Machine‐Assisted Discovery of Chondroitinase ABC Complexes toward Sustained Neural Regeneration
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Among the many molecules that contribute to glial scarring, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) are known to be potent inhibitors of neuronal regeneration. Chondroitinase ABC (ChABC), a bacterial lyase, degrades the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) side chains of CSPGs and promotes tissue regeneration. However, ChABC is thermally unstable and loses all activity within a few hours at 37 °C under dilute conditions. To overcome this limitation, the discovery of a diverse set of tailor‐made random copolymers that complex and stabilize ChABC at physiological temperature is reported. The copolymer designs, which are based on chain length and composition of the copolymers, are identified using an active machine learning paradigm, which involves iterative copolymer synthesis, testing for ChABC thermostability upon copolymer complexation, Gaussian process regression modeling, and Bayesian optimization. Copolymers are synthesized by automated PET‐RAFT and thermostability of ChABC is assessed by retained enzyme activity (REA) after 24 h at 37 °C. Significant improvements in REA in three iterations of active learning are demonstrated while identifying exceptionally high‐performing copolymers. Most remarkably, one designed copolymer promotes residual ChABC activity near 30%, even after one week and notably outperforms other common stabilization methods for ChABC. Together, these results highlight a promising pathway toward sustained tissue regeneration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nerve injury and regeneration · Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Biomedical Engineering Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Piscataway NJ 08854 USA
Chemical and Biological Engineering Princeton University Princeton NJ 08544 USA
Funding
National Institutes of Health · National Science Foundation · New Jersey Commission on Spinal Cord Research
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nrn132610.1038/nrn1326 ↗
2. 10.4103/2152-7806.8373210.4103/2152-7806.83732 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-019-11707-710.1038/s41467-019-11707-7 ↗
4. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-11-03398.199110.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-11-03398.1991 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.tins.2009.08.00210.1016/j.tins.2009.08.002 ↗
6. 10.1242/jcs.03264910.1242/jcs.032649 ↗
7. 10.1155/2014/84532310.1155/2014/845323 ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1365-2613.2011.00807.x10.1111/j.1365-2613.2011.00807.x ↗
9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-06-02225.200210.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-06-02225.2002 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0014-4886(03)00087-610.1016/S0014-4886(03)00087-6 ↗
11. 10.1038/416636a10.1038/416636a ↗
12. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2980-06.200610.1523/JNEUROSCI.2980-06.2006 ↗
13. 10.1089/neu.2005.22.22610.1089/neu.2005.22.226 ↗
14. 10.1096/fj.03-0196fje10.1096/fj.03-0196fje ↗
15. 10.1038/s41593-019-0424-110.1038/s41593-019-0424-1 ↗
16. 10.1002/jnr.2119910.1002/jnr.21199 ↗
17. 10.1073/pnas.090543710610.1073/pnas.0905437106 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2017.06.00410.1016/j.enzmictec.2017.06.004 ↗
19. 10.1111/cns.1298410.1111/cns.12984 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.01.00910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.01.009 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.11.02710.1016/j.jconrel.2020.11.027 ↗
22. 10.1093/brain/awy00710.1093/brain/awy007 ↗
23. 10.1021/jacs.8b1033810.1021/jacs.8b10338 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41586-021-03408-310.1038/s41586-021-03408-3 ↗
25. 10.1126/science.aao033510.1126/science.aao0335 ↗
26. 10.1126/sciadv.abc621610.1126/sciadv.abc6216 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41578-021-00282-310.1038/s41578-021-00282-3 ↗
28. 10.1002/aisy.20190012610.1002/aisy.201900126 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.addr.2020.11.00910.1016/j.addr.2020.11.009 ↗
30. 10.1021/ma502120910.1021/ma5021209 ↗
31. 10.1002/anie.20160011210.1002/anie.201600112 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0186410.1021/acs.macromol.8b01864 ↗
33. 10.1039/C7CS00587C10.1039/C7CS00587C ↗
34. 10.1021/ja501745g10.1021/ja501745g ↗
35. 10.1039/C7PY00007C10.1039/C7PY00007C ↗
36. 10.1021/jacs.9b0989910.1021/jacs.9b09899 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0192310.1021/acs.macromol.9b01923 ↗
38. 10.1142/S179398441750005210.1142/S1793984417500052 ↗
39. Fabian Pedregosa G. V. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
40. b)J.Bergstra D.Yamins D.Cox in Int. Conf. on Machine Learning 2013 Atlanta USA p. 115;
41. c)C. K.Williams C. E.Rasmussen Cambridge MA MIT Press 2006 Vol. 2 p. 4.
42. R. A.Patel C. H.Borca M. A.Webb ChemRxiv 2021 https://doi.org/10.33774/chemrxiv‐2021‐m74c8.
43. a)J.Močkus in Optimization Techniques IFIP Technical Conference Novosibirsk Russia 1975 p. 400;10.1007/978-3-662-38527-2_55 ↗
44. b)J.Mockus in IFIP Congress 1977 (August) Toronto Canada p. 195;
45. c)J.Mockus In System Modeling and Optimization 1982 p. 473;
46. d)M.Ester H. P.Kriegel J.Sander X.Xu In KDD 1996 August 96 226;
47. Steinhaus H. · Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. · 1957 · 4 · 801
48. f)J.MacQueen Proc. 5th Berkeley Symp. Math. Stat. Probab. Univ. Calif. Los Angeles 1965/661967 p.281.