journal article·2024-09-27Open access

Design, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic evaluation of a lecithin-chitosan hybrid nanoparticle-loaded dual-responsive in situ gel of nebivolol for effective treatment of glaucoma

Pradeep Singh Rawat, Punna Rao Ravi, Radhika Rajiv Mahajan

Discover Nano· Volume 19· Issue 1

Abstract

In this research work, optimized nebivolol-loaded lecithin-chitosan hybrid nanoparticles (NEB-LCNPs) were prepared using sequential screening and optimization designs. The design of experiments software (DoE) was used to obtain a robust formulation that can improve ocular delivery of the NEB in the treatment of glaucoma. The optimized NEB-LCNPs had a mean particle size of 170.5 ± 5.3 nm and drug loading of 10.5 ± 1.2%. These were further loaded in a dual-responsive in situ gel, designed and reported previously by our group. The NEB-LCNPs loaded in situ gel (NEB-LCNPs-ISG) was characterized for physicochemical properties, rheological behavior, stability, in vitro dissolution, and ocular in vivo studies. The ocular pharmacokinetics showed that NEB-LCNPs-ISG had two-fold higher aqueous humor exposure with AUC 0–tlast of 375.4 ng × h/mL and sustained drug concentrations for longer durations (1.7-folds higher duration with a mean residence time of 10.6 h) in comparison to a conventional aqueous suspension of NEB (NEB-Susp). Similarly, the pharmacodynamic study showed that NEB-LCNPs-ISG resulted in a higher percentage reduction in intraocular pressure (% ΔIOP) of 28.1 ± 1.8% × h, which was 2.2-times higher reduction compared to NEB-Susp (74.2 ± 3.2% × h). In addition, the pharmacodynamic effect was more sustained with a mean response time of 11.3 ± 0.2 h, a 2.8-times higher response time compared to NEB-Susp (4.06 ± 0.3 h). These results suggest that NEB-LCNPs-ISG was more effective than the conventional aqueous suspension of NEB in the treatment of glaucoma.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Drug Delivery Systems · Ocular Surface and Contact Lens · Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Inoue K. Managing adverse effects of glaucoma medications. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:903.10.2147/OPTH.S44708 ↗
2. Coats A, Jain S. Protective effects of nebivolol from oxidative stress to prevent hypertension-related target organ damage. J Hum Hypertens. 2017;31:376–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2017.8.10.1038/jhh.2017.8 ↗
3. Rawat PS, et al. Design, characterization and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic evaluation of poloxamer and kappa-carrageenan-based dual-responsive in situ gel of nebivolol for treatment of open-angle glaucoma. Pharmaceutics. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020405.10.3390/pharmaceutics15020405 ↗
4. Kolawole OM, Cook MT. In situ gelling drug delivery systems for topical drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2023;184(2022):36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2023.01.007.10.1016/j.ejpb.2023.01.007 ↗
5. Wu Y, et al. Research progress of in-situ gelling ophthalmic drug delivery system. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2019;14(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajps.2018.04.008.10.1016/j.ajps.2018.04.008 ↗
6. Khan MS, Ravi PR, Dhavan DS. Design, optimization and pharmacokinetic evaluation of PLGA phosphatidylcholine hybrid nanoparticles of triamcinolone acetonide loaded in situ gel for topical ocular delivery. Int J Pharm. 2023;647: 123530.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123530 ↗
7. Jiménez-Gómez CP, Cecilia JA. Chitosan: a natural biopolymer with a wide and varied range of applications. Molecules. 2020;25(17):3981.10.3390/molecules25173981 ↗
8. Zamboulis A, et al. Chitosan and its derivatives for ocular delivery formulations: recent advances and developments. Polymers. 2020;12(7):1519.10.3390/polym12071519 ↗
9. Chatterjee B, Amalina N, Sengupta P, Mandal UK. Mucoadhesive polymers and their mode of action: a recent update. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2017;7(5):195–203.
10. Smith J, Wood E, Dornish M. Effect of chitosan on epithelial cell tight junctions. Pharm Res. 2004;21:43–9.10.1023/B:PHAM.0000012150.60180.e3 ↗
11. Souza JG, Dias K, Pereira TA, Bernardi DS, Lopez RFV. Topical delivery of ocular therapeutics: carrier systems and physical methods. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2014;66(4):507–30.10.1111/jphp.12132 ↗
12. Dong W et al. Self-assembled lecithin/chitosan nanoparticles based on phospholipid complex: a feasible strategy to improve entrapment efficiency and transdermal delivery of poorly lipophilic drug. Int J Nanomed. 2020;5629–43.10.2147/IJN.S261162 ↗
13. Saha M, et al. QbD based development of resveratrol-loaded mucoadhesive lecithin/chitosan nanoparticles for prolonged ocular drug delivery. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2021;63: 102480.10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102480 ↗
14. Albarqi HA, Garg A, Ahmad MZ, Alqahtani AA, Walbi IA, Ahmad J. Recent progress in chitosan-based nanomedicine for its ocular application in glaucoma. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(2):681.10.3390/pharmaceutics15020681 ↗
15. Bhatta RS, et al. Mucoadhesive nanoparticles for prolonged ocular delivery of natamycin: in vitro and pharmacokinetics studies. Int J Pharm. 2012;432(1–2):105–12.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.04.060 ↗
16. Abdelmonem R, Elhabal SF, Abdelmalak NS, El-Nabarawi MA, Teaima MH. Formulation and characterization of acetazolamide/carvedilol niosomal gel for glaucoma treatment: in vitro, and in vivo study. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(2):221.10.3390/pharmaceutics13020221 ↗
17. A. Harugade, A. P. Sherje, and A. Pethe, "Chitosan: A review on properties, biological activities and recent progress in biomedical applications," React. Funct. Polym., p. 105634, 2023.10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2023.105634 ↗
18. Ahn SJ, et al. Use of rabbit eyes in pharmacokinetic studies of intraocular drugs. JoVE J Vis Exp. 2016;113: e53878.
19. Szabo Z-I, Szabo T, Emőke R, Sipos E. Validated HPLC method for determination of nebivolol in pharmaceutical dosage form and in vitro dissolution studies, Stud Univ Babes-Bolyai Chem, 2014;59(4).
20. Rawat PS, Ravi PR, Kaswan L, Raghuvanshi RS. Development and validation of a bio-analytical method for simultaneous quantification of nebivolol and labetalol in aqueous humor and plasma using LC-MS/MS and its application to ocular pharmacokinetic studies. J Chromatogr B. 2020;1136: 121908.10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.121908 ↗
21. Fereig SA, El-Zaafarany GM, Arafa MG, Abdel-Mottaleb MMA. Self-assembled tacrolimus-loaded lecithin-chitosan hybrid nanoparticles for in vivo management of psoriasis. Int J Pharm. 2021;608: 121114.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121114 ↗
22. Dalvi A, Ravi PR, Uppuluri CT. Rufinamide-loaded chitosan nanoparticles in xyloglucan-based thermoresponsive in situ gel for direct nose to brain delivery. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12: 691936.10.3389/fphar.2021.691936 ↗
23. Murthy A, Ravi PR, Kathuria H, Vats R. Self-assembled lecithin-chitosan nanoparticles improve the oral bioavailability and alter the pharmacokinetics of raloxifene. Int J Pharm. 2020;588: 119731.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119731 ↗
24. Maguire CM, Rösslein M, Wick P, Prina-Mello A. Characterisation of particles in solution–a perspective on light scattering and comparative technologies. In: Science and technology of advanced materials, Vol. 19, Issue 1, Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2018. pp. 732–745 https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2018.1517587.10.1080/14686996.2018.1517587 ↗
25. Okur NÜ, Yozgatli V, Okur ME. In vitro–in vivo evaluation of tetrahydrozoline-loaded ocular in situ gels on rabbits for allergic conjunctivitis management. Drug Dev Res. 2020;81(6):716–27.10.1002/ddr.21677 ↗
26. Singhvi G, Singh M. In-vitro drug release characterization models. Int J Pharm Stud Res. 2011;2(1):77–84.
27. Moosa RM, et al. In vivo evaluation and in-depth pharmaceutical characterization of a rapidly dissolving solid ocular matrix for the topical delivery of timolol maleate in the rabbit eye model. Int J Pharm. 2014;466(1–2):296–306.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.02.032 ↗
28. Batista-Duharte A, et al. The hen’s egg test on chorioallantoic membrane: an alternative assay for the assessment of the irritating effect of vaccine adjuvants. Int J Toxicol. 2016;35(6):627–33.10.1177/1091581816672187 ↗
29. Drahansky M, et al. We are IntechOpen, the world’ s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists TOP 1 %. INTECH. 2016;i:13. https://doi.org/10.5772/57353.10.5772/57353 ↗
30. Diwan R, Ravi PR, Agarwal SI, Aggarwal V. Cilnidipine loaded poly (ε-caprolactone) nanoparticles for enhanced oral delivery: optimization using DoE, physical characterization, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic evaluation. Pharm Dev Technol. 2021;26(3):278–90.10.1080/10837450.2020.1864643 ↗
31. Yasser M, El Naggar EE, Elfar N, Teaima MH, El-Nabarawi MA, Elhabal SF. Formulation, optimization and evaluation of ocular gel containing nebivolol Hcl-loaded ultradeformable spanlastics nanovesicles: in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Pharm X. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpx.2023.100228I.10.1016/j.ijpx.2023.100228I ↗
32. Soni PK, Saini TR. Formulation design and optimization of cationic-charged liposomes of brimonidine tartrate for effective ocular drug delivery by design of experiment (DoE) approach. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2021;47(11):1847–66.10.1080/03639045.2022.2070198 ↗
33. Uppuluri CT, Ravi PR, Dalvi AV. Design and evaluation of thermo-responsive nasal in situ gelling system dispersed with piribedil loaded lecithin-chitosan hybrid nanoparticles for improved brain availability. Neuropharmacology. 2021;201:108832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108832.10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108832 ↗
34. Vaneev A, et al. Nanotechnology for topical drug delivery to the anterior segment of the eye. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(22):12368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212368.10.3390/ijms222212368 ↗
35. Onugwu AL, et al. Nanotechnology based drug delivery systems for the treatment of anterior segment eye diseases. J Controll Release. 2023;354:465–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.01.018.10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.01.018 ↗
36. Kaiser M, et al. Chitosan encapsulation modulates the effect of capsaicin on the tight junctions of MDCK cells. Sci Rep. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10048.10.1038/srep10048 ↗