journal article·2019-12

SnSe/MoS2 van der Waals Heterostructure Junction Field‐Effect Transistors with Nearly Ideal Subthreshold Slope

Jian Guo, Laiyuan Wang, Yiwei Yu, Peiqi Wang, Yu Huang, Xiangfeng Duan

Advanced Materials· Volume 31· Issue 49
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The minimization of the subthreshold swing (SS) in transistors is essential for low‐voltage operation and lower power consumption, both critical for mobile devices and internet of things (IoT) devices. The conventional metal‐oxide‐semiconductor field‐effect transistor requires sophisticated dielectric engineering to achieve nearly ideal SS (60 mV dec−1 at room temperature). However, another type of transistor, the junction field‐effect transistor (JFET) is free of dielectric layer and can reach the theoretical SS limit without complicated dielectric engineering. The construction of a 2D SnSe/MoS2 van der Waals (vdW) heterostructure‐based JFET with nearly ideal SS is reported. It is shown that the SnSe/MoS2 vdW heterostructure exhibits excellent p–n diode rectifying characteristics with low saturate current. Using the SnSe as the gate and MoS2 as the channel, the SnSe/MoS2 vdW heterostructure exhibit well‐behavioured n‐channel JFET characteristics with a small pinch‐off voltage VP of −0.25 V, nearly ideal subthreshold swing SS of 60.3 mV dec−1 and high ON/OFF ratio over 106, demonstrating excellent electronic performance especially in the subthreshold regime.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of California Los Angeles CA 90095 USA

Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of California Los Angeles CA 90095 USA

Funding

Office of Naval Research · National Science Foundation

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TED.2007.91133810.1109/TED.2007.911338 ↗
2. Carter R. · 2016 · 2.2.110.1109/IEDM.2016.7838029 ↗
3. 10.3390/jlpea602001010.3390/jlpea6020010 ↗
4. Kang L. · 2000 · 3510.1109/IEDM.2000.904253 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mee.2009.03.04510.1016/j.mee.2009.03.045 ↗
6. 10.1109/LED.2013.229156010.1109/LED.2013.2291560 ↗
7. Krivokapic Z. · 2017 · 15.11.11
8. Yeung C. W. · 2013 · 1
9. 10.1038/s41565-017-0010-110.1038/s41565-017-0010-1 ↗
10. Jing K. H. · 2016 · 020073
11. 10.1109/TED.2018.283097210.1109/TED.2018.2830972 ↗
12. 10.1109/TED.2010.205119310.1109/TED.2010.2051193 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0072710.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00727 ↗
14. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.5210.1038/natrevmats.2016.52 ↗
15. 10.1039/C8CS00318A10.1039/C8CS00318A ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0081610.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00816 ↗
17. Yu Z. · 2018 · 22.24.21
18. 10.1038/natrevmats.2018.1910.1038/natrevmats.2018.19 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.13680510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136805 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.aaw805310.1126/science.aaw8053 ↗
21. 10.1007/s12274-018-2246-y10.1007/s12274-018-2246-y ↗
22. Kumar M. · Int. J. Emerging Technol. Adv. Eng. · 2013 · 3 · 292
23. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0278510.1021/acsnano.5b02785 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.8b0703010.1021/acsami.8b07030 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0466410.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04664 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41699-018-0082-210.1038/s41699-018-0082-2 ↗
27. 10.1039/C7NR01952A10.1039/C7NR01952A ↗
28. 10.1038/s41598-017-04925-w10.1038/s41598-017-04925-w ↗
29. 10.1039/C7RA03367B10.1039/C7RA03367B ↗
30. 10.1021/nl504311p10.1021/nl504311p ↗
31. 10.1021/nl501659n10.1021/nl501659n ↗
32. 10.1088/2053-1583/aae6a110.1088/2053-1583/aae6a1 ↗
33. 10.1002/pssr.20130701510.1002/pssr.201307015 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20170593410.1002/adma.201705934 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.370359510.1063/1.3703595 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.502710210.1063/1.5027102 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41598-017-04350-z10.1038/s41598-017-04350-z ↗