journal article·2023-04Open access

Strongly Correlated Exciton‐Magnetization System for Optical Spin Pumping in CrBr3 and CrI3.

M. Grzeszczyk, S. Acharya, D. Pashov, Z. Chen, K. Vaklinova, M. van Schilfgaarde, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. S. Novoselov, M. I. Katsnelson, M. Koperski

Advanced Materials· Volume 35· Issue 17

Abstract

Abstract Ferromagnetism in van der Waals systems, preserved down to a monolayer limit, attracted attention to a class of materials with general composition CrX3 (X=I, Br, and Cl), which are treated now as canonical 2D ferromagnets. Their diverse magnetic properties, such as different easy axes or varying and controllable character of in‐plane or interlayer ferromagnetic coupling, make them promising candidates for spintronic, photonic, optoelectronic, and other applications. Still, significantly different magneto‐optical properties between the three materials have been presenting a challenging puzzle for researchers over the last few years. Herewith, it is demonstrated that despite similar structural and magnetic configurations, the coupling between excitons and magnetization is qualitatively different in CrBr3 and CrI3 films. Through a combination of the optical spin pumping experiments with the state‐of‐the‐art theory describing bound excitonic states in the presence of magnetization, we concluded that the hole‐magnetization coupling has the opposite sign in CrBr3 and CrI3 and also between the ground and excited exciton state. Consequently, efficient spin pumping capabilities are demonstrated in CrBr3 driven by magnetization via spin‐dependent absorption, and the different origins of the magnetic hysteresis in CrBr3 and CrI3 are unraveled.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Perovskite Materials and Applications · Multiferroics and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for Functional Intelligent Materials National University of Singapore Singapore 117544 Singapore

Institute for Molecules and Materials Radboud University AJ Nijmegen NL‐6525 The Netherlands

National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden CO 80401 USA

King's College London Theory and Simulation of Condensed Matter The Strand London WC2R 2LS UK

Research Center for Functional Materials National Institute for Materials Science Tsukuba 305‐0044 Japan

International Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics National Institute for Materials Science Tsukuba 305‐0044 Japan

Department of Materials Science and Engineering National University of Singapore Singapore 117575 Singapore

Funding

H2020 European Research Council · Narodowym Centrum Nauki

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature2239110.1038/nature22391 ↗
2. 10.1038/nature2206010.1038/nature22060 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41699-017-0006-610.1038/s41699-017-0006-6 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41565-018-0063-910.1038/s41565-018-0063-9 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0068310.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00683 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41563-018-0149-710.1038/s41563-018-0149-7 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.113662910.1126/science.1136629 ↗
8. 10.1038/nnano.2008.40610.1038/nnano.2008.406 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat317110.1038/nmat3171 ↗
10. 10.1038/nnano.2015.2210.1038/nnano.2015.22 ↗
11. 10.1126/sciadv.160311310.1126/sciadv.1603113 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41586-018-0626-910.1038/s41586-018-0626-9 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41565-018-0121-310.1038/s41565-018-0121-3 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41565-018-0135-x10.1038/s41565-018-0135-x ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0127810.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01278 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.aar485110.1126/science.aar4851 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41563-018-0040-610.1038/s41563-018-0040-6 ↗
18. 10.1038/s42254-019-0110-y10.1038/s42254-019-0110-y ↗
19. 10.1038/s41928-019-0232-310.1038/s41928-019-0232-3 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0416010.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04160 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41586-018-0631-z10.1038/s41586-018-0631-z ↗
22. 10.1038/s41565-019-0438-610.1038/s41565-019-0438-6 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0915010.1021/acsnano.1c09150 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-1-4899-6391-8_6410.1007/978-1-4899-6391-8_64 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.172932110.1063/1.1729321 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.171419410.1063/1.1714194 ↗
27. P.Grant G.Street inBulletin of the American Physical Society Amer. Inst. Physics1968 13 415.
28. 10.1002/pssb.1970041022410.1002/pssb.19700410224 ↗
29. 10.1016/0022-3697(79)90030-110.1016/0022-3697(79)90030-1 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.29.360710.1103/PhysRevB.29.3607 ↗
31. 10.1088/0953-8984/23/11/11600310.1088/0953-8984/23/11/116003 ↗
32. 10.1088/2053-1583/aa75ed10.1088/2053-1583/aa75ed ↗
33. 10.3390/cryst705012110.3390/cryst7050121 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.01400110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.014001 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0155210.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01552 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w ↗
37. 10.1038/s41928-018-0087-z10.1038/s41928-018-0087-z ↗
38. 10.1126/science.aar361710.1126/science.aar3617 ↗
39. 10.1126/science.aav692610.1126/science.aav6926 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0131710.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01317 ↗
41. 10.1038/s41567-017-0006-710.1038/s41567-017-0006-7 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.26720310.1103/PhysRevLett.117.267203 ↗
43. 10.1002/aelm.20210003010.1002/aelm.202100030 ↗
44. 10.1002/adom.20210271110.1002/adom.202102711 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.03510310.1103/PhysRevB.106.035103 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.22640210.1103/PhysRevLett.96.226402 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.10706510.1016/j.cpc.2019.107065 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.03460310.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.034603 ↗
49. 10.1140/epje/i2012-12026-910.1140/epje/i2012-12026-9 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.05441010.1103/PhysRevB.93.054410 ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0428210.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04282 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.15510910.1103/PhysRevB.104.155109 ↗
53. 10.1038/s41699-022-00307-710.1038/s41699-022-00307-7 ↗
54. 10.1021/jacs.1c0890610.1021/jacs.1c08906 ↗
55. In our experiments we observe the narrow excitonic resonance only for thick CrBr3samples that have been well preserved from degradation processes [54]as can be seen from the structural characterization of studied flakes presented in Appendix Section S2 (Supporting Information). Theoretically the intensity of this line should be stronger for CrI3due to enhanced admixtures of thep‐states. However the energy of CrI3emission is located at the edge of sensitivity curves for Si CCD detectors and InGaAs detectors are characterized by significantly larger thermal noise effectively preventing the observation of weak narrow resonances located on a slope of significantly stronger phonon sideband.
56. The Debye–Waller factor constitutes the ratio of the ZPL intensity with respect to the total emission intensity (ZPL with phonon sideband). The Huang–Rhys factor was calculated from a phenomenological model that yieldsS = −ln (w).
57. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0332110.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03321 ↗
58. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.03100110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.031001 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.14440110.1103/PhysRevB.99.144401 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.ssc.2019.11366210.1016/j.ssc.2019.113662 ↗
61. 10.1038/s41565-021-01014-y10.1038/s41565-021-01014-y ↗
62. 10.1038/s41467-018-07882-810.1038/s41467-018-07882-8 ↗
63. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.01400810.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.014008 ↗
64. 10.1038/s41524-021-00676-510.1038/s41524-021-00676-5 ↗