journal article·2026-03-11Open access

Application of machine learning to nanomaterial design with silver nanoprisms

Constantin Richard, Paul-Adrien Pichon, Jaroslava Nováková, Neda Irannejad Najafabadi, Jacinto Sá

Discover Nano· Volume 21· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Achieving reproducible synthesis of nanomaterials with tunable optical and morphological properties remains a central challenge in materials design. Conventional trial-and-error strategies struggle with the nonlinear transitions governing nanoparticle growth, often limiting control over plasmonic responses. Here, we introduce a convolutional neural network (CNN) framework that couples in situ time-resolved UV–Vis spectroscopy with the synthesis of silver nanoprisms, extracting predictive rules for morphology and optical behavior. By leveraging transient spectral dynamics rather than endpoint data alone, the model captures hidden growth pathways and accurately predicts final size distributions and plasmonic signatures from a modest experimental dataset. This machine-learning-assisted methodology integrates directly into synthesis workflows, reducing experimental burden while enhancing reproducibility. Beyond silver nanoprisms, the strategy provides a transferable route for rational design of nanomaterials with tailored optical functionalities, advancing the broader goal of data-driven materials design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Hisatomi T, Domen K. Reaction systems for solar hydrogen production via water splitting with particulate semiconductor photocatalysts. Nat Catal. 2019;2:387–99. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0242-6.10.1038/s41929-019-0242-6 ↗
2. Takata T, Jiang J, Sakata Y, Nakabayashi M, Shibata N, Nandal V, et al. Photocatalytic water splitting with a quantum efficiency of almost unity. Nature. 2020;581:411–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2278-9.10.1038/s41586-020-2278-9 ↗
3. Atwater HA, Polman A. Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices. Nat Mater. 2010;9:205–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2629.10.1038/nmat2629 ↗
4. Linic S, Christopher P, Ingram DB. Plasmonic-metal nanostructures for efficient conversion of solar to chemical energy. Nat Mater. 2011;10:911–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3151.10.1038/nmat3151 ↗
5. Zhou L, Huang Q, Xia Y. Plasmon-induced hot electrons in nanostructured materials: generation, collection, and application to photochemistry. Chem Rev. 2024;124:8597–619. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00165.10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00165 ↗
6. Raman AP, Anoma MA, Zhu L, Rephaeli E, Fan S. Passive radiative cooling below ambient air temperature under direct sunlight. Nature. 2014;515:540–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13883.10.1038/nature13883 ↗
7. Zhai Y, Ma Y, David SN, Zhao D, Lou R, Tan G, et al. Scalable-manufactured randomized glass–polymer hybrid metamaterial for daytime radiative cooling. Science. 2017;355:1062–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai7899.10.1126/science.aai7899 ↗
8. Xia Y, Xiong Y, Lim B, Skrabalak SE. Shape-controlled synthesis of metal nanocrystals: simple chemistry meets complex physics? Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48:60–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200802248.10.1002/anie.200802248 ↗
9. Liz-Marzán LM, Kagan CR, Millstone JE. Reproducibility in nanocrystal synthesis? Watch out for impurities! ACS Nano. 2020;14:6359–61. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c04709.10.1021/acsnano.0c04709 ↗
10. Skrabalak SE. Continuous flow routes to colloidal nanoparticles. Chem Mater. 2016;28:3732–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00472.10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00472 ↗
11. Aherne D, Ledwidth DM, Gara M, Kelly JM. Optical properties and growth aspects of silver nanoprisms produced by a highly reproducible and rapid synthesis at room temperature. Adv Funct Mater. 2008;18:2005–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200800233.10.1002/adfm.200800233 ↗
12. Mulvaney P. Surface plasmon spectroscopy of nanosized metal particles. Langmuir. 1996;12:788–800. https://doi.org/10.1021/la9502711.10.1021/la9502711 ↗
13. Kelly KL, Coronado E, Zhao LL, Schatz GC. The optical properties of metal nanoparticles: the influence of size, shape, and dielectric environment. J Phys Chem B. 2003;107:668–77. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp026731y.10.1021/jp026731y ↗
14. Shuford KL, Ratner MA, Schatz GC. Multipolar excitation in triangular nanoprisms. J Chem Phys. 2005;123:114713. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2008258.10.1063/1.2008258 ↗
15. Wiley BJ, Im SH, Li Z-Y, McLellan J, Siekkinen A, Xia Y. Maneuvering the surface plasmon resonance of silver nanostructures through shape-controlled synthesis. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:15666–75. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0608628.10.1021/jp0608628 ↗
16. Liz-Marzán LM. Tailoring surface plasmons through the morphology and assembly of metal nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2006;22:32–41. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0513353.10.1021/la0513353 ↗
17. Murphy CJ, Jana NR. Controlling the aspect ratio of inorganic nanorods and nanowires. Adv Mater. 2002;14:80–2. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4095(20020104)14:1.10.1002/1521-4095(20020104)14:1 ↗
18. Besenhard MO, Pal S, Gkogkos G, Gavriilidis A. Non-fouling Flow Reactors for Nanomaterial Synthesis. React Chem Eng. 2023;8:955–77. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RE00412G.10.1039/D2RE00412G ↗
19. Kioumourtzoglou S, Hof S, Kalk C, Tóth V, Görlin M, Nováková J, et al. Nanomaterials as a Service (NaaS) concept: on-demand protocols for volume synthesis of nanomaterials. Nanoscale Horiz. 2024;9:1364–71. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4NH00174E.10.1039/D4NH00174E ↗
20. Hof S, Kioumourtzoglou S, Nováková J, Görlin M, Sá J. Continuous flow synthesis of Prussian Blue and analogues assisted by AI. Adv Mater Technol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202401566.10.1002/admt.202401566 ↗
21. Bilén F, Ekborg-Tanner P, Balzano A, Ughetto M, da Silva RR, Schomaker H, et al. Machine learning-based interpretation of optical properties of colloidal gold with convolutional neural networks. J Phys Chem C. 2024;128:13909–16. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c02971.10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c02971 ↗
22. Mekki-Berrada F, Ren Z, Huang T, Wong WK, Zheng F, Xie J, et al. Two-step machine learning enables optimized nanoparticle synthesis. npj Comput Mater. 2021;7:55. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00520-w.10.1038/s41524-021-00520-w ↗
23. Diao S, Wu Q, Li S, Xu G, Ren X, Tan L, et al. From synthesis to properties: expanding the horizons of machine learning in nanomaterials research. Mater Horiz. 2025;12:4133–64. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4MH01909A.10.1039/D4MH01909A ↗
24. Xu P, Ji X, Li M, Lu W. Small data machine learning in materials science. npj Comput Mater. 2023;9:42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-01000-z.10.1038/s41524-023-01000-z ↗
25. Wei J, Chu X, Sun Y, Xu K, Deng H-X, Chen J, et al. Machine learning in materials science. InfoMat. 2019;1:338–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/inf2.12028.10.1002/inf2.12028 ↗
26. Austin GI, Pe’er I, Korem T. Distributional bias compromises leave-one-out cross-validation. Sci Adv. 2025;11:eadx6976. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adx6976.10.1126/sciadv.adx6976 ↗
27. Abdar A, Pourpanah F, Hussain S, Rezazadegan Tavakoli A, Oh MH, Mehbodniya S, et al. A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: techniques, applications and challenges. Inf Fusion. 2021;76:243–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008.10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008 ↗
28. Hüllermeier E, Waegeman W. Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning: an introduction to concepts and methods. Mach Learn. 2021;110:457–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-019-05802-2.10.1007/s10994-019-05802-2 ↗
29. Chicco D, Warrens MJ, Jurman G. The coefficient of determination R2 is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, and RMSE in regression analysis. PeerJ Computer Science. 2020;6:e623. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.623.10.7717/peerj-cs.623 ↗
30. Willmott CJ, Matsuura K. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Clim Res. 2005;30:79–82. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr030079.10.3354/cr030079 ↗