghai University 1145 Linghai Road, The West Coast New Area Qingdao 266427 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · People's Government of Jilin Province
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mser.2014.06.00210.1016/j.mser.2014.06.002 ↗
2. 10.1109/JPROC.2017.268483010.1109/JPROC.2017.2684830 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.500257110.1063/1.5002571 ↗
4. 10.1109/JPROC.2012.219036910.1109/JPROC.2012.2190369 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.359955910.1063/1.3599559 ↗
6. 10.1002/admi.20160103510.1002/admi.201601035 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.480209210.1063/1.4802092 ↗
8. 10.1002/smll.20170093310.1002/smll.201700933 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20150259210.1002/adfm.201502592 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20160082010.1002/adma.201600820 ↗
11. 10.1039/C6TC02503J10.1039/C6TC02503J ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20160085910.1002/adma.201600859 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0164310.1021/acsnano.6b01643 ↗
14. 10.1002/aelm.20160010010.1002/aelm.201600100 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20170052710.1002/adma.201700527 ↗
16. 10.1109/TED.2015.246310410.1109/TED.2015.2463104 ↗
17. 10.1109/LED.2009.201568710.1109/LED.2009.2015687 ↗
18. 10.1109/LED.2016.260888710.1109/LED.2016.2608887 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.500333110.1063/1.5003331 ↗
20. Huang P. · 2013 · 22.5.1
21. 10.1109/TED.2012.221860710.1109/TED.2012.2218607 ↗
22. Balatti S. · 2014 · 14.3.1
23. 10.1002/adts.20170003510.1002/adts.201700035 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41598-017-00778-510.1038/s41598-017-00778-5 ↗
25. 10.1109/TED.2016.260437010.1109/TED.2016.2604370 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.7b0819710.1021/acsami.7b08197 ↗
27. 10.1039/C7TC00712D10.1039/C7TC00712D ↗
28. 10.1109/LED.2018.280978410.1109/LED.2018.2809784 ↗
29. Balatti S. · Proc. IEEE Int. Rel. Phys. Symp. (IRPS) · 2015 · 5B.3.1
30. 10.1002/978352769977310.1002/9783527699773 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10832-017-0082-110.1007/s10832-017-0082-1 ↗
32. 10.3390/ma703215510.3390/ma7032155 ↗
33. 10.1002/smll.20160008810.1002/smll.201600088 ↗
34. 10.1109/TED.2011.216751310.1109/TED.2011.2167513 ↗
35. 10.1021/cm502468k10.1021/cm502468k ↗
36. Wang Z.‐Q. · 2015 · 173
37. 10.1109/LED.2015.239430210.1109/LED.2015.2394302 ↗
38. 10.1088/0268-1242/31/6/06300210.1088/0268-1242/31/6/063002 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.369769010.1063/1.3697690 ↗
40. 10.1039/c000259c10.1039/c000259c ↗