Cr 2 AlC: A High‐Temperature Transparent Conducting Ceramic
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Transparent conductors with high conductivity, optical transparency, and thermal stability are critical for next‐generation optoelectronic devices, yet such materials are scarce. Here, we demonstrate that epitaxial Cr 2 AlC(0001)/Al 2 O 3 (0001) layers exhibit a unique combination of these properties. The optical transmittance of ultrathin layers reaches 85% at 900 nm and remains above 21% across the near‐infrared (NIR)ultraviolet (UV) range, in good agreement with first‐principles optical properties predictions which reveal a small plasma frequency and a low cross‐section for interband transitions. Cr 2 AlC has a room‐temperature bulk resistivity ρ o = 42.5 µΩcm and an exceptionally small resistivity scaling with a negligible (<4%) resistivity increase down to 10 nm, an effective bulk electron mean free path λ < 2 nm at both 295 and 77 K, and a temperature‐independent effective ρ o λ < 3 × 10 −16 Ωm 2 that is smaller than that of all known elemental metals. An 11.1‐nm‐thick Cr 2 AlC layer achieves a benchmark Φ TC ≈ 0.004 Ω −1 in the near infrared (900 nm), comparable to state‐of‐art transparent conductors including ultra‐thin silver and carbon‐based materials. These results, in combination with the known oxidation stability to 1073–1373 K, establish Cr 2 AlC as a uniquely robust, high‐temperature stable and scalable transparent conductor, paving the way for advanced extreme‐environment optoelectronics and photonics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy New York USA
Funding
National Science Foundation
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adfm.20160664110.1002/adfm.201606641 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20130008410.1002/adma.201300084 ↗
3. 10.1557/mrs2000.14710.1557/mrs2000.147 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20030037810.1002/adma.200300378 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.solmat.2007.04.03110.1016/j.solmat.2007.04.031 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.02.00210.1016/j.tsf.2014.02.002 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20160259810.1002/aenm.201602598 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms1377110.1038/ncomms13771 ↗
9. 10.1021/la300720y10.1021/la300720y ↗
10. 10.1063/1.37170810.1063/1.371708 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.12646110.1063/1.126461 ↗
12. 10.1109/JDT.2011.215183010.1109/JDT.2011.2151830 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.09.00910.1016/j.tsf.2007.09.009 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.220988710.1063/1.2209887 ↗
15. 10.1021/ja072222410.1021/ja0722224 ↗
16. 10.1021/nl801827v10.1021/nl801827v ↗
17. 10.1016/j.nantod.2015.11.00510.1016/j.nantod.2015.11.005 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.121882910.1126/science.1218829 ↗
19. 10.1021/nl902458j10.1021/nl902458j ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20070013410.1002/adma.200700134 ↗
21. 10.1002/adom.20200129810.1002/adom.202001298 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20210933010.1002/adfm.202109330 ↗
23. 10.1002/aelm.20210097010.1002/aelm.202100970 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.orgel.2008.10.00810.1016/j.orgel.2008.10.008 ↗
25. 10.1002/adfm.20110177510.1002/adfm.201101775 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20100318810.1002/adma.201003188 ↗
27. 10.1017/S030500410001995210.1017/S0305004100019952 ↗
28. 10.1080/0001873520010115110.1080/00018735200101151 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.315727110.1063/1.3157271 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.1.138210.1103/PhysRevB.1.1382 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.23542310.1103/PhysRevB.84.235423 ↗
32. G.Hegde R. C.Bowen andM. S.Rodder “Is Electron Transport in Nanocrystalline Cu Interconnects Surface Dominated or Grain Boundary Dominated ”IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference/Advanced Metallization Conference (IITC/AMC)(IEEE 2016):114–116.10.1109/IITC-AMC.2016.7507701 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.513367110.1063/1.5133671 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.348041910.1063/1.3480419 ↗
35. 10.1146/annurev‐matsci‐070511‐15504810.1146/annurev‐matsci‐070511‐155048 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.348935710.1063/1.3489357 ↗
37. 10.1063/5.007887710.1063/5.0078877 ↗
38. 10.1021/cm500641a10.1021/cm500641a ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20200109310.1002/adma.202001093 ↗
40. 10.1002/adma.20200091910.1002/adma.202000919 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsami.1c1210010.1021/acsami.1c12100 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0079‐6786(00)00006‐610.1016/S0079‐6786(00)00006‐6 ↗
43. 10.1511/2001.28.33410.1511/2001.28.334 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12614110.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126141 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.11512010.1103/PhysRevB.72.115120 ↗
46. 10.1016/S1359‐6462(96)00418‐610.1016/S1359‐6462(96)00418‐6 ↗
47. 10.1179/1743280410Y.000000000110.1179/1743280410Y.0000000001 ↗
48. 10.1007/s11661‐999‐0325‐010.1007/s11661‐999‐0325‐0 ↗
49. 10.1080/21663831.2017.133353710.1080/21663831.2017.1333537 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsami.1c2051610.1021/acsami.1c20516 ↗
51. 10.1063/5.005454210.1063/5.0054542 ↗
52. 10.1557/jmr.2007.028410.1557/jmr.2007.0284 ↗
53. C.Adelmann K.Sankaran S.Dutta et al. “Alternative Metals: From Ab Initio Screening to Calibrated Narrow Line Models ”In IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference (IITC)(IEEE 2018):154–156 https://doi.org/10.1109/IITC.2018.8456484.10.1109/IITC.2018.8456484 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.05600210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.056002 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.solmat.2023.11243310.1016/j.solmat.2023.112433 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.01.00910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.01.009 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.04.12910.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.04.129 ↗
58. 10.3139/146.11043910.3139/146.110439 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.08610.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.086 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.02410.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.024 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.494221610.1063/1.4942216 ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.08500210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.085002 ↗
63. 10.1557/s43577-021-00192-310.1557/s43577-021-00192-3 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.07542410.1103/PhysRevB.84.075424 ↗
65. In‐situ Hot Pressing/Solid‐liquid Reaction Synthesis of Bulk Cr2AlC
66. 10.1016/j.physb.2010.08.03810.1016/j.physb.2010.08.038 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.ssc.2004.02.04710.1016/j.ssc.2004.02.047 ↗
68. 10.1080/21663831.2016.115752510.1080/21663831.2016.1157525 ↗
69. 10.1116/1.504995710.1116/1.5049957 ↗
70. 10.1063/1.504643010.1063/1.5046430 ↗
71. 10.1116/1.506546810.1116/1.5065468 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.07.03810.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.07.038 ↗
73. 10.1063/1.233568110.1063/1.2335681 ↗
74. 10.1080/21663831.2021.192051010.1080/21663831.2021.1920510 ↗
75. 10.1063/1.179057110.1063/1.1790571 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.01810.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.018 ↗
77. 10.1063/1.500411810.1063/1.5004118 ↗
78. 10.1063/1.502057710.1063/1.5020577 ↗
79. 10.1002/adem.20040009610.1002/adem.200400096 ↗
80. 10.1007/BF0090571010.1007/BF00905710 ↗
81. Scabarozi T. H. · 2009
82. D.Gall A.Jog andT.Zhou “Narrow interconnects: The most conductive metalsIn2020 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) ” (IEEE 2020):32.3.1–32.3.4.10.1109/IEDM13553.2020.9372060 ↗
83. 10.3390/nano1306095710.3390/nano13060957 ↗
84. 10.1063/5.019090510.1063/5.0190905 ↗
85. 10.1063/1.508645810.1063/1.5086458 ↗
86. 10.1109/TED.2019.293463610.1109/TED.2019.2934636 ↗
87. 10.1109/TED.2019.292431210.1109/TED.2019.2924312 ↗
88. 10.1063/1.368497610.1063/1.3684976 ↗
89. 10.1109/TED.2020.304020210.1109/TED.2020.3040202 ↗
90. 10.1063/5.006084510.1063/5.0060845 ↗
91. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.19516810.1103/PhysRevB.96.195168 ↗
92. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.16540610.1103/PhysRevB.97.165406 ↗
93. 10.1063/1.499400110.1063/1.4994001 ↗
94. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.15540610.1103/PhysRevB.79.155406 ↗
95. 10.1021/acsami.5b0654010.1021/acsami.5b06540 ↗
96. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.10.04710.1016/j.tsf.2007.10.047 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.12.26510.1016/j.tsf.2005.12.265 ↗
98. 10.1038/nmat449310.1038/nmat4493 ↗
99. 10.1038/s42005‐020‐0372‐910.1038/s42005‐020‐0372‐9 ↗
100. 10.1063/1.32324010.1063/1.323240 ↗