Noise Spectroscopy Analysis of Ion Behavior in Liquid Gate‐All‐Around Silicon Nanowire Field‐Effect Transistor Biosensors
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The transport and noise properties of fabricated, high‐performance, gate‐all‐around silicon liquid‐gated nanowire field‐effect transistor devices are investigated in different concentrations of MgCl2 solutions. The critical concentration of MgCl2 solution for charge inversion at the solid‐liquid interface is verified using noise spectroscopy and confirmed using the capacitance‐voltage measurement technique. In this study, it is found that the Hooge parameter (αH) and the equivalent input noise (SU) can effectively reflect the ion behavior on the surface of the nanowire. Moreover, the noise curves for αH and SU indicate two turning points at concentrations of 10−4 and 10−1 m for a peak and a valley, respectively. The noise transformation is related to the behavior of ions near the solid‐liquid interface in solutions with different MgCl2 concentrations is revealed. The results show that noise spectroscopy is a powerful method for monitoring charge dynamic processes in the research field of biosensors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Semiconductor materials and devices · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Biological Information Processing, Bioelectronics (IBI‐3) Forschungszentrum Jülich 52425 Jülich Germany
Experimentelle Physik 2 TU Dortmund University 44227 Dortmund Germany
Funding
Helmholtz-Fonds · China Scholarship Council
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TBME.1972.32413710.1109/TBME.1972.324137 ↗
2. 10.1073/pnas.040615910110.1073/pnas.0406159101 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.106271110.1126/science.1062711 ↗
4. 10.1002/biot.20110013210.1002/biot.201100132 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.360815510.1063/1.3608155 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0350810.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03508 ↗
7. 10.1088/1361-6528/aaaf9e10.1088/1361-6528/aaaf9e ↗
8. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.11205310.1016/j.bios.2020.112053 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0111510.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01115 ↗
10. 10.1038/srep4130510.1038/srep41305 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.580210.1103/PhysRevE.60.5802 ↗
12. 10.1021/jp105434210.1021/jp1054342 ↗
13. Yates D. E. · J Chem Soc. · 1973 · 70 · 1807
14. 10.1021/nn401678u10.1021/nn401678u ↗
15. 10.1038/s41563-017-0016-y10.1038/s41563-017-0016-y ↗
16. 10.1002/admi.20220114210.1002/admi.202201142 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.07680210.1103/PhysRevLett.101.076802 ↗
18. 10.1088/0268-1242/25/2/02401510.1088/0268-1242/25/2/024015 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.235831610.1063/1.2358316 ↗
20. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/10/04010.1088/0957-4484/17/10/040 ↗
21. Zhang P. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2021 · 129 · 10
22. 10.1063/1.498222210.1063/1.4982222 ↗
23. Besteman K. · Phys Rev. · 2005 · 72
24. Christensenand P. A. · 1994 · 379
25. 10.1557/adv.2018.33210.1557/adv.2018.332 ↗
26. 10.1016/0375-9601(69)90076-010.1016/0375-9601(69)90076-0 ↗
27. Hartman M. · 2007 · 21610.1007/978-1-4020-5910-0 ↗
28. 10.3938/jkps.53.33910.3938/jkps.53.339 ↗
29. 10.1021/nl070901710.1021/nl0709017 ↗
30. 10.1088/0957-4484/25/27/27530210.1088/0957-4484/25/27/275302 ↗
31. Li J. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 20
32. 10.1080/0001873890010112210.1080/00018738900101122 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.sse.2017.02.00510.1016/j.sse.2017.02.005 ↗
34. 10.1109/TCOMM.2016.258993510.1109/TCOMM.2016.2589935 ↗
35. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab175e10.1088/1361-6528/ab175e ↗
36. Kutovyi Y. · IEEE · 2017
37. 10.1109/TED.2013.226819310.1109/TED.2013.2268193 ↗