journal article·2023-11

Bimodal Gating Mechanism in Hybrid Thin‐Film Transistors Based on Dynamically Reconfigurable Nanoscale Biopolymer Interfaces

Beom Joon Kim, Giorgio Ernesto Bonacchini, Nicholas A. Ostrovsky‐Snider, Fiorenzo G. Omenetto

Advanced Materials· Volume 35· Issue 45
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, increased control over naturally derived structural protein formulations and their self‐assembly has enabled the application of high‐resolution manufacturing techniques to silk‐based materials, leading to bioactive interfaces with unprecedented miniaturized formats and functionalities. Here, a hybrid biopolymer–semiconductor device, obtained by integrating nanoscale silk layers in a well‐established class of inorganic field‐effect transistors (silk‐FETs), is presented. The devices offer two distinct modes of operation—either traditional field‐effect or electrolyte‐gated—enabled by the precisely controlled thickness, morphology, and biochemistry of the integrated silk layers. The different operational modes are selectively accessed by dynamically modulating the free‐water content within the nanoscale protein layer from the vapor phase. The utility of these hybrid devices is illustrated in a highly sensitive and ultrafast breath sensor, highlighting the opportunities offered by the integration of nanoscale biomaterial interfaces in conjunction with traditional semiconductor devices, enabling functional outcomes at the intersection between the worlds of microelectronics and biology.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Silklab, Department of Biomedical Engineering Tufts University Medford MA 02155 USA

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Tufts University Medford MA 02155 USA

Department of Physics Tufts University Medford MA 02155 USA

Funding

Office of Naval Research

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/5.006034410.1063/5.0060344 ↗
2. 10.1038/nprot.2015.09110.1038/nprot.2015.091 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20200125810.1002/adma.202001258 ↗
4. 10.1038/srep2526310.1038/srep25263 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10963110.1016/j.matdes.2021.109631 ↗
6. 10.1515/nanoph-2020-035810.1515/nanoph-2020-0358 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20150427610.1002/adma.201504276 ↗
8. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.26410.1038/nphoton.2012.264 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20090316610.1002/adma.200903166 ↗
10. 10.1364/OME.38920610.1364/OME.389206 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20130282310.1002/adma.201302823 ↗
12. 10.1038/ncomms961210.1038/ncomms9612 ↗
13. 10.1038/nnano.2014.4710.1038/nnano.2014.47 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.8b1317010.1021/acsami.8b13170 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20190458810.1002/adfm.201904588 ↗
16. 10.1038/nature0309010.1038/nature03090 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0101410.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01014 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.05.01210.1016/j.orgel.2018.05.012 ↗
19. Park M. H. · RSC Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 5904
20. 10.1038/srep1308810.1038/srep13088 ↗
21. 10.1038/s43586-021-00065-810.1038/s43586-021-00065-8 ↗
22. 10.1002/mabi.20090029410.1002/mabi.200900294 ↗
23. 10.1002/app.4170210.1002/app.41702 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b0168510.1021/acs.biomac.5b01685 ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.191156311610.1073/pnas.1911563116 ↗
26. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.52394910.3389/fbioe.2020.523949 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.02.09010.1016/j.snb.2018.02.090 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.13114410.1016/j.snb.2021.131144 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20150424410.1002/adma.201504244 ↗
30. 10.3390/s2203125110.3390/s22031251 ↗
31. 10.3390/s1702040710.3390/s17020407 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41467-022-33133-y10.1038/s41467-022-33133-y ↗
33. 10.1038/nprot.2011.37910.1038/nprot.2011.379 ↗