Mineral Interface Doping: Hydroxyapatite Deposited on Silicon to Trigger the Electronic Properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Doping silicon wafers without using highly toxic or corrosive chemical substances has become a critical issue for semiconductor device manufacturing. In this work, ultra‐thin films of hydroxyapatite (Ca5(PO4)3OH) are prepared by tethering by aggregation and growth (T‐BAG), and further processed by spike annealing. Via in situ infrared (IR), the decomposition of hydroxyapatite and intermixing with the native silicon oxide is observed already at temperatures as low as 200 °C. Phosphate transport through the native silicon oxide is driven by a phase transformation into a more stable thermal oxide. At 700 °C, diffusion of phosphorus into the sub‐surface region of oxide‐free silicon is observed. In situ IR combined with electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF‐SIMS), and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements allows to conclude that the phosphorus is: i) transported through the silicon oxide barrier, ii)) diffused inside the oxide‐free silicon, and iii) finally modified the electrical activity of the silicon wafer. To further explain the experimental findings, density‐functional theory (DFT) is used to demonstrate the extent of the effect of phosphorus doping on the electronic nature of silicon surfaces, showing that even small amounts of doping can have a measurable effect on the electrical performance of semiconductor wafers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) Institute of Concrete Structures and Building Materials 76131 Karlsruhe Germany
Tokyo Electron America, Inc. Austin Texas 78741 United States
Funding
National Science Foundation
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nn304199w10.1021/nn304199w ↗
2. 10.1021/nn502855k10.1021/nn502855k ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat205810.1038/nmat2058 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl803252610.1021/nl8032526 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20120280810.1002/adfm.201202808 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.180115510.1063/1.1801155 ↗
7. 10.1038/ncomms634610.1038/ncomms6346 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0927-796X(98)00013-810.1016/S0927-796X(98)00013-8 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.480975510.1063/1.4809755 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.186445210.1149/1.1864452 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.6b1327610.1021/acsami.6b13276 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0232710.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02327 ↗
13. J.Schmitz M.vanGestel P.Stolk Y.Ponomarev F.Roozeboom J.Van Berkum P.Zalm P.Woerlee InUltra‐shallow junction formation by outdiffusion from implanted oxide San Francisco CA USA December 1998.
14. P. A.Stolk J.Schmitz F. N.Cubaynes A. C. M. C. v.Brandenburg J. G. M. v.Berkum W. G. v. d.Wijgert F.Roozeboom InThe Effect of Thin Oxide Layers on Shallow Junction Formation September 1999.
15. 10.1021/la300709n10.1021/la300709n ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0498610.1021/acs.jpcc.6b04986 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b0009110.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00091 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
23. 10.1149/2.0151411jes10.1149/2.0151411jes ↗
24. 10.1002/cber.1997130091110.1002/cber.19971300911 ↗
25. 10.1134/S102745101112006810.1134/S1027451011120068 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0439410.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04394 ↗
27. 10.1021/la904597c10.1021/la904597c ↗
28. 10.1063/1.486117710.1063/1.4861177 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp500170t10.1021/jp500170t ↗
30. 10.1021/am508313g10.1021/am508313g ↗
31. 10.1002/admi.20150042110.1002/admi.201500421 ↗
32. 10.1021/jz401909510.1021/jz4019095 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0545910.1021/acsnano.7b05459 ↗