journal article·2003-06

Capacity of timber roof trusses considering statistical system effects

M. Hansson, S. Thelandersson

Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff· Volume 61· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

For structural timber systems such as trusses, system effects related to strength variation within timber members has a significant effect on reliability. The system effect originates from the reduced probability that weak sections of timber coincide with the most stressed sections in the truss. In this paper, the strength variation within and between timber members is described with a statistical model earlier calibrated against data for Norway Spruce of Scandinavian origin. A method is presented to account for buckling effects when expressing the interaction between axial loading and bending in all sections of the truss members. The interaction is expressed in terms of a combined stress index, CSI, defined so that the failure criterion is CSI=1. For a given truss with given load, the cumulative distribution of CSI can be determined by Monte Carlo simulations based on the statistical model. By comparing the results with corresponding results obtained from deterministic engineering design, the statistical system effect is quantified. It is found that within member variability gives an extra capacity of 12% for Norway Spruce and 24% for Radiata Pine. Design rules proposed for Eurocode accounting for system effects in trusses give results slightly on the safe side compared to the results from the present study.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Wood Treatment and Properties · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Adjanohoun G (1997) Reliability based design of timber structures. Workshop, Paris, CTBA Paris
2. Bodig J (ed) (1992) Reliability-based design of engineered wood structures. NATO, ASI Series E—Vol. 215, Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, The Netherlands10.1007/978-94-015-8044-1 ↗
3. Buchanan AH (1984) Strength model and design method for bending and axial load interaction in timber members. Ph.D.-thesis, Dep. of Civ. Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
4. EN 384 (1995) Structural Timber—Determination of characteristic values of mechanical properties and density
5. Eurocode 5 (1993) Design of timber structures Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Bruxelles, Belgium
6. Foschi RO, Folz BR, Yao FZ (1989) Reliability-based design of wood structures. Structural Research Series, Report No. 34, Dep. of Civ. Eng., University of British Colombia, Vancouver, Canada
7. Glos P (1995) Solid timber—Strength classes. Timber Engineering STEP 1, Centrum Hout, The Netherlands
8. Höglund T (1968) Approximativ metod för dimensionering av böjd och tryckt stång. Kungl. Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm (Swedish)
9. Isaksson T (1998) Length and moment configuration factors. CIB-W18A-Timber structures, Paper 31-6-1. Savolinna, Finland
10. Isaksson T (1999) Modelling the variability of bending strength in structural timber. Length and load configuration effects. Report TVBK-1015, Dep. of Structural Engineering, Lund University
11. Johansson CJ, Boström L, Holmquist H, Hoffmeyer P, Bräuner L (1999) Laminations for glued laminated timber- Establishment of strength classes for visual strength grades and machine settings for glulam laminations of Nordic origin. SP Report 1998:38 Building Technology, Borås
12. Lam F, Varoglu E (1991a) Variation of tensile strength along the length of lumber. Part 1. Experimental. Wood Science and Technology 25:351–360
13. Lam F, Varoglu E (1991b) Variation of tensile strength along the length of lumber. Part 2. Model development and verification. Wood Science and Technology 25:449–45810.1021/es00015a011 ↗
14. Leicester RH, Beitinger HO, Fordham HF (1996) Equivalence of in-grade testing standards. CIB-W18A-Timber structures. Paper 29-6-2. Bordeaux, France
15. Madsen B (1992) Structural behaviour of timber. Timber engineering LTD, Vancouver Canada
16. Riberholt H (1990a) Analyses of timber trussed rafters of the W-type. CIB-W18A-Timber structures, Paper 23-14-1. Lisbon, Portugal
17. Riberholt H (1990b) Proposal for Eurocode 5 text on timber trussed rafters. CIB-W18A-Timber structures, Paper 23-14-2. Lisbon, Portugal
18. StBK-K2 (1973) kommentarer till Stålbyggnadsnorm 70. Knäckning, vippning och buckling. Statens Stålbyggnadskommitté. Stockholm. Sweden (Swedish)
19. Taylor SE, Bender DA (1991) Stochastic model for localized tensile strength and modulus of elasticity in timber. Wood and Fiber Science 23(4):501–519