Proteolysis and Contractility Regulate Tissue Opening and Wound Healing by Lung Fibroblasts in 3D Microenvironments
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Damage and repair are recurring processes in tissues, with fibroblasts playing key roles by remodeling extracellular matrices (ECM) through protein synthesis, proteolysis, and cell contractility. Dysregulation of fibroblasts can lead to fibrosis and tissue damage, as seen in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In advanced IPF, tissue damage manifests as honeycombing, or voids in the lungs. This study explores how transforming growth factor‐beta (TGF‐β), a crucial factor in IPF, induces lung fibroblast spheroids to create voids in reconstituted collagen through proteolysis and cell contractility, a process we termed as hole formation. These voids reduce when proteases are blocked. Spheroids mimic fibroblast foci observed in IPF. Results indicate that cell contractility mediates tissue opening by stretching fractures in the collagen meshwork. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), including MMP1 and MT1‐MMP, are essential for hole formation, with invadopodia playing a significant role. Blocking MMPs reduces hole size and promotes wound healing. This study shows how TGF‐β induces excessive tissue destruction and how blocking proteolysis can reverse damage, offering insights into IPF pathology and potential therapeutic interventions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Wound Healing and Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering Yale University New Haven CT 06520 USA
Department of Medicine (Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep) Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT 06510 USA
Funding
National Institute of General Medical Sciences · National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.02410.1016/j.cell.2021.06.024 ↗
2. 10.2217/rme-2018-007310.2217/rme-2018-0073 ↗
3. 10.1038/nm.280710.1038/nm.2807 ↗
4. 10.1165/rcmb.2015-0166PS10.1165/rcmb.2015-0166PS ↗
5. 10.2214/AJR.10.487310.2214/AJR.10.4873 ↗
6. 10.1164/rccm.2009-040GL10.1164/rccm.2009-040GL ↗
7. 10.3390/ijms1908246010.3390/ijms19082460 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41419-019-1873-x10.1038/s41419-019-1873-x ↗
9. 10.1038/s41467-018-04336-z10.1038/s41467-018-04336-z ↗
10. 10.1164/rccm.200602-205OC10.1164/rccm.200602-205OC ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat444410.1038/nmat4444 ↗
12. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100668410.1371/journal.pcbi.1006684 ↗
13. 10.1038/nrm386110.1038/nrm3861 ↗
14. 10.1083/jcb.20040802810.1083/jcb.200408028 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60052-410.1016/S0140-6736(11)60052-4 ↗
16. 10.1371/journal.pmed.005009310.1371/journal.pmed.0050093 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.pupt.2010.08.00110.1016/j.pupt.2010.08.001 ↗
18. 10.1378/chest.07-211610.1378/chest.07-2116 ↗
19. 10.1183/09031936.02.0002230210.1183/09031936.02.00022302 ↗
20. 10.1164/ajrccm.162.5.990609610.1164/ajrccm.162.5.9906096 ↗
21. 10.1155/2014/52175410.1155/2014/521754 ↗
22. 10.3390/ijms2124973910.3390/ijms21249739 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.02810.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.028 ↗
24. 10.1038/nrm314110.1038/nrm3141 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10585-006-9014-110.1007/s10585-006-9014-1 ↗
26. 10.1038/ncb297210.1038/ncb2972 ↗
27. 10.1089/ten.tea.2020.033210.1089/ten.tea.2020.0332 ↗
28. 10.1038/ncomms1103610.1038/ncomms11036 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.07.04110.1016/j.bpj.2019.07.041 ↗
30. 10.3390/cells1009244310.3390/cells10092443 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20220788210.1002/adma.202207882 ↗
32. 10.1117/1.JBO.19.8.08601410.1117/1.JBO.19.8.086014 ↗
33. Gong X. · bioRxiv · 2023 · 10
34. 10.1039/C6IB00030D10.1039/C6IB00030D ↗
35. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.07.00210.1016/j.yexcr.2007.07.002 ↗
36. 10.1513/pats.201203-023AW10.1513/pats.201203-023AW ↗
37. 10.1038/s41598-023-37776-910.1038/s41598-023-37776-9 ↗
38. 10.1111/j.1523-1747.2003.12627.x10.1111/j.1523-1747.2003.12627.x ↗
39. 10.1074/jbc.275.5.357710.1074/jbc.275.5.3577 ↗
40. 10.1165/rcmb.2015-0020TR10.1165/rcmb.2015-0020TR ↗
41. 10.1038/s41467-019-12930-y10.1038/s41467-019-12930-y ↗
42. 10.1083/jcb.20121015210.1083/jcb.201210152 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.09.00810.1016/j.ejcb.2010.09.008 ↗
44. 10.1073/pnas.073738110010.1073/pnas.0737381100 ↗
45. 10.3389/fonc.2019.0137010.3389/fonc.2019.01370 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41598-021-95935-210.1038/s41598-021-95935-2 ↗
47. 10.1038/nrd439010.1038/nrd4390 ↗
48. 10.1038/s42003-022-03121-510.1038/s42003-022-03121-5 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsami.9b0791210.1021/acsami.9b07912 ↗
50. Count nuclear foci – ImageJ https://microscopy.duke.edu/guides/count‐nuclear‐foci‐ImageJ(accessed: October 2023).