Extreme γ‐Ray Radiation Tolerance of Spectrometer‐Grade CsPbBr3 Perovskite Detectors
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The perovskite compound CsPbBr3 has recently been discovered as a promising room‐temperature semiconductor radiation detector, offering an inexpensive and easy‐to‐manufacture alternative to the current benchmark material Cd1−xZnxTe (CZT). The performance of CsPbBr3 sensors is evaluated under harsh conditions, such as high radiation doses often found in industrial settings and extreme radiation in space. Results show minimal degradation in detector performance after exposure to 1 Mrad of Co‐60 gamma radiation, with no significant change to energy resolution or hole mobility and lifetime. Additionally, many of the devices are still functional after being exposed to a 10 Mrad dose over 3 days, and those that do not survive can still be refabricated into working detectors. These results suggest that the failure mode in these devices is likely related to the interface between the electrode and material and their reaction, or the electrode itself and not the material itself. Overall, the study suggests that CsPbBr3 has high potential as a reliable and efficient radiation detector in various applications, including those involving extreme fluxes and energies of gamma‐ray radiation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography · Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry Northwestern University Evanston IL 60208 USA
Department of Chemistry University of Georgia Athens GA 30602 USA
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Penn State University University Park PA 16802 USA
Applied Research Laboratory University Park PA 16802 USA
Materials Science Division Argonne National Laboratory Lemont IL 60439 USA
Funding
Defense Threat Reduction Agency · Argonne National Laboratory
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.nima.2019.01.00810.1016/j.nima.2019.01.008 ↗
2. 10.1021/cg400645t10.1021/cg400645t ↗
3. c)L.Tao Y. H.He M. G.Kanatzidis C. S.Levin Ieee i. presented atIEEE Nuclear Science Symp./Medical Imaging Conf. (NSS/MIC) Manchester England2019;
4. Zhang H. J. · J Mater Chem · 2020 · 8 · 1248
5. 10.1109/TMI.2022.317680110.1109/TMI.2022.3176801 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467-019-08981-w10.1038/s41467-019-08981-w ↗
7. Feng Y. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2020 · 8
8. 10.1038/s41467-018-04073-310.1038/s41467-018-04073-3 ↗
9. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.13910.1038/nphoton.2016.139 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0429810.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04298 ↗
11. 10.1002/adfm.20211292510.1002/adfm.202112925 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0168-9002(98)01585-X10.1016/S0168-9002(98)01585-X ↗
13. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.03.00410.1016/j.joule.2022.03.004 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41566-022-01103-x10.1038/s41566-022-01103-x ↗
15. 10.1063/1.5228210.1063/1.52282 ↗
16. a)B. L.Doyle United States 2014 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1177090;
17. 10.1109/TNS.1987.433752610.1109/TNS.1987.4337526 ↗
18. 10.1109/23.34052810.1109/23.340528 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0266510.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02665 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20170290510.1002/adma.201702905 ↗
21. 10.1039/D0TC05148A10.1039/D0TC05148A ↗
22. 10.1016/j.isci.2018.03.02010.1016/j.isci.2018.03.020 ↗
23. 10.1039/C9SE00102F10.1039/C9SE00102F ↗
24. 10.1039/C9EE00077A10.1039/C9EE00077A ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20180554710.1002/adma.201805547 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0322210.1021/acs.jpclett.8b03222 ↗
27. 10.1002/adom.20210206910.1002/adom.202102069 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20170627310.1002/adma.201706273 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0040410.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00404 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.2c0847110.1021/acsami.2c08471 ↗
31. a)Y.Chen M. R.Carver S. K.Morley A. S.Hoover presented at2021 IEEE Aerospace Conf. (50100) 2021 pp.1–21;10.1109/AERO50100.2021.9438516 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.microrel.2022.11474710.1016/j.microrel.2022.114747 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41566-020-00727-110.1038/s41566-020-00727-1 ↗