Updated Assessment of Possibilities and Limits for Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
The remarkable advances over the past few years in performance of photovoltaic cells, including the advent of new absorber materials, call for an update to the previous assessment of prospects for future progress. The same simple criteria with some refinements, based on cell and module performance data, serve to evaluate and compare most types of solar cells. Apart from Si and InP, for all types the “best cells” have improved in conversion performances (and crystalline Si modules have made major strides in cost reduction). New cell types, such as “perovskite”, sustainable chalcogenide, and quantum dot cells, are included. CdTe results bring those cells in line with other well‐developed ones, lending some credence to the idea that the criteria provide the reader with knowledge, useful for gauging possible future technological developments. Additionally, the developments of the past few years show that, while the advent of more new cell types cannot be predicted, it can be aided and stimulated by innovative, daring, and creative new materials research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Perovskite Materials and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dept. of Materials and Interfaces Weizmann Inst. of Science Rehovot 76100 Israel
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.173603410.1063/1.1736034 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.08.00610.1016/j.solmat.2008.08.006 ↗
3. Guillemoles J. F. · 2012
4. 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.03.09410.1016/j.cplett.2008.03.094 ↗
5. Yablonovitch E. · 2010 · SWA1
6. 10.1002/adma.20110087710.1002/adma.201100877 ↗
7. 10.1039/c2ee03178g10.1039/c2ee03178g ↗
8. NOTE: Still these numbers hide the amazing decrease in actual cost of multi/polycrystalline Si modules; cf. http://m.technologyreview.com/news/516306/what‐tech‐is‐next‐for‐the‐solar‐industry(accessed on Nov. 2013)
9. NREL Best Research‐Cell Efficiencies www.nrel.gov/ncpv/images/efficiency_chart.jpg(accessed on Nov. 2013).
10. Street R. A. · 2005
11. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.6910.1038/nphoton.2009.69 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.121774510.1126/science.1217745 ↗
13. 10.1021/ja308177d10.1021/ja308177d ↗
14. 10.1021/jz400233910.1021/jz4002339 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.120968810.1126/science.1209688 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20120003110.1002/adfm.201200031 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.20530710.1103/PhysRevB.81.205307 ↗
18. 10.1021/ja207367t10.1021/ja207367t ↗
19. 10.1002/cssc.20110012010.1002/cssc.201100120 ↗
20. 10.1021/ic401215x10.1021/ic401215x ↗
21. Mitzi D. B. · 2007 · 1
22. 10.1126/science.124398210.1126/science.1243982 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.124316710.1126/science.1243167 ↗
24. E.Edri S.Kirmayer S.Mukhopadhyay K.Gartsman G.Hodes D.Cahen Fall Meeting Materials Research Society2013 Abstract Y‐RS‐10 http://www.mrs.org/fall‐2013‐rump‐session/(Accessed: November 2013).
25. 10.1002/pip.102410.1002/pip.1024 ↗
26. 10.1088/1464-4258/10/01/01500810.1088/1464-4258/10/01/015008 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.184060610.1063/1.1840606 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.08530310.1103/PhysRevB.76.085303 ↗
29. 10.1002/pip.89510.1002/pip.895 ↗
30. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2012.219843410.1109/JPHOTOV.2012.2198434 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.338652910.1063/1.3386529 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.10934810.1063/1.109348 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.36571710.1063/1.365717 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.157247310.1063/1.1572473 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11120-009-9465-810.1007/s11120-009-9465-8 ↗
36. 10.1016/0379-6787(82)90057-610.1016/0379-6787(82)90057-6 ↗
37. From ref. 36 we find thatVMP′ =VOC′ ‐ In(VMP′ + 1) [i] whereVMP′=VMP/nkTandVOC′ =VOC/nkT. Eqn. [i] can be written asVMP′ =VOC′ ‐ In(VOC′+ 1 ‐ In(VMP′ + 1)) [ii]. As the logarithm weakly depends on its argument andVOC≈VMP VMP′ can be substituted withV∝in the right‐hand side of eqn. [ii] which yieldsVMP′ ≈VOC′‐In(VOC′ + 1 – In(VOC′ + 1)) [iii].VOCfor a givenEGis calculated from eqns. 1 and 2 (in the main text) andVMP′ is computed asVMP=VMP′·nkT. The overpotential for an ideal cell (n= 1) is calculated asEG–qVMP.
38. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2012.218426610.1109/JPHOTOV.2012.2184266 ↗
39. 10.1039/c3ee41781f10.1039/c3ee41781f ↗
40. 10.1002/aenm.20120034810.1002/aenm.201200348 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.solmat.2012.01.00810.1016/j.solmat.2012.01.008 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.352288410.1063/1.3522884 ↗
43. 10.1038/nature1234010.1038/nature12340 ↗
44. 10.1038/nature1250910.1038/nature12509 ↗
45. 10.1021/jz400348q10.1021/jz400348q ↗
46. 10.1002/adma.20130194710.1002/adma.201301947 ↗
47. 10.1038/nnano.2012.12710.1038/nnano.2012.127 ↗
48. 10.1021/jz201265z10.1021/jz201265z ↗
49. Poly[2 6‐(4 4‐bis‐(2‐ethylhexyl)‐4H‐cyclopenta[2 1‐b;3 4‐b]dithiophene)‐alt‐4 7(2 1 3‐benzo‐thiadiazole)]
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.11532710.1103/PhysRevB.75.115327 ↗
51. 10.1016/S1386-9477(02)00354-510.1016/S1386-9477(02)00354-5 ↗
52. 10.1002/pip.240410.1002/pip.2404 ↗
53. 10.1021/nl204224v10.1021/nl204224v ↗