journal article·2025-05Open access

Mechanical Deformation Effects on Flexible Thin Film Transistors: A Comparison Between 6,13‐Bis(Triisopropylsilylethynyl)Pentacene and N,N′‐Bis‐(2‐Ethylhexyl)‐1,7‐Dicyanoperylene‐3,4:9,10‐bis(Dicarboximide) Derivatives

A. Mascia, M. Concas, E. Podda, G. Casula, S. Lai, P. Cosseddu

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 9

Abstract

Abstract In this work, the investigation of the surface strain‐induced electrical changes in two commonly employed solution‐processable organic semiconductors, i.e., 6,13‐bis(triisopropylsilylethynyl)pentacene (TIPS‐Pentacene) and N,N′‐bis‐(2‐ethylhexyl)−1,7‐dicyanoperylene‐3,4:9,10‐bis(dicarboximide) (N1400), is reported. A detailed electromechanical characterization of two sets of flexible organic field‐effect transistors is performed, clearly demonstrating that both systems are affected by mechanical deformation in terms of electrical performance. However, the N1400 system shows a much more stable and reproducible response, even after continuous mechanical stress. XRD and AFM analysis demonstrate that such difference is mainly related to the changes induced on the two thin film morphology by the applied deformations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering University of Cagliari via Marengo 3 Cagliari 09123 Italy

Centre for Research University Services – CeSAR University of Cagliari Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato Monserrato (Cagliari) 09042 Italy

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20190149310.1002/adma.201901493 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41528-022-00133-310.1038/s41528-022-00133-3 ↗
3. 10.1557/s43577-023-00593-610.1557/s43577-023-00593-6 ↗
4. 10.1002/admt.20220089110.1002/admt.202200891 ↗
5. 10.1088/2399-1984/ad36ff10.1088/2399-1984/ad36ff ↗
6. 10.1002/pol.2021045710.1002/pol.20210457 ↗
7. 10.1002/smm2.126110.1002/smm2.1261 ↗
8. 10.1002/smll.20230240610.1002/smll.202302406 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41528-022-00149-910.1038/s41528-022-00149-9 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20230895210.1002/adma.202308952 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41598-023-43360-y10.1038/s41598-023-43360-y ↗
12. 10.1002/admt.20240053410.1002/admt.202400534 ↗
13. 10.1002/smtd.20210067610.1002/smtd.202100676 ↗
14. 10.1002/admi.20220020610.1002/admi.202200206 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.3c0221610.1021/acsami.3c02216 ↗
16. 10.1109/LED.2023.331426810.1109/LED.2023.3314268 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsapm.4c0009210.1021/acsapm.4c00092 ↗
18. 10.1143/JJAP.44.284110.1143/JJAP.44.2841 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.186886810.1063/1.1868868 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.02.03010.1016/j.orgel.2013.02.030 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.10.03310.1016/j.orgel.2012.10.033 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20150419610.1002/adma.201504196 ↗
23. 10.1109/LED.2011.217389810.1109/LED.2011.2173898 ↗
24. 10.1038/srep0204810.1038/srep02048 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.06.00810.1016/j.orgel.2018.06.008 ↗
26. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.290917410.1109/JSEN.2019.2909174 ↗
27. 10.1038/srep3820310.1038/srep38203 ↗
28. 10.1002/aelm.20170027110.1002/aelm.201700271 ↗
29. 10.1002/adfm.20140078910.1002/adfm.201400789 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.5b0117210.1021/acsami.5b01172 ↗
31. 10.1021/ja016245910.1021/ja0162459 ↗