journal article·2019-07

The Role of Bulk and Interface Recombination in High‐Efficiency Low‐Dimensional Perovskite Solar Cells

Shanshan Zhang, Seyed M. Hosseini, René Gunder, Andrei Petsiuk, Pietro Caprioglio, Christian M. Wolff, Safa Shoaee, Paul Meredith, Susan Schorr, Thomas Unold, Paul L. Burn, Dieter Neher, Martin Stolterfoht

Advanced Materials· Volume 31· Issue 30
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract 2D Ruddlesden–Popper perovskite (RPP) solar cells have excellent environmental stability. However, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of RPP cells remains inferior to 3D perovskite‐based cells. Herein, 2D (CH3(CH2)3NH3)2(CH3NH3)n−1PbnI3n+1 perovskite cells with different numbers of [PbI6]4− sheets (n = 2–4) are analyzed. Photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) measurements show that nonradiative open‐circuit voltage (VOC) losses outweigh radiative losses in materials with n > 2. The n = 3 and n = 4 films exhibit a higher PLQY than the standard 3D methylammonium lead iodide perovskite although this is accompanied by increased interfacial recombination at the top perovskite/C60 interface. This tradeoff results in a similar PLQY in all devices, including the n = 2 system where the perovskite bulk dominates the recombination properties of the cell. In most cases the quasi‐Fermi level splitting matches the device VOC within 20 meV, which indicates minimal recombination losses at the metal contacts. The results show that poor charge transport rather than exciton dissociation is the primary reason for the reduction in fill factor of the RPP devices. Optimized n = 4 RPP solar cells had PCEs of 13% with significant potential for further improvements.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · 2D Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Physics and Astronomy University of Potsdam Karl‐Liebknecht‐Str. 24‐25 D‐14476 Potsdam‐Golm Germany

Centre for Organic Photonics and Electronics (COPE) School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences The University of Queensland Brisbane 4072 Australia

Department of Structure and Dynamics of Energy Materials Helmholtz‐Zentrum‐Berlin Hahn‐Meitner‐Platz 1 D‐14109 Berlin Germany

Young Investigator Group Perovskite Tandem Solar Cells Helmholtz‐Zentrum Berlin Kekuléstr. 5 12489 Berlin Germany

Department of Physics Swansea University Singleton Park Swansea SA2 8PP Wales UK

Funding

China Scholarship Council · Australian Renewable Energy Agency · Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. NREL Best Research‐Cell Efficiencies https://www.nrel.gov/pv/assets/pdfs/pv‐efficiency‐chart.20190103.pdf(accessed: January 2019).
2. 10.1038/s41566-018-0154-z10.1038/s41566-018-0154-z ↗
3. Fu Q. · Adv. Sci. · 2018 · 5 · 1
4. 10.1016/j.jssc.2008.01.04210.1016/j.jssc.2008.01.042 ↗
5. 10.1107/S0365110X5700192910.1107/S0365110X57001929 ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20140646610.1002/anie.201406466 ↗
7. 10.1038/nature1830610.1038/nature18306 ↗
8. 10.1039/C7EE01145H10.1039/C7EE01145H ↗
9. 10.1021/jacs.8b0460410.1021/jacs.8b04604 ↗
10. 10.1002/aenm.20170103810.1002/aenm.201701038 ↗
11. 10.1039/C6NR04741F10.1039/C6NR04741F ↗
12. 10.1039/C7EE03513F10.1039/C7EE03513F ↗
13. 10.1038/ncomms1568410.1038/ncomms15684 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0298510.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02985 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20160289710.1002/adma.201602897 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.502083610.1063/1.5020836 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0564910.1021/acsnano.6b05649 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-018-02978-710.1038/s41467-018-02978-7 ↗
19. 10.1364/OE.26.000A6610.1364/OE.26.000A66 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0268310.1021/acsnano.6b02683 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20160136910.1002/adma.201601369 ↗
22. 10.1039/C8TA01518J10.1039/C8TA01518J ↗
23. 10.1021/jacs.6b1258110.1021/jacs.6b12581 ↗
24. 10.1126/science.aal421110.1126/science.aal4211 ↗
25. 10.1038/ncomms1455810.1038/ncomms14558 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0311410.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03114 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0014810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00148 ↗
28. 10.1021/jacs.5b1174010.1021/jacs.5b11740 ↗
29. 10.1039/C7EE00899F10.1039/C7EE00899F ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20170130510.1002/aenm.201701305 ↗
31. 10.1002/cssc.20170102610.1002/cssc.201701026 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w ↗
33. 10.1038/s41467-018-03757-010.1038/s41467-018-03757-0 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0124510.1021/acsenergylett.7b01245 ↗
35. 10.1038/ncomms1194410.1038/ncomms11944 ↗
36. 10.1002/aenm.20160137910.1002/aenm.201601379 ↗
37. 10.1021/jz300084910.1021/jz3000849 ↗
38. 10.1021/jacs.5b0379610.1021/jacs.5b03796 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.7.04401610.1103/PhysRevApplied.7.044016 ↗
40. 10.1002/aenm.20170338510.1002/aenm.201703385 ↗
41. 10.1002/aenm.20160235810.1002/aenm.201602358 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.02.00410.1016/j.chempr.2017.02.004 ↗
43. 10.1021/ja512833n10.1021/ja512833n ↗
44. 10.1039/C8TA05475D10.1039/C8TA05475D ↗
45. 10.1038/s41467-018-04659-x10.1038/s41467-018-04659-x ↗
46. 10.1063/1.488984310.1063/1.4889843 ↗
47. 10.1039/c4ee00168k10.1039/c4ee00168k ↗
48. M.Stolterfoht P.Caprioglio C. M.Wolff J. A.Márquez J.Nordmann S.Zhang D.Rothhart U.Hörmann A.Redinger L.Kegelmann S.Albrecht T.Kirchartz M.Saliba T.Unold D.Neher2019 http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.01333.
49. J.Rodríguez‐Carvajal 2014 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267375610(accessed: May 2019).
50. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0084710.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00847 ↗
51. 10.1021/jacs.7b1115710.1021/jacs.7b11157 ↗
52. 10.1038/s41560-018-0219-810.1038/s41560-018-0219-8 ↗
53. 10.1038/srep4462910.1038/srep44629 ↗
54. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b1072810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10728 ↗
55. 10.1039/C6EE00462H10.1039/C6EE00462H ↗
56. 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.06110.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.061 ↗
57. 10.1063/1.173603410.1063/1.1736034 ↗
58. 10.1002/pssa.20088045810.1002/pssa.200880458 ↗
59. 10.1038/srep0994910.1038/srep09949 ↗
60. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0210610.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02106 ↗
61. 10.1021/acsami.8b0250310.1021/acsami.8b02503 ↗