journal article·2011-12-22Open access

Practical Roadmap and Limits to Nanostructured Photovoltaics

Richard R. Lunt, Timothy P. Osedach, Patrick R. Brown, Jill A. Rowehl, Vladimir Bulović

Advanced Materials· Volume 23· Issue 48

Abstract

Abstract The significant research interest in the engineering of photovoltaic (PV) structures at the nanoscale is directed toward enabling reductions in PV module fabrication and installation costs as well as improving cell power conversion efficiency (PCE). With the emergence of a multitude of nanostructured photovoltaic (nano‐PV) device architectures, the question has arisen of where both the practical and the fundamental limits of performance reside in these new systems. Here, the former is addressed a posteriori. The specific challenges associated with improving the electrical power conversion efficiency of various nano‐PV technologies are discussed and several approaches to reduce their thermal losses beyond the single bandgap limit are reviewed. Critical considerations related to the module lifetime and cost that are unique to nano‐PV architectures are also addressed. The analysis suggests that a practical single‐junction laboratory power conversion efficiency limit of 17% and a two‐cell tandem power conversion efficiency limit of 24% are possible for nano‐PVs, which, when combined with operating lifetimes of 10 to 15 years, could position them as a transformational technology for solar energy markets.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · solar cell performance optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.107235710.1126/science.1072357 ↗
2. 10.1002/pip.108810.1002/pip.1088 ↗
3. 10.1557/mrs2005.510.1557/mrs2005.5 ↗
4. 10.1002/1616-3028(200102)11:1<15::AID-ADFM15>3.0.CO;2-A10.1002/1616-3028(200102)11:1<15::AID-ADFM15>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
5. 10.1002/pip.36010.1002/pip.360 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.235679510.1063/1.2356795 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.173603410.1063/1.1736034 ↗
8. 10.1109/T-ED.1984.2158810.1109/T-ED.1984.21588 ↗
9. 10.1109/T-ED.1984.2159410.1109/T-ED.1984.21594 ↗
10. 10.1002/pip.108810.1002/pip.1088 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.32827210.1063/1.328272 ↗
12. Optical gap edge is estimated from published EQE data to be the edge of useful photocurrent.
13. 10.1002/047001400810.1002/0470014008 ↗
14. 10.1021/ja900772210.1021/ja9007722 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.19532610.1103/PhysRevB.83.195326 ↗
16. Pope M. · 1982
17. 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.09.03010.1016/j.cplett.2004.09.030 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.153462110.1063/1.1534621 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.9693710.1063/1.96937 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.33195510.1063/1.331955 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.214207310.1063/1.2142073 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0379-6779(02)00398-310.1016/S0379-6779(02)00398-3 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20090282710.1002/adma.200902827 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.307979710.1063/1.3079797 ↗
25. 10.1038/nmat287210.1038/nmat2872 ↗
26. Rim S. B. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91
27. 10.1002/1616-3028(200110)11:5<374::AID-ADFM374>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/1616-3028(200110)11:5<374::AID-ADFM374>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.11532710.1103/PhysRevB.75.115327 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.356697910.1063/1.3566979 ↗
30. 10.1039/b913769f10.1039/b913769f ↗
31. 10.1063/1.273819710.1063/1.2738197 ↗
32. 10.1021/ol102072410.1021/ol1020724 ↗
33. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.19210.1038/nphoton.2009.192 ↗
34. 10.1002/pip.102110.1002/pip.1021 ↗
35. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.6910.1038/nphoton.2009.69 ↗
36. Uhrich C. L. · Org. Photonics IV · 2010 · 7722 · 323
37. 10.1002/adma.20110079210.1002/adma.201100792 ↗
38. 10.1021/nl901637u10.1021/nl901637u ↗
39. 10.1021/nl103134310.1021/nl1031343 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.346416910.1063/1.3464169 ↗
41. 10.1126/science.114171110.1126/science.1141711 ↗
42. 10.1038/353737a010.1038/353737a0 ↗
43. 10.1021/ja900268410.1021/ja9002684 ↗
44. 10.1021/ja003299u10.1021/ja003299u ↗
45. 10.1039/B814863P10.1039/B814863P ↗
46. 10.1021/cr900356p10.1021/cr900356p ↗
47. 10.1016/j.nantod.2010.04.00110.1016/j.nantod.2010.04.001 ↗
48. 10.1002/adfm.20090239610.1002/adfm.200902396 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.279925710.1063/1.2799257 ↗
50. 10.1002/adma.20100471510.1002/adma.201004715 ↗
51. 10.1021/jz100308q10.1021/jz100308q ↗
52. 10.1002/adma.20090416810.1002/adma.200904168 ↗
53. 10.1002/cphc.20100006910.1002/cphc.201000069 ↗
54. 10.1021/nl101322h10.1021/nl101322h ↗
55. 10.1021/jz100863b10.1021/jz100863b ↗
56. 10.1021/nn901564q10.1021/nn901564q ↗
57. 10.1002/adma.20100149110.1002/adma.201001491 ↗
58. 10.1007/978-3-642-18865-710.1007/978-3-642-18865-7 ↗
59. 10.1021/cr900289f10.1021/cr900289f ↗
60. Kalinowski J. · 2005
61. 10.1021/nl100498e10.1021/nl100498e ↗
62. 10.1063/1.351806710.1063/1.3518067 ↗
63. 10.1002/adma.20110178310.1002/adma.201101783 ↗
64. 10.1002/adma.20100114810.1002/adma.201001148 ↗
65. 10.1021/nn800471c10.1021/nn800471c ↗
66. 10.1021/nl101284k10.1021/nl101284k ↗
67. 10.1126/science.117052410.1126/science.1170524 ↗
68. 10.1021/nl802353x10.1021/nl802353x ↗
69. 10.1021/nn100129j10.1021/nn100129j ↗
70. 10.1063/1.33112410.1063/1.331124 ↗
71. 10.1021/nl062564s10.1021/nl062564s ↗
72. 10.1002/978352761854510.1002/9783527618545 ↗
73. 10.1126/science.115834210.1126/science.1158342 ↗
74. 10.1021/nl102122x10.1021/nl102122x ↗
75. 10.1063/1.32263510.1063/1.322635 ↗
76. 10.1021/nl052276g10.1021/nl052276g ↗
77. 10.1126/science.117381210.1126/science.1173812 ↗
78. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.10453710.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104537 ↗
79. 10.1021/nl072046x10.1021/nl072046x ↗
80. 10.1021/nl200798x10.1021/nl200798x ↗
81. 10.1021/nl100177c10.1021/nl100177c ↗
82. 10.1016/0009-2614(95)00603-210.1016/0009-2614(95)00603-2 ↗
83. 10.1080/1542140690808295310.1080/15421406908082953 ↗
84. 10.1063/1.169569510.1063/1.1695695 ↗
85. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.01740110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.017401 ↗
86. 10.1038/nchem.69410.1038/nchem.694 ↗
87. 10.1063/1.318278710.1063/1.3182787 ↗
88. 10.1021/ja104246210.1021/ja1042462 ↗
89. 10.1063/1.312056610.1063/1.3120566 ↗
90. 10.1021/nl104202j10.1021/nl104202j ↗
91. The doubling of the photocurrent has minimal impact onVOCthrough ln(2JSC/JS)/ln(JSC/JS) ≈1 forJsis the SQ limit.
92. 10.1021/ja063980h10.1021/ja063980h ↗
93. 10.1515/green.2011.00910.1515/green.2011.009 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.orgel.2008.03.00910.1016/j.orgel.2008.03.009 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.solmat.2007.12.00110.1016/j.solmat.2007.12.001 ↗
96. 10.1063/1.182977610.1063/1.1829776 ↗
97. 10.1515/GREEN.2011.00910.1515/GREEN.2011.009 ↗
98. 10.1016/S0927-0248(99)00019-710.1016/S0927-0248(99)00019-7 ↗
99. 2010
100. Technology Roadmap ‐ Solar Photovoltaic Energy International Energy Agency http://www.iea.org/papers/2010/pv_roadmap.pdf2010 (p. 1 paragraph 3) (accessed July 2011).