Tuning Organic Electrochemical Transistor Threshold Voltage using Chemically Doped Polymer Gates
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs) have shown promise as transducers and amplifiers of minute electronic potentials due to their large transconductances. Tuning the OECT threshold voltage is important to achieve low‐powered devices with amplification properties within the desired operational voltage range. However, traditional design approaches have struggled to decouple channel and materials properties from threshold voltage, thereby compromising on several other OECT performance metrics, such as electrochemical stability, transconductance, and dynamic range. In this work, simple solution‐processing methods are utilized to chemically dope polymer gate electrodes, thereby controlling their work function, which in turn tunes the operation voltage range of the OECTs without perturbing their channel properties. Chemical doping of initially air‐sensitive polymer electrodes further improves their electrochemical stability in ambient conditions. Thus, OECTs that are simultaneously low‐powered and electrochemically resistant to oxidative side reactions under ambient conditions are demonstrated. This approach shows that threshold voltage, which is once interwoven with other OECT properties, can in fact be an independent design parameter, expanding the design space of OECTs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Stanford University California CA 94305 USA
Department of Chemistry Chemistry Research Laboratory University of Oxford Oxford OX1 3TA UK
Funding
National Science Foundation · U.S. Department of Energy · King Abdullah University of Science and Technology · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.8610.1038/natrevmats.2017.86 ↗
2. 10.1038/ncomms257310.1038/ncomms2573 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-018-03932-310.1038/s41467-018-03932-3 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41563-019-0435-z10.1038/s41563-019-0435-z ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20200274810.1002/adma.202002748 ↗
6. 10.1073/pnas.160878011310.1073/pnas.1608780113 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20201086810.1002/adfm.202010868 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.09.01010.1016/j.orgel.2018.09.010 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20060123910.1002/adfm.200601239 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms1306610.1038/ncomms13066 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20130308010.1002/adma.201303080 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20190804710.1002/adma.201908047 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20201004810.1002/adfm.202010048 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20200027010.1002/adma.202000270 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.1c1300910.1021/acsami.1c13009 ↗
16. 10.1039/D1TC02224E10.1039/D1TC02224E ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20170675710.1002/adma.201706757 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.7b0938410.1021/acsami.7b09384 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10611610.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106116 ↗
20. 10.1002/admt.20210059110.1002/admt.202100591 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0331910.1021/acsomega.8b03319 ↗
22. 10.1021/ac503914x10.1021/ac503914x ↗
23. 10.3390/s10030167910.3390/s100301679 ↗
24. 10.1039/C8EE03518K10.1039/C8EE03518K ↗
25. 10.1038/s41563-018-0263-610.1038/s41563-018-0263-6 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20170093010.1002/adma.201700930 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20170306310.1002/adma.201703063 ↗
28. 10.1002/cphc.20160096110.1002/cphc.201600961 ↗
29. 10.1002/smll.20210321310.1002/smll.202103213 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0506910.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05069 ↗
31. 10.1126/sciadv.170043410.1126/sciadv.1700434 ↗
32. 10.1002/adfm.20170265410.1002/adfm.201702654 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0006710.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00067 ↗
34. 10.1107/S002188981200403710.1107/S0021889812004037 ↗