When Poor Exciton Dissociation Limits Photocurrents in Organic Solar Cells: Why Low Offset Non‐Fullerene Acceptor Blends Can't Be Efficient
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT It is a well‐established fact that the energetic offset between the donor and the acceptor components in organic solar cells dictates the tradeoff between photovoltage and photocurrent losses. Yet, a deeper understanding of the photophysical processes that ultimately limit photocurrent generation in low offset blends is needed for more informed future molecular and device design. This Perspective addresses the most important issues surrounding this topic, from the difficulty of accurately determining state energies and driving forces to bottlenecks in free‐charge generation arising from low energy offsets. Using experimental, analytical, and theoretical evidence, we then substantiate our view that the primary—if not the sole—cause of photocurrent losses in low offset non‐fullerene acceptor blends is the decay of excitons that did not undergo charge transfer. We conclude that the offset between the local exciton and the interfacial charge transfer state must be at least 100 meV, which translates into a frontier orbital offset of approximately 300 meV, similar to what has been proposed for fullerene‐based blends. We discuss the relevance of this finding with regard to the non‐radiative voltage loss of current high‐performance solar cells, and what measures should be taken to reduce this loss without impairing photovoltaic power generation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Fullerene Chemistry and Applications · Perovskite Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Physics and Optoelectronics of Soft Matter Institute of Physics and Astronomy University of Potsdam Potsdam‐Golm Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41563‐024‐02076‐810.1038/s41563‐024‐02076‐8 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41563‐024‐02102‐910.1038/s41563‐024‐02102‐9 ↗
3. 10.1002/aenm.20240438610.1002/aenm.202404386 ↗
4. 10.1007/s40843‐025‐3366‐910.1007/s40843‐025‐3366‐9 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.02010.1016/j.joule.2017.09.020 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467‐019‐10434‐310.1038/s41467‐019‐10434‐3 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41560‐020‐00684‐710.1038/s41560‐020‐00684‐7 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41563‐020‐00835‐x10.1038/s41563‐020‐00835‐x ↗
9. 10.1039/d1ma00293g10.1039/d1ma00293g ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0365610.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03656 ↗
11. 10.1002/admi.20220251510.1002/admi.202202515 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0094310.1021/acsenergylett.3c00943 ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20230098010.1002/aenm.202300980 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0057210.1021/acsenergylett.3c00572 ↗
15. 10.1039/d3ta01928d10.1039/d3ta01928d ↗
16. 10.1021/jacs.0c0489010.1021/jacs.0c04890 ↗
17. 10.1002/solr.20210096310.1002/solr.202100963 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c0186110.1021/acs.jpclett.3c01861 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.mattod.2024.09.00910.1016/j.mattod.2024.09.009 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0117510.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01175 ↗
21. 10.1103/PRXEnergy.3.02300810.1103/PRXEnergy.3.023008 ↗
22. 10.1021/jacs.8b1212610.1021/jacs.8b12126 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0124510.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01245 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c0074210.1021/acs.accounts.1c00742 ↗
25. Energetic Offset in Organic Solar Cells‐ Importance, Confusion and Obsession
26. 10.1038/s41467‐018‐05987‐810.1038/s41467‐018‐05987‐8 ↗
27. 10.1002/adom.20200199710.1002/adom.202001997 ↗
28. 10.1002/adom.20190154210.1002/adom.201901542 ↗
29. 10.1002/aenm.20200182810.1002/aenm.202001828 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41563‐018‐0128‐z10.1038/s41563‐018‐0128‐z ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0336510.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03365 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0257210.1021/acsenergylett.0c02572 ↗
33. 10.1039/D1EE03565G10.1039/D1EE03565G ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.768910.1103/PhysRevB.58.7689 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c0326210.1021/acs.jpclett.3c03262 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.12520410.1103/PhysRevB.81.125204 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.23530710.1103/PhysRevB.88.235307 ↗
38. 10.1002/adma.20220257510.1002/adma.202202575 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.12870110.1103/PhysRevLett.114.128701 ↗
40. 10.1002/aenm.20210342210.1002/aenm.202103422 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.10.01210.1016/j.joule.2022.10.012 ↗
42. 10.1002/aenm.20150012310.1002/aenm.201500123 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0157410.1021/acsenergylett.1c01574 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.matt.2024.10.00710.1016/j.matt.2024.10.007 ↗
45. 10.1002/adfm.20211318110.1002/adfm.202113181 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0223510.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02235 ↗
47. 10.1002/adfm.20230252010.1002/adfm.202302520 ↗
48. 10.1039/D2TC01918C10.1039/D2TC01918C ↗
49. 10.1063/1.489806810.1063/1.4898068 ↗
50. 10.1063/5.002228910.1063/5.0022289 ↗
51. 10.1039/d1ee01367j10.1039/d1ee01367j ↗
52. 10.1002/adma.20240057810.1002/adma.202400578 ↗
53. 10.1039/D4EE01409J10.1039/D4EE01409J ↗
54. 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.10092110.1016/j.surfin.2020.100921 ↗
55. 10.1039/D1QM00060H10.1039/D1QM00060H ↗
56. 10.1002/adma.20230200510.1002/adma.202302005 ↗
57. 10.1039/C6EE02598F10.1039/C6EE02598F ↗
58. 10.1002/aenm.20170085510.1002/aenm.201700855 ↗
59. 10.1038/s41560‐021‐00843‐410.1038/s41560‐021‐00843‐4 ↗
60. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0966310.1021/acs.jpcc.0c09663 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.43828210.1063/1.438282 ↗
62. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0009410.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00094 ↗
63. 10.1021/jz200155b10.1021/jz200155b ↗
64. 10.1002/solr.20240008310.1002/solr.202400083 ↗
65. 10.1038/s41467‐020‐19332‐510.1038/s41467‐020‐19332‐5 ↗
66. 10.1038/s41467‐020‐14549‐w10.1038/s41467‐020‐14549‐w ↗
67. 10.1016/j.orgel.2022.10660110.1016/j.orgel.2022.106601 ↗
68. 10.1039/c9ta04789a10.1039/c9ta04789a ↗
69. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0115410.1021/acsenergylett.1c01154 ↗
70. 10.1002/adfm.20210715710.1002/adfm.202107157 ↗
71. 10.1002/solr.20200078910.1002/solr.202000789 ↗
72. 10.1021/jacs.4c1111410.1021/jacs.4c11114 ↗
73. 10.1021/ja104272610.1021/ja1042726 ↗
74. 10.1126/science.121774510.1126/science.1217745 ↗
75. 10.1021/cm402403z10.1021/cm402403z ↗
76. 10.1039/d1ee02788c10.1039/d1ee02788c ↗
77. 10.1063/1.44724310.1063/1.447243 ↗
78. 10.1002/aenm.20240367510.1002/aenm.202403675 ↗
79. 10.1246/bcsj.75.163710.1246/bcsj.75.1637 ↗
80. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0921310.1021/acs.jpcc.7b09213 ↗
81. 10.1039/c7cp05938h10.1039/c7cp05938h ↗
82. 10.3390/molecules2819696810.3390/molecules28196968 ↗
83. 10.1002/advs.20250514310.1002/advs.202505143 ↗
84. 10.1002/aenm.20250395410.1002/aenm.202503954 ↗
85. A Combined Diffusion/Rate Equation Model to Describe Charge Generation in Phase‐Separated Donor‐Acceptor Blends
86. 10.1002/adma.20210178410.1002/adma.202101784 ↗
87. 10.1039/d4ee03815k10.1039/d4ee03815k ↗
88. 10.1088/2515‐7639/ac442b10.1088/2515‐7639/ac442b ↗
89. 10.1038/s41467‐025‐67722‐410.1038/s41467‐025‐67722‐4 ↗
90. 10.1039/D3SC05409H10.1039/D3SC05409H ↗
91. 10.1038/s41563‐026‐02509‐610.1038/s41563‐026‐02509‐6 ↗
92. 10.1039/d0sc04116e10.1039/d0sc04116e ↗
93. 10.1002/adma.20221117410.1002/adma.202211174 ↗
94. 10.1038/s41467‐020‐17867‐110.1038/s41467‐020‐17867‐1 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.mtadv.2021.10015410.1016/j.mtadv.2021.100154 ↗
96. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.19660210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.196602 ↗
97. 10.1063/1.293808810.1063/1.2938088 ↗
98. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c0212010.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02120 ↗
99. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0094510.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00945 ↗
100. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.11810.1038/nenergy.2016.118 ↗