Interface Reconstruction from Ruddlesden–Popper Structures Impacts Stability in Lead Halide Perovskite Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The impact of the bulky‐cation‐modified interfaces on halide perovskite solar cell stability is underexplored. In this work, the thermal instability of the bulky‐cation interface layers used in the state‐of‐the‐art solar cells is demonstrated. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy and synchrotron‐based grazing‐incidence X‐ray scattering measurements reveal significant changes in the chemical composition and structure at the surface of these films that occur under thermal stress. The changes impact charge‐carrier dynamics and device operation, as shown in transient photoluminescence, excitation correlation spectroscopy, and solar cells. The type of cation used for surface treatment affects the extent of these changes, where long carbon chains provide more stable interfaces. These results highlight that prolonged annealing of the treated interfaces is critical to enable reliable reporting of performances and to drive the selection of different bulky cations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332 USA
School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332 USA
Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory 9700 Cass Avenue Lemont IL 60439 USA
National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS‐II) Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton NY 11973 USA
School of Physics Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332 USA
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy · National Science Foundation
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.03.01110.1016/j.joule.2021.03.011 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0127110.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01271 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41566-021-00829-410.1038/s41566-021-00829-4 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.1c0969510.1021/acsami.1c09695 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41566-019-0462-y10.1038/s41566-019-0462-y ↗
6. 10.1038/s41586-021-03285-w10.1038/s41586-021-03285-w ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20200195910.1002/aenm.202001959 ↗
8. 10.1039/D0EE01767A10.1039/D0EE01767A ↗
9. 10.1002/aenm.20190274010.1002/aenm.201902740 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.08.01610.1016/j.joule.2020.08.016 ↗
11. 10.1002/aenm.20180259510.1002/aenm.201802595 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0012610.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00126 ↗
13. 10.1021/jacs.6b0632010.1021/jacs.6b06320 ↗
14. 10.1039/D0MA00967A10.1039/D0MA00967A ↗
15. 10.3389/fchem.2020.0006610.3389/fchem.2020.00066 ↗
16. 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00025-U10.1016/0016-7037(95)00025-U ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20190775710.1002/adma.201907757 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0172010.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01720 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0147510.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01475 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0222410.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02224 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41467-018-07440-210.1038/s41467-018-07440-2 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0080910.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00809 ↗
23. 10.1007/s12274-016-1401-610.1007/s12274-016-1401-6 ↗
24. 10.1039/C0DT01805H10.1039/C0DT01805H ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2019.11698110.1016/j.jlumin.2019.116981 ↗
26. 10.1021/jacs.6b0646310.1021/jacs.6b06463 ↗
27. 10.1039/D1TC01492G10.1039/D1TC01492G ↗
28. 10.1038/nmat391110.1038/nmat3911 ↗
29. 10.1021/jacs.9b1341810.1021/jacs.9b13418 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0084010.1021/acsenergylett.9b00840 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41566-019-0435-110.1038/s41566-019-0435-1 ↗
32. 10.1039/D1EE02055B10.1039/D1EE02055B ↗