Bimodal Gating Mechanism in Hybrid Thin‐Film Transistors Based on Dynamically Reconfigurable Nanoscale Biopolymer Interfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In recent years, increased control over naturally derived structural protein formulations and their self‐assembly has enabled the application of high‐resolution manufacturing techniques to silk‐based materials, leading to bioactive interfaces with unprecedented miniaturized formats and functionalities. Here, a hybrid biopolymer–semiconductor device, obtained by integrating nanoscale silk layers in a well‐established class of inorganic field‐effect transistors (silk‐FETs), is presented. The devices offer two distinct modes of operation—either traditional field‐effect or electrolyte‐gated—enabled by the precisely controlled thickness, morphology, and biochemistry of the integrated silk layers. The different operational modes are selectively accessed by dynamically modulating the free‐water content within the nanoscale protein layer from the vapor phase. The utility of these hybrid devices is illustrated in a highly sensitive and ultrafast breath sensor, highlighting the opportunities offered by the integration of nanoscale biomaterial interfaces in conjunction with traditional semiconductor devices, enabling functional outcomes at the intersection between the worlds of microelectronics and biology.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Silklab, Department of Biomedical Engineering Tufts University Medford MA 02155 USA
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Tufts University Medford MA 02155 USA
Department of Physics Tufts University Medford MA 02155 USA
Funding
Office of Naval Research
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/5.006034410.1063/5.0060344 ↗
2. 10.1038/nprot.2015.09110.1038/nprot.2015.091 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20200125810.1002/adma.202001258 ↗
4. 10.1038/srep2526310.1038/srep25263 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10963110.1016/j.matdes.2021.109631 ↗
6. 10.1515/nanoph-2020-035810.1515/nanoph-2020-0358 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20150427610.1002/adma.201504276 ↗
8. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.26410.1038/nphoton.2012.264 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20090316610.1002/adma.200903166 ↗
10. 10.1364/OME.38920610.1364/OME.389206 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20130282310.1002/adma.201302823 ↗
12. 10.1038/ncomms961210.1038/ncomms9612 ↗
13. 10.1038/nnano.2014.4710.1038/nnano.2014.47 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.8b1317010.1021/acsami.8b13170 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20190458810.1002/adfm.201904588 ↗
16. 10.1038/nature0309010.1038/nature03090 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0101410.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01014 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.05.01210.1016/j.orgel.2018.05.012 ↗
19. Park M. H. · RSC Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 5904
20. 10.1038/srep1308810.1038/srep13088 ↗
21. 10.1038/s43586-021-00065-810.1038/s43586-021-00065-8 ↗
22. 10.1002/mabi.20090029410.1002/mabi.200900294 ↗
23. 10.1002/app.4170210.1002/app.41702 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b0168510.1021/acs.biomac.5b01685 ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.191156311610.1073/pnas.1911563116 ↗
26. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.52394910.3389/fbioe.2020.523949 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.02.09010.1016/j.snb.2018.02.090 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.13114410.1016/j.snb.2021.131144 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20150424410.1002/adma.201504244 ↗
30. 10.3390/s2203125110.3390/s22031251 ↗
31. 10.3390/s1702040710.3390/s17020407 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41467-022-33133-y10.1038/s41467-022-33133-y ↗
33. 10.1038/nprot.2011.37910.1038/nprot.2011.379 ↗