Fabrication of molecular nanoscale junctions with a junction area of 7 × 7 nm2 and their structural and electrical properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Molecular electronics has received considerable attention because molecular devices can provide several unique properties, such as giant magnetoresistance, a large Seebeck effect, and nonvolatile switching properties. These unique properties, including enhanced performances, have been observed in molecular nanoscale devices. Therefore, the miniaturization of molecular devices is a key issue for their practical use as well as for the development of fundamental science. In a previous study, we proposed a new nanojunction fabrication method using thin-film edges and successfully fabricated Ni 78 Fe 22 /2,7-dioctyl[1]benzothieno[3,2- b ][1]benzothiophene (C8-BTBT)/Ni 78 Fe 22 nanojunctions with a junction area of 42 × 42 nm 2 . In this study, toward the realization of a smaller junction area, we fabricate Ni 78 Fe 22 /C8-BTBT/Ni 78 Fe 22 nanojunctions using our advanced method. As electrodes in our nanojunctions, 7-nm-thick Ni 78 Fe 22 thin films sandwiched between low-softening-point glasses can be fabricated using the thermal pressing technique. The area of the nanojunctions is determined from the thickness of the Ni 78 Fe 22 thin film. Using these electrodes, we have successfully fabricated Ni 78 Fe 22 /C8-BTBT/Ni 78 Fe 22 nanojunctions with a junction area of 7 × 7 nm 2 , which is the minimum value ever reported for edge-to-edge nanodevices, and observed electrical conduction through C8-BTBT molecules in the devices. Our study provides a novel nanofabrication technique and opens new opportunities for research in molecular nanoelectronics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Barraud C, et al. Unravelling the role of the interface for spin injection into organic semiconductors. Nat Phys. 2010;6:615–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1688.10.1038/nphys1688 ↗
2. Rocha AR, et al. Towards molecular spintronics. Nat Mater. 2005;4:335–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1349.10.1038/nmat1349 ↗
3. Chen Y, et al. Nanoscale molecular-switch devices fabricated by imprint lithography. Appl Phys Lett. 2003;82:1610–2. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1559439.10.1063/1.1559439 ↗
4. Wu P, Dharmadhikari B, Patra P, Xiong X. Rotaxane nanomachines in future molecular electronics. Nanoscale Adv. 2022;4:3418–61. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NA00057A.10.1039/D2NA00057A ↗
5. Chen J, Reed MA, Rawlett AM, Tour JM. Large on-off ratios and negative differential resistance in a molecular electronic device. Science. 1999;286:1550–2. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5444.1550.10.1126/science.286.5444.1550 ↗
6. Xu X, Gao C, Emusani R, Jia C, Xiang D. Toward practical single-molecule/atom switches. Adv Sci. 2024;11:2400877. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202400877.10.1002/advs.202400877 ↗
7. Xiong ZH, Wu D, Vardeny ZV, Shi J. Giant magnetoresistance in organic spin-valves. Nature. 2004;427:821–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02325.10.1038/nature02325 ↗
8. Hicks LD, Dresselhaus MS. Effect of quantum-well structures on the thermoelectric figure of merit. Phys Rev B. 1993;47:12727–31. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.12727.10.1103/PhysRevB.47.12727 ↗
9. Gan BY, et al. Boosting thermoelectric performance of molecular junction by utilizing edge branches and weak coupling. J Appl Phys. 2024;136:135101. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0227631.10.1063/5.0227631 ↗
10. Fu HH, Gu L, Wu DD, Zhang ZQ. Enhancement of the thermoelectric figure of merit in DNA-like systems induced by Fano and Dicke effects. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17:11077–87. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP04382K.10.1039/C4CP04382K ↗
11. Lee SK, Ohto T, Yamada R, Tada H. Thermopower of benzenedithiol and C60 molecular junctions with Ni and Au electrodes. Nano Lett. 2014;14:5276–80. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl502305e.10.1021/nl502305e ↗
12. Lee SK, Buerkle M, Yamada R, Asai Y, Tada H. Thermoelectricity at the molecular scale: a large Seebeck effect in endohedral metallofullerenes. Nanoscale. 2015;7:20497–502. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR05394C.10.1039/C5NR05394C ↗
13. Tsutsui M, Morikawa T, He Y, Arima A, Taniguchi M. High thermopower of mechanically stretched single-molecule junctions. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11519. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11519.10.1038/srep11519 ↗
14. Gemma A, et al. Full thermoelectric characterization of a single molecule. Nat Commun. 2023;14:3868. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39368-7.10.1038/s41467-023-39368-7 ↗
15. Kojima H, et al. Universality of the giant Seebeck effect in organic small molecules. Mater Chem Front. 2018;2:1276–83. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7QM00596B.10.1039/C7QM00596B ↗
16. Jang J, Jo JW, Ohto T, Yoon HJ. Seebeck effect in molecular wires facilitating long-range transport. J Am Chem Soc. 2024;146:4922–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c14012.10.1021/jacs.3c14012 ↗
17. Jasim SA, et al. Molecular junctions: introduction and physical foundations, nanoelectrical conductivity and electronic structure and charge transfer in organic molecular junctions. Braz J Phys. 2022;52:31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-021-01033-z.10.1007/s13538-021-01033-z ↗
18. Li T, Bandari VK, Schmidt OG. Molecular electronics: creating and bridging molecular junctions and promoting its commercialization. Adv Mater. 2023;35:2209088. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202209088.10.1002/adma.202209088 ↗
19. Xiang D, Jeong H, Lee T, Mayer D. Mechanically controllable break junctions for molecular electronics. Adv Mater. 2013;25:4845–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201301589.10.1002/adma.201301589 ↗
20. Martin CA, Ding D, Van Der Zant HSJ, Van Ruitenbeek JM. Lithographic mechanical break junctions for single-molecule measurements in vacuum: possibilities and limitations. New J Phys. 2008;10:065008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/10/6/065008.10.1088/1367-2630/10/6/065008 ↗
21. Yamada R, Noguchi M, Tada H. Magnetoresistance of single molecular junctions measured by a mechanically controllable break junction method. Appl Phys Lett. 2011;98:053110. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3549190.10.1063/1.3549190 ↗
22. Zschieschang U, Klauk H, Borchert JW. High-resolution lithography for high-frequency organic thin-film transistors. Adv Mater Technol. 2023;8:2201888. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202201888.10.1002/admt.202201888 ↗
23. Dediu V, Murgia M, Matacotta FC, Taliani C, Barbanera S. Room temperature spin polarized injection in organic semiconductor. Solid State Commun. 2002;122:181–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-1098(02)00090-X.10.1016/S0038-1098(02)00090-X ↗
24. Dürr AC, et al. Morphology and interdiffusion behavior of evaporated metal films on crystalline diindenoperylene thin films. J Appl Phys. 2003;93:5201–9. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1556180.10.1063/1.1556180 ↗
25. Matsuzaka M, et al. Room-temperature magnetoresistance in Ni78Fe22/C8-BTBT/Ni78Fe22 nanojunctions fabricated from magnetic thin-film edges using a novel technique. Nanoscale Adv. 2022;4:4739–47. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NA00442A.10.1039/D2NA00442A ↗
26. Xie Z, et al. Spin specific electron conduction through DNA oligomers. Nano Lett. 2011;11:4652–5. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl2021637.10.1021/nl2021637 ↗
27. Göhler B, et al. Spin selectivity in electron transmission through self-assembled monolayers of double-stranded DNA. Science. 2011;331:894–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199339.10.1126/science.1199339 ↗
28. Li S, et al. Chiral bifacial indacenodithiophene-based π-conjugated polymers with chirality-induced spin selectivity. Chem Commun. 2024;60:10870–3. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CC03292F.10.1039/D4CC03292F ↗
29. Bloom BP, Paltiel Y, Naaman R, Waldeck DH. Chiral induced spin selectivity. Chem Rev. 2024;124:1950–91. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00661.10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00661 ↗
30. Suda M, et al. Light-driven molecular switch for reconfigurable spin filters. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2455. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10423-6.10.1038/s41467-019-10423-6 ↗
31. Kulkarni C, et al. Highly efficient and tunable filtering of electrons’ spin by supramolecular chirality of nanofiber-based materials. Adv Mater. 2020;32:1904965. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201904965.10.1002/adma.201904965 ↗
32. Mishra S, et al. Spin filtering along chiral polymers. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59:14671–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202006570.10.1002/anie.202006570 ↗
33. Bloom BP, Kiran V, Varade V, Naaman R, Waldeck DH. Spin selective charge transport through cysteine capped CdSe quantum Dots. Nano Lett. 2016;16:4583–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01880.10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01880 ↗
34. Kiran V, et al. Helicenes - A new class of organic spin filter. Adv Mater. 2016;28:1957–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201504725.10.1002/adma.201504725 ↗
35. Lu H, et al. Spin-dependent charge transport through 2D chiral hybrid lead-iodide perovskites. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaay0571. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay0571.10.1126/sciadv.aay0571 ↗
36. Varade V, et al. Bacteriorhodopsin based non-magnetic spin filters for biomolecular spintronics. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018;20:1091–7. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP06771B.10.1039/C7CP06771B ↗
37. Mathew SP, Mondal PC, Moshe H, Mastai Y, Naaman R. Non-magnetic organic/inorganic spin injector at room temperature. Appl Phys Lett. 2014;105:242408. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4904941.10.1063/1.4904941 ↗
38. Michaeli K, Varade V, Naaman R, Waldeck DH. A new approach towards spintronics-spintronics with no magnets. J Phys : Condens Matter. 2017;29:103002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aa54a4.10.1088/1361-648X/aa54a4 ↗
39. Kang MG, et al. Room temperature chiral magnetoresistance in a chiral-perovskite-based perpendicular spin valve. APL Mater. 2024;12:081118. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0221834.10.1063/5.0221834 ↗
40. Liu T, et al. Linear and nonlinear two-terminal spin-valve effect from chirality-induced spin selectivity. ACS Nano. 2020;14:15983–91. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c07438.10.1021/acsnano.0c07438 ↗
41. Matsuzaka M, et al. Magnetoresistance effect based on spin-selective transport in nanodevices using chiral molecules. Nanoscale. 2025;17:18866–75. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5NR01259G10.1039/D5NR01259G ↗
42. Scheike T, Wen Z, Sukegawa H, Mitani S. 631% room temperature tunnel magnetoresistance with large oscillation effect in CoFe/MgO/CoFe(001) junctions. Appl Phys Lett. 2023;122:112404. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0145873.10.1063/5.0145873 ↗
43. Yuasa S, Nagahama T, Fukushima A, Suzuki Y, Ando K. Giant room-temperature magnetoresistance in single-crystal fe/mgo/fe magnetic tunnel junctions. Nat Mater. 2004;3:868–71. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1257.10.1038/nmat1257 ↗
44. Parkin SSP, et al. Giant tunnelling magnetoresistance at room temperature with MgO (100) tunnel barriers. Nat Mater. 2004;3:862–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1256.10.1038/nmat1256 ↗
45. Ikeda S, et al. Tunnel magnetoresistance of 604% at 300 K by suppression of Ta diffusion in cofeb/mgo/cofeb pseudo-spin-valves annealed at high temperature. Appl Phys Lett. 2008;93:082508. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2976435.10.1063/1.2976435 ↗
46. Butler WH, Zhang XG, Schulthess TC, MacLaren JM. Spin-dependent tunneling conductance of fe|mgo|fe| fe|mgo|fe| fe|mgo|fe sandwiches. Phys Rev B. 2001;63:054416. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.054416.10.1103/PhysRevB.63.054416 ↗
47. International Roadmap for Devices and Systems™ 2022 Edition Executive Summary. (2022). https://irds.ieee.org/images/files/pdf/2022/2022IRDS_ES.pdf
48. Gargini P. International Roadmap for Devices and Systems™ 2023. (2023). https://irds.ieee.org/images/files/pdf/2023/2023IRDS_Perspectives.pdf