journal article·2025-10Open access

Biocompatibility and Long‐Term Stability of DNA‐Based Organic Mixed Conductors for Bioelectronics

Sarka Hradilova, Katharina Matura, Munise Cobet, Ariana Opletalova, Yolanda Salinas, Niyazi Serdar Sariciftci, Serpil Tekoglu, Katerina Polakova

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 20

Abstract

Abstract In the field of bioelectronics, designing novel organic mixed ionic‐electronic conductors (OMIECs) is crucial to overcome the limitations in terms of biocompatibility and long‐term stability. Polymeric OMIECs are reported for their potential applications in implantable devices to record and stimulate biological signals. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) templated PEDOT and polypyrrole are synthesized via oxidative chemical polymerization. The biocompatibility and long‐term chemical stability of conductive composites PEDOT:DNA and PPy:DNA are evaluated and compared to PEDOT:PSS. To examine in vitro cytotoxicity, NIH 3T3 cells are cultured on thin‐films of PEDOT:PSS and DNA‐based biocomposites. The visual determination of cell morphology and adhesion are carried out by fluorescent optical microscopy and atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging. The acute and long‐term cell viability is performed by using flow cytometry. After 96 h of incubation, the cells maintain over 80% viability, retaining their morphology and adhesion properties similar to control cells on plastic or glass samples. This indicates that all tested samples demonstrate high biocompatibility. The material stability of PEDOT:DNA and PPy:DNA is investigated by integrating the materials into organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs). The results confirm an efficient ion‐to‐electron transduction in OECTs and long‐term chemical stability after storing the materials for up to 5 years.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Czech Advanced Technology and Research Institute (CATRIN) Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials (RCPTM) Palacký University Olomouc Šlechtitelů 27 Olomouc 779 00 Czech Republic

Linz Institute for Solar Cells (LIOS) and Institute of Physical Chemistry Johannes Kepler University Linz Altenbergerstrasse 69 Linz A‐4040 Austria

Institute of Polymer Chemistry Johannes Kepler University Linz Altenbergerstrasse 69 Linz A‐4040 Austria

Institute of Applied Chemistry IMC Krems University of Applied Sciences Piaristengasse 1 Krems A‐3500 Austria

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41467-017-01812-w10.1038/s41467-017-01812-w ↗
2. 10.1039/D3TC03058J10.1039/D3TC03058J ↗
3. 10.1038/s41578-023-00622-510.1038/s41578-023-00622-5 ↗
4. 10.1002/smll.20220630910.1002/smll.202206309 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b0062410.1021/acs.accounts.7b00624 ↗
6. 10.1002/adbi.20170005210.1002/adbi.201700052 ↗
7. 10.1002/advs.20210470110.1002/advs.202104701 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0053910.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00539 ↗
9. 10.1002/admt.20220191110.1002/admt.202201911 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.10061610.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100616 ↗
11. 10.1126/sciadv.160164910.1126/sciadv.1601649 ↗
12. R. M.Miriani M. R.Abidian D. R.Kipke presented atAnn. Int. Conf.Vancouver BC Canada August2008.
13. 10.1002/aelm.20200051010.1002/aelm.202000510 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.12.10810.1016/j.snb.2017.12.108 ↗
15. Spencer A. R. · ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. · 2018 · 4 · 1558
16. 10.1038/s41428-023-00784-710.1038/s41428-023-00784-7 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41467-018-05848-410.1038/s41467-018-05848-4 ↗
18. 10.1002/admt.20190066210.1002/admt.201900662 ↗
19. 10.31635/ccschem.024.20240385810.31635/ccschem.024.202403858 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20230669110.1002/adma.202306691 ↗
21. 10.3390/polym908035410.3390/polym9080354 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.11941910.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119419 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsapm.2c0107810.1021/acsapm.2c01078 ↗
24. 10.1002/admt.20190069910.1002/admt.201900699 ↗
25. 10.1039/D4TC03264K10.1039/D4TC03264K ↗
26. 10.3389/fmats.2022.106376310.3389/fmats.2022.1063763 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10570-015-0770-410.1007/s10570-015-0770-4 ↗
28. 10.1088/1748-6041/4/4/04500910.1088/1748-6041/4/4/045009 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2009.11.00310.1016/j.synthmet.2009.11.003 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.222048810.1063/1.2220488 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.327859210.1063/1.3278592 ↗
32. 10.1002/adsu.20200020310.1002/adsu.202000203 ↗
33. 10.1117/12.86241110.1117/12.862411 ↗
34. 10.1002/polb.2433110.1002/polb.24331 ↗
35. 10.1039/C5TC03664J10.1039/C5TC03664J ↗
36. 10.1002/cyto.a.2114310.1002/cyto.a.21143 ↗
37. 10.1309/2H43-5EC2-K22U-YC6T10.1309/2H43-5EC2-K22U-YC6T ↗
38. 10.1016/j.microc.2024.11074010.1016/j.microc.2024.110740 ↗
39. ISO 10993–5:2009 (2009) Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices. Part 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity Geneva Switzerland https://www.iso.org/standard/36406.html.
40. 10.1021/acsami.5b0727310.1021/acsami.5b07273 ↗
41. 10.1002/smll.20230753610.1002/smll.202307536 ↗
42. 10.1126/sciadv.abo320910.1126/sciadv.abo3209 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41467-024-50264-610.1038/s41467-024-50264-6 ↗
44. 10.1002/jbm.a.3631410.1002/jbm.a.36314 ↗
45. 10.3390/ijms22231282710.3390/ijms222312827 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0107410.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01074 ↗
47. 10.1186/s12951-024-02791-z10.1186/s12951-024-02791-z ↗
48. Skotheim T. A. · 1986
49. 10.1039/D0RA07800J10.1039/D0RA07800J ↗
50. Zhang Z. · 2017
51. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0171010.1021/acsomega.7b01710 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.07.02410.1016/j.polymer.2009.07.024 ↗
53. 10.1039/C5TC02074C10.1039/C5TC02074C ↗
54. 10.1126/sciadv.140025110.1126/sciadv.1400251 ↗
55. 10.1039/D2CS00920J10.1039/D2CS00920J ↗
56. 10.1038/s41467-022-33553-w10.1038/s41467-022-33553-w ↗
57. 10.1002/adma.20240509410.1002/adma.202405094 ↗
58. 10.1002/adma.20241582710.1002/adma.202415827 ↗