Reaction and Energy Levels at Oxide–Oxide Heterojunction Interfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Oxide–oxide heterojunction interfaces (OHIs) are foundations for many applications such as transistors, optoelectronic devices, and chemical catalysis. The formation of OHIs involves complex events such as charge transfer, interfacial diffusion, and chemical reactions. These events collectively contribute to an OHI's energy structure and to its ability to perform an intended application. Here, multiple MoO3/oxide interfaces are studied at which changes in multiple oxidation states Mox+ can be easily tracked. For the formation of reactive interfaces, it is found that the primary driving force behind the reduction of MoO3 is redox reactions at the interfaces. For the nonreactive interface, the reduction of MoO3 occurs as a result of various factors such as oxygen deficiency. At these OHIs, band bending and formation of interface dipole are observed. It is discovered that the degrees of interface dipole and work function at the OHIs scale linearly as a function of the contacting oxide's work function. These findings provide the guide in designing OHIs for a specific application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Semiconductor materials and devices · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Toronto Toronto M5G 3E4 Canada
Department of Physics Center for Optoelectronics Engineering Research Yunnan University Kunming 650091 China
School of Microelectronics Southern University of Science and Technology Shenzhen 518055 China
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.118186210.1126/science.1181862 ↗
2. Zhong Z. · Phys. Rev. X · 2017 · 7 · 011023
3. 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-062910-14044510.1146/annurev-conmatphys-062910-140445 ↗
4. Hwang H. Y. · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 10 · 1038
5. 10.1038/nmat315910.1038/nmat3159 ↗
6. 10.1038/nature0097710.1038/nature00977 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.11.05510.1016/j.jmmm.2014.11.055 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41598-017-04884-210.1038/s41598-017-04884-2 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20120099310.1002/adfm.201200993 ↗
10. 10.1126/sciadv.160264010.1126/sciadv.1602640 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.509297910.1063/1.5092979 ↗
12. 10.3390/catal711034110.3390/catal7110341 ↗
13. Khojastehnezhad A. · J. Mex. Chem. Soc. · 2015 · 59 · 29
14. 10.1006/jcat.1993.121810.1006/jcat.1993.1218 ↗
15. 10.1007/978-3-319-74989-110.1007/978-3-319-74989-1 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20120061510.1002/adfm.201200615 ↗
17. 10.1039/C7CP00644F10.1039/C7CP00644F ↗
18. 10.1038/s41598-018-28522-710.1038/s41598-018-28522-7 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0058510.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00585 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.15010.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.150 ↗
21. 10.3390/app504069510.3390/app5040695 ↗
22. 10.1155/2013/76593810.1155/2013/765938 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.sse.2017.01.01110.1016/j.sse.2017.01.011 ↗
24. Sahari S. K. · J. Telecommun. Electron. Comput. Eng. · 2018 · 10 · 61
25. Robie R. A. · 1995
26. Lide D. R. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 4538
27. 10.1080/0141861940824292910.1080/01418619408242929 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.164462310.1063/1.1644623 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.493757310.1063/1.4937573 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.34718110.1063/1.347181 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.10243510.1063/1.102435 ↗
32. 10.1021/cr60291a00210.1021/cr60291a002 ↗
33. 10.1134/S003602440611025210.1134/S0036024406110252 ↗
34. 10.1515/zpch-2014-000210.1515/zpch-2014-0002 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.08.03610.1016/j.solmat.2013.08.036 ↗
36. 10.1002/adma.20170041410.1002/adma.201700414 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.502517510.1063/1.5025175 ↗
38. 10.1021/jp108281m10.1021/jp108281m ↗
39. 10.1002/sia.74015010910.1002/sia.740150109 ↗
40. 10.1002/sia.134410.1002/sia.1344 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.12043810.1063/1.120438 ↗
42. Powell C. J. · 2001