Systematic Analysis of the Improvements in Magnetic Resonance Microscopy with Ferroelectric Composite Ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The spatial resolution and signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) attainable in magnetic resonance microscopy (MRM) are limited by intrinsic probe losses and probe–sample interactions. In this work, the possibility to exceed the SNR of a standard solenoid coil by more than a factor‐of‐two is demonstrated theoretically and experimentally. This improvement is achieved by exciting the first transverse electric mode of a low‐loss ceramic resonator instead of using the quasi‐static field of the metal‐wire solenoid coil. Based on theoretical considerations, a new probe for microscopy at 17 T is developed as a dielectric ring resonator made of ferroelectric/dielectric low‐loss composite ceramics precisely tunable via temperature control. Besides the twofold increase in SNR, compared with the solenoid probe, the proposed ceramic probe does not cause static‐field inhomogeneity and related image distortion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications · Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography · Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Aix Marseille Univ CNRS Centrale Marseille Institut Fresnel 13013 Marseille France
Multiwave Innovation SAS 13453 Marseille France
DRF/I2BM/Neurospin/UNIRS 91191 Gif‐sur‐Yvette Cedex France
ITMO University 197101 St. Petersburg Russia
Ceramics Co. Ltd. Saint‐Petersburg 194223 Russia
Department of Radiology C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI Leiden University Medical Center 2333 ZA Leiden The Netherlands
Funding
H2020 European Research Council · Russian Foundation for Basic Research · Russian Science Foundation
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Callaghan P. T. · 1993
2. 10.1038/322190a010.1038/322190a0 ↗
3. 10.1006/jmrb.1994.103910.1006/jmrb.1994.1039 ↗
4. 10.1152/ajpcell.1996.271.4.C129510.1152/ajpcell.1996.271.4.C1295 ↗
5. 10.1002/1522-2594(200007)44:1<19::AID-MRM4>3.0.CO;2-F10.1002/1522-2594(200007)44:1<19::AID-MRM4>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
6. 10.1038/srep3949610.1038/srep39496 ↗
7. 10.1073/pnas.140373911110.1073/pnas.1403739111 ↗
8. 10.1201/978131510732510.1201/9781315107325 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmr.2017.12.01610.1016/j.jmr.2017.12.016 ↗
10. 10.1002/mrm.2162910.1002/mrm.21629 ↗
11. 10.1002/nbm.139610.1002/nbm.1396 ↗
12. 10.1038/srep1114710.1038/srep11147 ↗
13. 10.1016/S1090-7807(02)00071-X10.1016/S1090-7807(02)00071-X ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.09.02110.1016/j.jmr.2010.09.021 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.270.5244.196710.1126/science.270.5244.1967 ↗
16. 10.1002/cmr.100810.1002/cmr.1008 ↗
17. 10.1006/jmrb.1996.015910.1006/jmrb.1996.0159 ↗
18. 10.1002/cmr.a.2021910.1002/cmr.a.20219 ↗
19. 10.1002/cmr.b.2011410.1002/cmr.b.20114 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.07.01210.1016/j.jmr.2009.07.012 ↗
21. 10.1002/1099-0534(2001)13:2<128::AID-CMR1002>3.0.CO;2-810.1002/1099-0534(2001)13:2<128::AID-CMR1002>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.05.00710.1016/j.jmr.2009.05.007 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.04.00810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.04.008 ↗
24. 10.1134/S106378340908004610.1134/S1063783409080046 ↗
25. 10.1080/00150193.2017.128276110.1080/00150193.2017.1282761 ↗
26. Kajfez D. · 1998
27. Pozar D. M. · 2012
28. 10.1049/iet-smt:2008012210.1049/iet-smt:20080122 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.297603310.1063/1.2976033 ↗
30. 10.1002/mrm.2089610.1002/mrm.20896 ↗