journal article·2026-03Open access

Cr 2 AlC: A High‐Temperature Transparent Conducting Ceramic

Baiwei Wang, Atharv Jog, Peijiao Fang, Sushant Kumar, Rui Shu, Jian Shi, Ravishankar Sundararaman, Daniel Gall

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Transparent conductors with high conductivity, optical transparency, and thermal stability are critical for next‐generation optoelectronic devices, yet such materials are scarce. Here, we demonstrate that epitaxial Cr 2 AlC(0001)/Al 2 O 3 (0001) layers exhibit a unique combination of these properties. The optical transmittance of ultrathin layers reaches 85% at 900 nm and remains above 21% across the near‐infrared (NIR)ultraviolet (UV) range, in good agreement with first‐principles optical properties predictions which reveal a small plasma frequency and a low cross‐section for interband transitions. Cr 2 AlC has a room‐temperature bulk resistivity ρ o = 42.5 µΩcm and an exceptionally small resistivity scaling with a negligible (<4%) resistivity increase down to 10 nm, an effective bulk electron mean free path λ < 2 nm at both 295 and 77 K, and a temperature‐independent effective ρ o λ < 3 × 10 −16 Ωm 2 that is smaller than that of all known elemental metals. An 11.1‐nm‐thick Cr 2 AlC layer achieves a benchmark Φ TC ≈ 0.004 Ω −1 in the near infrared (900 nm), comparable to state‐of‐art transparent conductors including ultra‐thin silver and carbon‐based materials. These results, in combination with the known oxidation stability to 1073–1373 K, establish Cr 2 AlC as a uniquely robust, high‐temperature stable and scalable transparent conductor, paving the way for advanced extreme‐environment optoelectronics and photonics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy New York USA

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adfm.20160664110.1002/adfm.201606641 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20130008410.1002/adma.201300084 ↗
3. 10.1557/mrs2000.14710.1557/mrs2000.147 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20030037810.1002/adma.200300378 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.solmat.2007.04.03110.1016/j.solmat.2007.04.031 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.02.00210.1016/j.tsf.2014.02.002 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20160259810.1002/aenm.201602598 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms1377110.1038/ncomms13771 ↗
9. 10.1021/la300720y10.1021/la300720y ↗
10. 10.1063/1.37170810.1063/1.371708 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.12646110.1063/1.126461 ↗
12. 10.1109/JDT.2011.215183010.1109/JDT.2011.2151830 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.09.00910.1016/j.tsf.2007.09.009 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.220988710.1063/1.2209887 ↗
15. 10.1021/ja072222410.1021/ja0722224 ↗
16. 10.1021/nl801827v10.1021/nl801827v ↗
17. 10.1016/j.nantod.2015.11.00510.1016/j.nantod.2015.11.005 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.121882910.1126/science.1218829 ↗
19. 10.1021/nl902458j10.1021/nl902458j ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20070013410.1002/adma.200700134 ↗
21. 10.1002/adom.20200129810.1002/adom.202001298 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20210933010.1002/adfm.202109330 ↗
23. 10.1002/aelm.20210097010.1002/aelm.202100970 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.orgel.2008.10.00810.1016/j.orgel.2008.10.008 ↗
25. 10.1002/adfm.20110177510.1002/adfm.201101775 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20100318810.1002/adma.201003188 ↗
27. 10.1017/S030500410001995210.1017/S0305004100019952 ↗
28. 10.1080/0001873520010115110.1080/00018735200101151 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.315727110.1063/1.3157271 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.1.138210.1103/PhysRevB.1.1382 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.23542310.1103/PhysRevB.84.235423 ↗
32. G.Hegde R. C.Bowen andM. S.Rodder “Is Electron Transport in Nanocrystalline Cu Interconnects Surface Dominated or Grain Boundary Dominated ”IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference/Advanced Metallization Conference (IITC/AMC)(IEEE 2016):114–116.10.1109/IITC-AMC.2016.7507701 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.513367110.1063/1.5133671 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.348041910.1063/1.3480419 ↗
35. 10.1146/annurev‐matsci‐070511‐15504810.1146/annurev‐matsci‐070511‐155048 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.348935710.1063/1.3489357 ↗
37. 10.1063/5.007887710.1063/5.0078877 ↗
38. 10.1021/cm500641a10.1021/cm500641a ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20200109310.1002/adma.202001093 ↗
40. 10.1002/adma.20200091910.1002/adma.202000919 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsami.1c1210010.1021/acsami.1c12100 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0079‐6786(00)00006‐610.1016/S0079‐6786(00)00006‐6 ↗
43. 10.1511/2001.28.33410.1511/2001.28.334 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12614110.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126141 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.11512010.1103/PhysRevB.72.115120 ↗
46. 10.1016/S1359‐6462(96)00418‐610.1016/S1359‐6462(96)00418‐6 ↗
47. 10.1179/1743280410Y.000000000110.1179/1743280410Y.0000000001 ↗
48. 10.1007/s11661‐999‐0325‐010.1007/s11661‐999‐0325‐0 ↗
49. 10.1080/21663831.2017.133353710.1080/21663831.2017.1333537 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsami.1c2051610.1021/acsami.1c20516 ↗
51. 10.1063/5.005454210.1063/5.0054542 ↗
52. 10.1557/jmr.2007.028410.1557/jmr.2007.0284 ↗
53. C.Adelmann K.Sankaran S.Dutta et al. “Alternative Metals: From Ab Initio Screening to Calibrated Narrow Line Models ”In IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference (IITC)(IEEE 2018):154–156 https://doi.org/10.1109/IITC.2018.8456484.10.1109/IITC.2018.8456484 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.05600210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.056002 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.solmat.2023.11243310.1016/j.solmat.2023.112433 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.01.00910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.01.009 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.04.12910.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.04.129 ↗
58. 10.3139/146.11043910.3139/146.110439 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.08610.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.086 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.02410.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.024 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.494221610.1063/1.4942216 ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.08500210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.085002 ↗
63. 10.1557/s43577-021-00192-310.1557/s43577-021-00192-3 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.07542410.1103/PhysRevB.84.075424 ↗
65. In‐situ Hot Pressing/Solid‐liquid Reaction Synthesis of Bulk Cr2AlC
66. 10.1016/j.physb.2010.08.03810.1016/j.physb.2010.08.038 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.ssc.2004.02.04710.1016/j.ssc.2004.02.047 ↗
68. 10.1080/21663831.2016.115752510.1080/21663831.2016.1157525 ↗
69. 10.1116/1.504995710.1116/1.5049957 ↗
70. 10.1063/1.504643010.1063/1.5046430 ↗
71. 10.1116/1.506546810.1116/1.5065468 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.07.03810.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.07.038 ↗
73. 10.1063/1.233568110.1063/1.2335681 ↗
74. 10.1080/21663831.2021.192051010.1080/21663831.2021.1920510 ↗
75. 10.1063/1.179057110.1063/1.1790571 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.01810.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.018 ↗
77. 10.1063/1.500411810.1063/1.5004118 ↗
78. 10.1063/1.502057710.1063/1.5020577 ↗
79. 10.1002/adem.20040009610.1002/adem.200400096 ↗
80. 10.1007/BF0090571010.1007/BF00905710 ↗
81. Scabarozi T. H. · 2009
82. D.Gall A.Jog andT.Zhou “Narrow interconnects: The most conductive metalsIn2020 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) ” (IEEE 2020):32.3.1–32.3.4.10.1109/IEDM13553.2020.9372060 ↗
83. 10.3390/nano1306095710.3390/nano13060957 ↗
84. 10.1063/5.019090510.1063/5.0190905 ↗
85. 10.1063/1.508645810.1063/1.5086458 ↗
86. 10.1109/TED.2019.293463610.1109/TED.2019.2934636 ↗
87. 10.1109/TED.2019.292431210.1109/TED.2019.2924312 ↗
88. 10.1063/1.368497610.1063/1.3684976 ↗
89. 10.1109/TED.2020.304020210.1109/TED.2020.3040202 ↗
90. 10.1063/5.006084510.1063/5.0060845 ↗
91. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.19516810.1103/PhysRevB.96.195168 ↗
92. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.16540610.1103/PhysRevB.97.165406 ↗
93. 10.1063/1.499400110.1063/1.4994001 ↗
94. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.15540610.1103/PhysRevB.79.155406 ↗
95. 10.1021/acsami.5b0654010.1021/acsami.5b06540 ↗
96. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.10.04710.1016/j.tsf.2007.10.047 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.12.26510.1016/j.tsf.2005.12.265 ↗
98. 10.1038/nmat449310.1038/nmat4493 ↗
99. 10.1038/s42005‐020‐0372‐910.1038/s42005‐020‐0372‐9 ↗
100. 10.1063/1.32324010.1063/1.323240 ↗