Spontaneous Modulation Doping in Semi‐Crystalline Conjugated Polymers Leads to High Conductivity at Low Doping Concentration
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The possibility to control the charge carrier density through doping is one of the defining properties of semiconductors. For organic semiconductors, the doping process is known to come with several problems associated with the dopant compromising the charge carrier mobility by deteriorating the host morphology and/or introducing Coulomb traps. While for inorganic semiconductors these factors can be mitigated through (top‐down) modulation doping, this concept has not been employed in organics. Here, this work shows that properly chosen host/dopant combinations can give rise to spontaneous, bottom‐up modulation doping, in which the dopants preferentially sit in an amorphous phase, while the actual charge transport occurs predominantly in a crystalline phase with an unaltered microstructure, spatially separating dopants and mobile charges. Combining experiments and numerical simulations, this work shows that this leads to exceptionally high conductivities at relatively low dopant concentrations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Molecular Systems Engineering and Advanced Materials Heidelberg University Im Neuenheimer Feld 225 69120 Heidelberg Germany
Institute Charles Sadron UPR022 CNRS – Université de Strasbourg Strasbourg 67034 France
Department of Chemistry‐Ångström Physical Chemistry Uppsala University Uppsala 75120 Sweden
Université de Strasbourg CNRS ICPEES UMR 7515 Strasbourg F‐67087 France
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsapm.2c0051910.1021/acsapm.2c00519 ↗
2. 10.1039/c2tc00584k10.1039/c2tc00584k ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20070305010.1002/adma.200703050 ↗
4. 10.1002/aelm.20180082110.1002/aelm.201800821 ↗
5. 10.1002/adom.20180052210.1002/adom.201800522 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20210298810.1002/adma.202102988 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20220279710.1002/aenm.202202797 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20220207510.1002/adfm.202202075 ↗
9. 10.1039/D1MH01079D10.1039/D1MH01079D ↗
10. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b0082010.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00820 ↗
11. 10.1016/0379-6779(91)91484-R10.1016/0379-6779(91)91484-R ↗
12. 10.1016/0032-3861(92)90525-210.1016/0032-3861(92)90525-2 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.23520310.1103/PhysRevB.93.235203 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.23520210.1103/PhysRevB.72.235202 ↗
15. 10.1039/C8TC01593G10.1039/C8TC01593G ↗
16. 10.1039/D3TC01148H10.1039/D3TC01148H ↗
17. 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.11.02010.1016/j.orgel.2017.11.020 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c0055410.1021/acs.macromol.1c00554 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsapm.3c0097210.1021/acsapm.3c00972 ↗
20. 10.1039/D0TC02828B10.1039/D0TC02828B ↗
21. 10.1039/D2TC03600B10.1039/D2TC03600B ↗
22. 10.1002/047006832910.1002/0470068329 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.03400510.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.034005 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.9358210.1063/1.93582 ↗
25. 10.1126/sciadv.abl926410.1126/sciadv.abl9264 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.0c2222410.1021/acsami.0c22224 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.349142910.1063/1.3491429 ↗
28. 10.1002/aenm.20190026610.1002/aenm.201900266 ↗
29. 10.1039/c3ee24455e10.1039/c3ee24455e ↗
30. 10.1021/ma102841e10.1021/ma102841e ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.19740110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.197401 ↗
32. 10.1021/jz201325g10.1021/jz201325g ↗
33. 10.1038/nature0194910.1038/nature01949 ↗
34. 10.1002/adfm.20170017310.1002/adfm.201700173 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.06402210.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.064022 ↗
36. 10.1002/adfm.20150409610.1002/adfm.201504096 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.23530210.1103/PhysRevB.85.235302 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.12531010.1103/PhysRevB.83.125310 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.08530110.1103/PhysRevB.95.085301 ↗
40. 10.1039/D2TC01115H10.1039/D2TC01115H ↗