journal article·2022-01

Formation of MoO3/Organic Interfaces

Yan Wu, Juntao Hu, Zhenxin Yang, Dengke Wang, Yong‐Biao Zhao, Tao Zhang, Nan Chen, Di Wu, Zheng‐Hong Lu

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 9· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Molybdenum trioxide (MoO3) has been extensively used in numerous organic semiconductor devices for hole injection and extraction. In this paper, photoelectron spectroscopy combined with cleavage and sputter depth profile has been used to probe the structures of buried MoO3/organic semiconductor interfaces. Organics used in this work include: tris(4‐carbazoyl‐9‐ylphenyl)amine (TCTA), N,N′‐bis(naphthalene‐l‐yl)‐N,N′‐bis(phenyl)benzidine (NPB), 4,4′‐bis(carbazol‐9‐yl)‐2,2′‐biphenyl (CBP), and 1,3‐bis(N‐carbazolyl) benzene (mCP). It is found that there are two distinct types of interfaces: sharp interfaces (type‐I) where the oxide layer has limited or no diffusion when deposited on organics that have a high glass transition temperature such as TCTA and NPB; mixed interfaces (type‐II) where the formation of interfaces is followed by significant diffusion and reaction on organics having low glass transition temperatures such as CBP and mCP. The causes for these two types of interfaces are discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Lakeside AR/VR Laboratory International Joint Research Center for Optoelectronic and Engineering Research Yunnan University Kunming Yunnan 650091 China

Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Toronto Toronto Ontario M5S 3E4 Canada

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat315910.1038/nmat3159 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.212614010.1063/1.2126140 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.226892310.1063/1.2268923 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.303907610.1063/1.3039076 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.326708410.1063/1.3267084 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.323192810.1063/1.3231928 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.orgel.2009.05.00710.1016/j.orgel.2009.05.007 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.309990310.1063/1.3099903 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.326708210.1063/1.3267082 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2010.01.00510.1016/j.jlumin.2010.01.005 ↗
11. 10.1039/C0JM03048A10.1039/C0JM03048A ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20120163010.1002/adma.201201630 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20120018510.1002/adfm.201200185 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.368793310.1063/1.3687933 ↗
15. 10.1088/1674-1056/22/2/02780510.1088/1674-1056/22/2/027805 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.01.01110.1016/j.orgel.2014.01.011 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.04.01010.1016/j.orgel.2015.04.010 ↗
18. 10.1109/TED.2017.269636610.1109/TED.2017.2696366 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.10544510.1016/j.orgel.2019.105445 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41377-021-00559-w10.1038/s41377-021-00559-w ↗
21. 10.1007/s12274-020-2919-110.1007/s12274-020-2919-1 ↗
22. 10.1021/ja071658g10.1021/ja071658g ↗
23. 10.1063/1.483245510.1063/1.4832455 ↗
24. 10.1109/LED.2016.262018410.1109/LED.2016.2620184 ↗
25. 10.1002/aenm.20160067010.1002/aenm.201600670 ↗
26. 10.1039/c0jm01163k10.1039/c0jm01163k ↗
27. 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.07.01610.1016/j.orgel.2013.07.016 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.0c1218810.1021/acsami.0c12188 ↗
29. 10.1038/srep2110910.1038/srep21109 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.143316610.1063/1.1433166 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.149447010.1063/1.1494470 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.00610.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.006 ↗
33. Hu J. · Phys. Status Solidi B · 2002 · 2100130
34. 10.1016/0169-4332(95)00317-710.1016/0169-4332(95)00317-7 ↗
35. 10.1021/jp402684c10.1021/jp402684c ↗
36. 10.1063/1.11878210.1063/1.118782 ↗
37. 10.5194/acp-18-6331-201810.5194/acp-18-6331-2018 ↗
38. 10.1039/C2TC00305H10.1039/C2TC00305H ↗
39. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.05.02510.1016/j.orgel.2018.05.025 ↗
40. 10.1134/S002136401919010X10.1134/S002136401919010X ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.25610310.1103/PhysRevLett.106.256103 ↗
42. Ohring M. · 2002