Applications of drug delivery systems, organic, and inorganic nanomaterials in wound healing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The skin is known to be the largest organ in the human body, while also being exposed to environmental elements. This indicates that skin is highly susceptible to physical infliction, as well as damage resulting from medical conditions such as obesity and diabetes. The wound management costs in hospitals and clinics are expected to rise globally over the coming years, which provides pressure for more wound healing aids readily available in the market. Recently, nanomaterials have been gaining traction for their potential applications in various fields, including wound healing. Here, we discuss various inorganic nanoparticles such as silver, titanium dioxide, copper oxide, cerium oxide, MXenes, PLGA, PEG, and silica nanoparticles with their respective roles in improving wound healing progression. In addition, organic nanomaterials for wound healing such as collagen, chitosan, curcumin, dendrimers, graphene and its derivative graphene oxide were also further discussed. Various forms of nanoparticle drug delivery systems like nanohydrogels, nanoliposomes, nanofilms, and nanoemulsions were discussed in their function to deliver therapeutic agents to wound sites in a controlled manner.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Wound Healing and Treatments · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Vowden P, Vowden K. The economic impact of hard-to-heal wounds: promoting practice change to address passivity in wound management. Wounds Int. 2016;7(2):10–5.
2. Agha M, Agha R. The rising prevalence of obesity: part A: impact on public health. Int J Surg Oncol. 2017;2(7):17.10.1097/IJ9.0000000000000017 ↗
3. Guest JF, Ayoub N, McIlwraith T, Uchegbu I, Gerrish A, Weidlich D, Vowden K, Vowden P. Health economic burden that wounds impose on the national health service in the UK. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):009283.10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009283 ↗
4. Rowley WR, Bezold C, Arikan Y, Byrne E, Krohe S. Diabetes 2030: insights from yesterday, today, and future trends. Popul Health Manag 2017;20(1):6–12.10.1089/pop.2015.0181 ↗
5. Matter MT, Probst S, Läuchli S, Herrmann IK. Uniting drug and delivery: metal oxide hybrid nanotherapeutics for skin wound care. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(8):780.10.3390/pharmaceutics12080780 ↗
6. Labarrere CA, Woods J, Hardin J, Campana G, Ortiz M, Jaeger B, Reichart B, Bonnin J, Currin A, Cosgrove S. Early prediction of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and heart transplant failure. Am J Transp. 2011;11(3):528–35.10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03401.x ↗
7. Wang F, Hu S, Jia Q, Zhang L. Advances in electrospinning of natural biomaterials for wound dressing. J Nanomater. 2020;2020:1–4.10.1155/2020/8719859 ↗
8. Brumberg V, Astrelina T, Malivanova T, Samoilov A. Modern wound dressings: hydrogel dressings. Biomedicines. 2021;9(9):1235.10.3390/biomedicines9091235 ↗
9. Dhivya S, Padma VV, Santhini E. Wound dressings-a review. Biomedicine. 2015;5(4):22.10.7603/s40681-015-0022-9 ↗
10. Martin C, Low WL, Amin MCIM, Radecka I, Raj P, Kenward K. Current trends in the development of wound dressings, biomaterials and devices. Pharmaceutic Patent Anal. 2013;2(3):341–59.10.4155/ppa.13.18 ↗
11. Hochella MF, Mogk DW, Ranville J, Allen IC, Luther GW, Marr LC, McGrail BP, Murayama M, Qafoku NP, Rosso KM Natural, incidental, and engineered nanomaterials and their impacts on the earth system. Science. 2019;363(6434).10.1126/science.aau8299 ↗
12. Lu Y, Ozcan S. Green nanomaterials: on track for a sustainable future. Nano Today. 2015;10(4):417–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2015.04.010.10.1016/j.nantod.2015.04.010 ↗
13. Sathiyavimal S, Vasantharaj S, Bharathi D, Saravanan M, Manikandan E, Kumar SS, Pugazhendhi A. Biogenesis of copper oxide nanoparticles (cuonps) using sida acuta and their incorporation over cotton fabrics to prevent the pathogenicity of gram negative and gram positive bacteria. J Photochem Photobiol, B. 2018;188:126–34.10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.09.014 ↗
14. Hamdan S, Pastar I, Drakulich S, Dikici E, Tomic-Canic M, Deo S, Daunert S. Nanotechnology-driven therapeutic interventions in wound healing: potential uses and applications. ACS Cent Sci. 2017;3(3):163–75. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.6b00371.10.1021/acscentsci.6b00371 ↗
15. Korrapati PS, Karthikeyan K, Satish A, Krishnaswamy VR, Venugopal JR, Ramakrishna S. Recent advancements in nanotechnological strategies in selection, design and delivery of biomolecules for skin regeneration. Mater Sci Eng, C. 2016;67:747–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.074.10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.074 ↗
16. Rodrigues M, Kosaric N, Bonham CA, Gurtner GC. Wound healing: a cellular perspective. Physiol Rev. 2019;99(1):665–706. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00067.2017.10.1152/physrev.00067.2017 ↗
17. Singh S, Young A, McNaught C-E. The physiology of wound healing. Surgery. 2017;35(9):473–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2017.06.004.10.1016/j.mpsur.2017.06.004 ↗
18. Austin SK. Haemostasis. Medicine. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2021.01.004.10.1016/j.mpmed.2021.01.004 ↗
19. Wang M, Huang X, Zheng H, Tang Y, Zeng K, Shao L, Li L. Nanomaterials applied in wound healing: mechanisms, limitations and perspectives. J Control Release. 2021;337:236–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.07.017.10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.07.017 ↗
20. Kaparekar PS, Pathmanapan S, Anandasadagopan SK. Polymeric scaffold of gallic acid loaded chitosan nanoparticles infused with collagen-fibrin for wound dressing application. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;165:930–47.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.212 ↗
21. Saikia J, Mohammadpour R, Yazdimamaghani M, Northrup H, Hlady V, Ghandehari H. Silica nanoparticle-endothelial interaction: uptake and effect on platelet adhesion under flow conditions. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2018;1(5):1620–7.10.1021/acsabm.8b00466 ↗
22. Tran HD, Moonshi SS, Xu ZP, Ta HT. Influence of nanoparticles on the haemostatic balance: between thrombosis and haemorrhage. Biomater Sci. 2022;10(1):10–50.10.1039/D1BM01351C ↗
23. Dhivya S, Padma VV, Santhini E. Wound dressings - a review. Biomedicine. 2015;5(4):22. https://doi.org/10.7603/s40681-015-0022-9.10.7603/s40681-015-0022-9 ↗
24. Krzyszczyk P, Schloss R, Palmer A, Berthiaume F. The role of macrophages in acute and chronic wound healing and interventions to promote pro-wound healing phenotypes. Front Physiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00419.10.3389/fphys.2018.00419 ↗
25. Takeo M, Lee W, Ito M. Wound healing and skin regeneration. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015;5(1): 023267.10.1101/cshperspect.a023267 ↗
26. Bai Q, Han K, Dong K, Zheng C, Zhang Y, Long Q, Lu T. Potential applications of nanomaterials and technology for diabetic wound healing. Int J Nanomed. 2020;15:9717–43. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.S276001.10.2147/ijn.S276001 ↗
27. Zhang Q, Oh J-H, Park CH, Baek J-H, Ryoo H-M, Woo KM. Effects of dimethyloxalylglycine-embedded poly (ε)-caprolactone) fiber meshes on wound healing in diabetic rats. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(9):7950–63.10.1021/acsami.6b15815 ↗
28. Ahmed R, Tariq M, Ali I, Asghar R, Noorunnisa Khanam P, Augustine R, Hasan A. Novel electrospun chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol/zinc oxide nanofibrous mats with antibacterial and antioxidant properties for diabetic wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;120:385–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.057.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.057 ↗
29. Kruse CR, Singh M, Targosinski S, Sinha I, Sørensen JA, Eriksson E, Nuutila K. The effect of ph on cell viability, cell migration, cell proliferation, wound closure, and wound reepithelialization: In vitro and in vivo study. Wound Repair Regen. 2017;25(2):260–9.10.1111/wrr.12526 ↗
30. Honnegowda TM, Kumar P, Udupa EGP, Kumar S, Kumar U, Rao P. Role of angiogenesis and angiogenic factors in acute and chronic wound healing. Plast Aesthetic Res. 2015;2:243–9.10.4103/2347-9264.165438 ↗
31. Caley MP, Martins VL, O’Toole EA. Metalloproteinases and wound healing. Adv Wound Care. 2015;4(4):225–34.10.1089/wound.2014.0581 ↗
32. Thiruvoth FM, Mohapatra DP, Kumar D, Chittoria SRK, Nandhagopal V. Current concepts in the physiology of adult wound healing. Plast Aesthetic Res. 2015;2:250–6.10.4103/2347-9264.158851 ↗
33. Stone RC, Pastar I, Ojeh N, Chen V, Liu S, Garzon KI, Tomic-Canic M. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in tissue repair and fibrosis. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;365(3):495–506.10.1007/s00441-016-2464-0 ↗
34. Netam AK, Prasad J, Satapathy T. A review on ethnopharmacological approaches to wound healing and curative progression. Res J Pharmacol Pharmacodyn. 2019;11(1):37–45.10.5958/2321-5836.2019.00008.9 ↗
35. Morton LM, Phillips TJ. Wound healing and treating wounds: differential diagnosis and evaluation of chronic wounds. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(4):589–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.08.068.10.1016/j.jaad.2015.08.068 ↗
36. Gonzalez ACdO, Costa TF, Andrade ZdA, Medrado ARAP. Wound healing-a literature review. Anais brasileiros de dermatologia. 2016;91(5):614–620.10.1590/abd1806-4841.20164741 ↗
37. Naskar A, Kim K-S. Recent advances in nanomaterial-based wound-healing therapeutics. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(6):499.10.3390/pharmaceutics12060499 ↗
38. Losi P, Briganti E, Errico C, Lisella A, Sanguinetti E, Chiellini F, Soldani G. Fibrin-based scaffold incorporating vegf- and bfgf-loaded nanoparticles stimulates wound healing in diabetic mice. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(8):7814–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.019.10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.019 ↗
39. Gopal A, Kant V, Gopalakrishnan A, Tandan SK, Kumar D. Chitosan-based copper nanocomposite accelerates healing in excision wound model in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;731:8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.02.033.10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.02.033 ↗
40. Arole V, Munde S. Fabrication of nanomaterials by top-down and bottom-up approaches-an overview. J Mater Sci. 2014;1:89–93.
41. Aarthye P, Sureshkumar M. Green synthesis of nanomaterials: an overview. Mater Today: Proc. 2021;47:907–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.564.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.564 ↗
42. Devatha CP, Thalla AK. Green synthesis of nanomaterials. 2018;Elsevier, London.10.1016/B978-0-08-101975-7.00007-5 ↗
43. Gour A, Jain NK. Advances in green synthesis of nanoparticles. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47(1):844–51.10.1080/21691401.2019.1577878 ↗
44. Choi Y, Lee SY. Biosynthesis of inorganic nanomaterials using microbial cells and bacteriophages. Nat Rev Chem. 2020;4(12):638–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-020-00221-w.10.1038/s41570-020-00221-w ↗
45. Lohse SE, Murphy CJ. Applications of colloidal inorganic nanoparticles: from medicine to energy. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(38):15607–20.10.1021/ja307589n ↗
46. Salem SS, Fouda A. Green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles and their prospective biotechnological applications: an overview. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2021;199(1):344–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-020-02138-3.10.1007/s12011-020-02138-3 ↗
47. Beyth N, Houri-Haddad Y, Domb A, Khan W, Hazan R. Alternative antimicrobial approach: nano-antimicrobial materials. Evidence-Based Complement Alter Med 2015;2015.10.1155/2015/246012 ↗
48. Durán N, Marcato PD, Conti RD, Alves OL, Costa F, Brocchi M. Potential use of silver nanoparticles on pathogenic bacteria, their toxicity and possible mechanisms of action. J Braz Chem Soc. 2010;21:949–59.10.1590/S0103-50532010000600002 ↗
49. Hajialyani M, Tewari D, Sobarzo-Sánchez E, Nabavi SM, Farzaei MH, Abdollahi M. Natural product-based nanomedicines for wound healing purposes: therapeutic targets and drug delivery systems. Int J Nanomed. 2018;13:5023–43. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S174072.10.2147/IJN.S174072 ↗
50. Patil S, Desai N, Mahadik K, Paradkar A. Can green synthesized propolis loaded silver nanoparticulate gel enhance wound healing caused by burns? Eur J Int Med. 2015;7(3):243–50.10.1016/j.eujim.2015.03.002 ↗
51. Thirumurugan G, Veni VS, Ramachandran S, Rao JV, Dhanaraju MD. Superior wound healing effect of topically delivered silver nanoparticle formulation using eco-friendly potato plant pathogenic fungus: synthesis and characterization. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2011;7(5):659–66. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbn.2011.1336.10.1166/jbn.2011.1336 ↗
52. Augustine R, Augustine A, Kalarikkal N, Thomas S. Fabrication and characterization of biosilver nanoparticles loaded calcium pectinate nano-micro dual-porous antibacterial wound dressings. Prog Biomater. 2016;5(3–4):223–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-016-0060-8.10.1007/s40204-016-0060-8 ↗
53. Franková J, Pivodová V, Vágnerová H, Juráňová J, Ulrichová J. Effects of silver nanoparticles on primary cell cultures of fibroblasts and keratinocytes in a wound-healing model. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2016;14(2):137–42.
54. Al-Shmgani HSA, Mohammed WH, Sulaiman GM, Saadoon AH. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles from catharanthus roseus leaf extract and assessing their antioxidant, antimicrobial, and wound-healing activities. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2017;45(6):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2016.1220950.10.1080/21691401.2016.1220950 ↗
55. Wen L, Zeng P, Zhang L, Huang W, Wang H, Chen G. Symbiosis theory-directed green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their application in infected wound healing. Int J Nanomedicine. 2016;11:2757–67. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.S106662.10.2147/ijn.S106662 ↗
56. Sivaranjani V, Philominathan P. Synthesize of titanium dioxide nanoparticles using moringa oleifera leaves and evaluation of wound healing activity. Wound Med. 2016;12:1–5.10.1016/j.wndm.2015.11.002 ↗
57. Tsuang Y-H, Sun J-S, Huang Y-C, Lu C-H, Chang WH-S, Wang C-C. Studies of photokilling of bacteria using titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Artif Organs. 2008;32(2):167–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2007.00530.x.10.1111/j.1525-1594.2007.00530.x ↗
58. Sankar R, Dhivya R, Shivashangari KS, Ravikumar V. Wound healing activity of origanum vulgare engineered titanium dioxide nanoparticles in wistar albino rats. J Mater Sci - Mater Med. 2014;25(7):1701–8.10.1007/s10856-014-5193-5 ↗
59. Hassan H, Omoniyi K, Okibe F, Nuhu A, Echioba E. Assessment of wound healing activity of green synthesized titanium oxide nanoparticles using strychnos spinosa and blighia sapida. J Appl Sci Environ Manag. 2020;24(2):197–206.
60. Borkow G, Gabbay J, Dardik R, Eidelman AI, Lavie Y, Grunfeld Y, Ikher S, Huszar M, Zatcoff RC, Marikovsky M. Molecular mechanisms of enhanced wound healing by copper oxide-impregnated dressings. Wound Rep Regen. 2010;18(2):266–75.10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00573.x ↗
61. Sen S, Sarkar K. Effective biocidal and wound healing cogency of biocompatible glutathione: citrate-capped copper oxide nanoparticles against multidrug-resistant pathogenic enterobacteria. Microb Drug Resist. 2021;27(5):616–27.10.1089/mdr.2020.0131 ↗
62. Sankar R, Baskaran A, Shivashangari KS, Ravikumar V. Inhibition of pathogenic bacterial growth on excision wound by green synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles leads to accelerated wound healing activity in wistar albino rats. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015;26(7):1–7.10.1007/s10856-015-5543-y ↗
63. Naika HR, Lingaraju K, Manjunath K, Kumar D, Nagaraju G, Suresh D, Nagabhushana H. Green synthesis of cuo nanoparticles using gloriosa superba l. Extract and their antibacterial activity. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2015;9(1):7–12.10.1016/j.jtusci.2014.04.006 ↗
64. Awwad A, Albiss B, Salem N. Antibacterial activity of synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles using malva sylvestris leaf extract. SMU Med J. 2015;2(1):91–101.
65. Yallappa S, Manjanna J, Sindhe M, Satyanarayan N, Pramod S, Nagaraja K. Microwave assisted rapid synthesis and biological evaluation of stable copper nanoparticles using t. arjuna bark extract. Spectrochim Acta Part A: Mol Biomol Spectroscop. 2013;110:108–15.10.1016/j.saa.2013.03.005 ↗
66. Sharma JK, Akhtar MS, Ameen S, Srivastava P, Singh G. Green synthesis of cuo nanoparticles with leaf extract of calotropis gigantea and its dye-sensitized solar cells applications. J Alloy Compd. 2015;632:321–5.10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.172 ↗
67. Vaidehi D, Bhuvaneshwari V, Bharathi D, Sheetal BP. Antibacterial and photocatalytic activity of copper oxide nanoparticles synthesized using solanum lycopersicum leaf extract. Mater Res Express. 2018;5(8): 085403.10.1088/2053-1591/aad426 ↗
68. Andualem WW, Sabir FK, Mohammed ET, Belay HH, Gonfa BA. Synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using plant leaf extract of catha edulis and its antibacterial activity. J Nanotechnol. 2020;2020:2932434. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2932434.10.1155/2020/2932434 ↗
69. Verma N, Kumar N. Synthesis and biomedical applications of copper oxide nanoparticles: an expanding horizon. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019;5(3):1170–88. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01092.10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01092 ↗
70. Dhall A, Self W. Cerium oxide nanoparticles: a brief review of their synthesis methods and biomedical applications. Antioxidants. 2018;7(8):97. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox7080097.10.3390/antiox7080097 ↗
71. Das S, Singh S, Dowding JM, Oommen S, Kumar A, Sayle TX, Saraf S, Patra CR, Vlahakis NE, Sayle DC. The induction of angiogenesis by cerium oxide nanoparticles through the modulation of oxygen in intracellular environments. Biomaterials. 2012;33(31):7746–55.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.019 ↗
72. Chigurupati S, Mughal MR, Okun E, Das S, Kumar A, McCaffery M, Seal S, Mattson MP. Effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles on the growth of keratinocytes, fibroblasts and vascular endothelial cells in cutaneous wound healing. Biomaterials. 2013;34(9):2194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.061.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.061 ↗
73. Pezzini I, Marino A, Del Turco S, Nesti C, Doccini S, Cappello V, Gemmi M, Parlanti P, Santorelli FM, Mattoli V. Cerium oxide nanoparticles: the regenerative redox machine in bioenergetic imbalance. Nanomedicine. 2017;12(4):403–16.10.2217/nnm-2016-0342 ↗
74. Kalantari K, Mostafavi E, Saleh B, Soltantabar P, Webster TJ. Chitosan/pva hydrogels incorporated with green synthesized cerium oxide nanoparticles for wound healing applications. Eur Polym J. 2020;134: 109853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109853.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109853 ↗
75. Nadeem M, Khan R, Afridi K, Nadhman A, Ullah S, Faisal S, Mabood ZU, Hano C, Abbasi BH. Green synthesis of cerium oxide nanoparticles (ceo2 nps) and their antimicrobial applications: a review. Int J Nanomed. 2020;15:5951.10.2147/IJN.S255784 ↗
76. Parham S, Wicaksono DHB, Bagherbaigi S, Lee SL, Nur H. Antimicrobial treatment of different metal oxide nanoparticles: A critical review. J Chin Chem Soc. 2016;63(4):385–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.201500446.10.1002/jccs.201500446 ↗
77. Ma X, Cheng Y, Jian H, Feng Y, Chang Y, Zheng R, Wu X, Wang L, Li X, Zhang H. Hollow, rough, and nitric oxide-releasing cerium oxide nanoparticles for promoting multiple stages of wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8(16):1900256.10.1002/adhm.201900256 ↗
78. Bui VKH, Park D, Lee Y-C. Chitosan combined with zno, tio2 and ag nanoparticles for antimicrobial wound healing applications: a mini review of the research trends. Polymers. 2017;9(1):21.10.3390/polym9010021 ↗
79. Ronchi RM, Arantes JT, Santos SF. Synthesis, structure, properties and applications of mxenes: current status and perspectives. Ceram Int. 2019;45(15):18167–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.114.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.114 ↗
80. Lei J-C, Zhang X, Zhou Z. Recent advances in mxene: preparation, properties, and applications. Front Phys. 2015;10(3):276–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-015-0493-x.10.1007/s11467-015-0493-x ↗
81. Gautam R, Marriwala N, Devi R. A review: study of mxene and graphene together. Measure Sens. 2023;25: 100592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2022.100592.10.1016/j.measen.2022.100592 ↗
82. Wang X, Lu J, Lu S, Li B, Zhang L, Ma C, Ma K, Lin L, Jiang X, Yang B. Health monitoring of repaired composite structure using mxene sensor. Composites Commun. 2021;27: 100850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2021.100850.10.1016/j.coco.2021.100850 ↗
83. Huang J, Li Z, Mao Y, Li Z. Progress and biomedical applications of mxenes. Nano Select. 2021;2(8):1480–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/nano.202000309.10.1002/nano.202000309 ↗
84. Gao D, Guo X, Zhang X, Chen S, Wang Y, Chen T, Huang G, Gao Y, Tian Z, Yang Z. Multifunctional phototheranostic nanomedicine for cancer imaging and treatment. Materials Today Bio. 2020;5: 100035.10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100035 ↗
85. Pan S, Yin J, Yu L, Zhang C, Zhu Y, Gao Y, Chen Y. 2d mxene-integrated 3d-printing scaffolds for augmented osteosarcoma phototherapy and accelerated tissue reconstruction. Adv Sci. 2020;7(2):1901511.10.1002/advs.201901511 ↗
86. Huang Z, Cui X, Li S, Wei J, Li P, Wang Y, Lee C-S. Two-dimensional mxene-based materials for photothermal therapy. Nanophotonics. 2020;9(8):2233–49. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2019-0571.10.1515/nanoph-2019-0571 ↗
87. Zhou L, Zheng H, Liu Z, Wang S, Liu Z, Chen F, Zhang H, Kong J, Zhou F, Zhang Q. Conductive antibacterial hemostatic multifunctional scaffolds based on ti3c2tx mxene nanosheets for promoting multidrug-resistant bacteria-infected wound healing. ACS Nano. 2021;15(2):2468–80. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c06287.10.1021/acsnano.0c06287 ↗
88. Arabi Shamsabadi A, Sharifian GhM, Anasori B, Soroush M. Antimicrobial mode-of-action of colloidal ti3c2t x mxene nanosheets. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2018;6(12):16586–96.10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03823 ↗
89. Jin L, Guo X, Gao D, Wu C, Hu B, Tan G, Du N, Cai X, Yang Z, Zhang X. Nir-responsive mxene nanobelts for wound healing. NPG Asia Mater. 2021;13(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41427-021-00289-w.10.1038/s41427-021-00289-w ↗
90. Xu X, Wang S, Wu H, Liu Y, Xu F, Zhao J. A multimodal antimicrobial platform based on mxene for treatment of wound infection. Colloids Surf B. 2021;207: 111979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111979.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111979 ↗
91. Sun L, Fan L, Bian F, Chen G, Wang Y, Zhao Y. Mxene-integrated microneedle patches with innate molecule encapsulation for wound healing. Research. 2021; https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/983849010.34133/2021/9838490 ↗
92. Hu F, Qi J, Lu Y, He H, Wu W. PLGA-based implants for sustained delivery of peptides/proteins: Current status, challenge and perspectives. Chin Chem Lett. 2023;108250.10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108250 ↗
93. Chereddy KK, Vandermeulen G, Préat V. Plga based drug delivery systems: promising carriers for wound healing activity. Wound Rep Regenerat. 2016;24(2):223–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12404.10.1111/wrr.12404 ↗
94. Yoo J, Won Y-Y. Phenomenology of the initial burst release of drugs from plga microparticles. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(11):6053–62.10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01228 ↗
95. Chen Y, Yu W, Qian X, Li X, Wang Y, Ji J. Dissolving microneedles with a biphasic release of antibacterial agent and growth factor to promote wound healing. Biomater Sci. 2022;10(9):2409–16. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2BM00281G.10.1039/D2BM00281G ↗
96. Lu X, Perera TH, Aria AB, Callahan LAS. Polyethylene glycol in spinal cord injury repair: a critical review. J Exp Pharmacol. 2018;10:37–49. https://doi.org/10.2147/JEP.S148944.10.2147/JEP.S148944 ↗
97. Hutanu D, Frishberg MD, Guo L, Darie CC. Recent applications of polyethylene glycols (pegs) and peg derivatives. Mod Chem Appl. 2014;2(2):1–6.10.4172/2329-6798.1000132 ↗
98. Fenton OS, Tibbitt MW, Appel EA, Jhunjhunwala S, Webber MJ, Langer R. Injectable polymer-nanoparticle hydrogels for local immune cell recruitment. Biomacromol. 2019;20(12):4430–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01129.10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01129 ↗
99. Asfour HZ, Alhakamy NA, Ahmed OAA, Fahmy UA, El-moselhy MA, Rizg WY, Alghaith AF, Eid BG, Abdel-Naim AB. Amitriptyline-based biodegradable peg-plga self-assembled nanoparticles accelerate cutaneous wound healing in diabetic rats. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(9):1792.10.3390/pharmaceutics14091792 ↗
100. C Thomas S, Kumar Mishra P, Talegaonkar S. Ceramic nanoparticles: fabrication methods and applications in drug delivery. Curr Pharmaceutic Des 2015;21(42):6165–6188.10.2174/1381612821666151027153246 ↗