journal article·2024-11Open access

Minimizing perovskite solar cells' lead leakage with a cost‐effective and 160 days stable encapsulant

Haoxuan Liu, Can Li, Zongxu Zhang, Yating Shi, Fei Zhang

EcoMat· Volume 6· Issue 11

Abstract

Abstract Perovskite solar cells' (PSCs) potential lead leakage seriously threatens ecosystems and human health, significantly hindering their commercialization. In this paper, we develope a cost‐effective (less than 2$/m2) and long‐term stable SSP film by mixing sulfonated SiO2 with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). Combined with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) forming the encapsulation layer, it can effectively prevent over 99% of lead leakage under simulated adverse weather conditions with different structures of devices (p‐i‐n and n‐i‐p) and modules. Even after 160 days of air storage, the film maintains excellent lead sequestration efficiency. Additionally, it has no negative impact on the performance and stability. This work offers a practical and economical strategy to mitigate the toxicity of perovskite photovoltaic devices, thereby promoting their commercialization. image
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University Tianjin China

Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin) Tianjin China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ja809598r10.1021/ja809598r ↗
2. 10.1126/science.aaa927210.1126/science.aaa9272 ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20200361910.1002/adfm.202003619 ↗
4. 10.1039/D1TA04130D10.1039/D1TA04130D ↗
5. 10.1126/science.abj263710.1126/science.abj2637 ↗
6. 10.1039/D3MH01313H10.1039/D3MH01313H ↗
7. 10.1039/d3mh00219e10.1039/d3mh00219e ↗
8. 10.1039/D2MH00970F10.1039/D2MH00970F ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20231408910.1002/anie.202314089 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41586‐024‐07723‐310.1038/s41586‐024‐07723‐3 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41586‐019‐1357‐210.1038/s41586‐019‐1357‐2 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467‐019‐09167‐010.1038/s41467‐019‐09167‐0 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.aax329410.1126/science.aax3294 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.aba241210.1126/science.aba2412 ↗
15. 10.1021/jp512077m10.1021/jp512077m ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20180379210.1002/adma.201803792 ↗
17. Solar Risk Assessment kWh Analytics.https://docsend.com/view/hc2y3pbmxz9fn93k. Accessed August2024.
18. 10.1021/acsami.8b0049510.1021/acsami.8b00495 ↗
19. 10.1039/C8RA01150H10.1039/C8RA01150H ↗
20. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0188710.1021/acsenergylett.0c01887 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41560‐019‐0406‐210.1038/s41560‐019‐0406‐2 ↗
22. 10.1002/solr.20220112310.1002/solr.202201123 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41893‐023‐01120‐w10.1038/s41893‐023‐01120‐w ↗
24. 10.1038/s41560‐020‐00716‐210.1038/s41560‐020‐00716‐2 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41565‐020‐0765‐710.1038/s41565‐020‐0765‐7 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41893‐021‐00701‐x10.1038/s41893‐021‐00701‐x ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12816710.1016/j.cej.2020.128167 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20210646010.1002/adfm.202106460 ↗
29. 10.1002/adfm.20220103610.1002/adfm.202201036 ↗
30. 10.1002/adfm.20211013910.1002/adfm.202110139 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20221161910.1002/adma.202211619 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41893‐021‐00789‐110.1038/s41893‐021‐00789‐1 ↗
33. 10.1126/sciadv.abi824910.1126/sciadv.abi8249 ↗
34. 10.1002/aenm.20210323610.1002/aenm.202103236 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10685310.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106853 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.2c0507410.1021/acsami.2c05074 ↗
37. 10.1039/D2TC01696F10.1039/D2TC01696F ↗
38. 10.1002/eom2.1240010.1002/eom2.12400 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41467‐023‐36918‐x10.1038/s41467‐023‐36918‐x ↗
40. 10.1038/s41586‐020‐2001‐x10.1038/s41586‐020‐2001‐x ↗
41. 10.1007/s12517‐022‐11034‐010.1007/s12517‐022‐11034‐0 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.sab.2015.09.00310.1016/j.sab.2015.09.003 ↗
43. 10.1039/D0EW00334D10.1039/D0EW00334D ↗
44. 10.1016/j.matt.2022.02.01210.1016/j.matt.2022.02.012 ↗